User talk:Alone 333336

December 2021

Hello, I'm CodeTalker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mr. and Mrs. Ramachari, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CodeTalker (talk) 02:48, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Arjun Gowda moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Arjun Gowda, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 11:03, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arjun Gowda (January 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jupitus Smart was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Arjun Gowda instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arjun Gowda and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Arjun Gowda, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jupitus Smart 04:04, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alone 333336! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jupitus Smart 04:04, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kabza

Hello, Alone 333336,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Kabza, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 07:52, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kabza (upcoming film)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kabza (upcoming film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kabzaa (2022 film). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DMySon (talk) 06:50, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alone 333336,

Please stop recreating this page. It will just be deleted. If you want to overcome an AFD deletion decision, you need to work on a draft version and submit it to Articles for Creation for approval. Good luck. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:09, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Rohit Sharma. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — DaxServer (talk · contribs) 14:39, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rohit Sharma has a title named Hitman . Commentators often refer him as Hitman when he scores 100 or 50 . So I wrote it . Alone 333336 (talk) 14:45, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kabza

I have requested speedy deletion of Kabza (upcoming film) again, because a previous discussion found consensus to delete the article. If you feel that it has improved sufficiently to change that consensus, please leave the improved version in draft space and request its promotion using the Articles for creation process. Thanks, Certes (talk) 14:46, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

100 (2021 film)

Please expand the Draft:100 (2021 film). It is a Kannada, Ramesh Aravind film. DareshMohan (talk) 06:22, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Small request, could you please add information about Ramesh Aravind's successful Kannada films on his page (it seems to barely touch the surface). DareshMohan (talk) 06:03, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kabza (upcoming Indian film)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kabza (upcoming Indian film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kabzaa (2022 film). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. BOVINEBOY2008 13:30, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of highest-grossing Kannada films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jogi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of highest-grossing South Indian films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tamil.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Circle Inspector (film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Circle Inspector (film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 05:39, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Circle Inspector (film). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:21, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Circle Inspector (film)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Circle Inspector (film), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:58, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Circle Inspector (film) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Circle Inspector (film). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:59, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Circle Inspector (film) (April 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft lacks a plot summary or synopsis, and lacks a reception section.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Circle Inspector (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Circle Inspector (film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:00, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Naveen Kumar (Kabaddi player)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Naveen Kumar (Kabaddi player). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Naveen Kumar (kabaddi). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Naveen Kumar (kabaddi). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Kpddg ^(talk) 07:23, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Alone 333336

Thank you for creating Nanu Matthu Gunda.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. I marked it as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:34, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Circle Inspector (film)

The article Circle Inspector (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 21:10, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Twenty One Hours moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Twenty One Hours, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ComplexRational (talk) 15:18, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sudeepa

Invitation to participate at discussion at Talk:Sudeep#Requested move 26 July 2022. DareshMohan (talk) 17:54, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Twenty One Hours has been accepted

Twenty One Hours, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dwaipayan (talk) 04:27, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gandhada Gudi (upcoming film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gandhada Gudi (upcoming film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Netherzone (talk) 04:30, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Anthony (film) (November 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheChunky was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Likely notable but there is need of more information in this article. Currently this is stub article. Please add more info and submit again. Thanks.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Richard Anthony (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 02:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indian T20 league

Rajasthan primere league 2023 Create Page Hain9 (talk) 04:30, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maharaja Trophy KSCA T20, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Star Sports.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Alone 333336. Thank you for your work on Karataka Damanaka. Dcotos, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please add Reception section.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dcotos (talk) 06:16, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Kannada films of 2024, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sharan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:59, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Neravanda Aiyappa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prema.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:55, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Dr. Bro

Hello Alone 333336, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Dr. Bro, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Bro.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|SafariScribe}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:11, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't knew that the similar title named Dr Bro is protected and is allowed only for administrators to create when I was creating this article. I think it is better to delete it and let administrators to create whenever they want or make it undergo clean up and moved to the title Dr Bro Alone 333336 (talk) 04:42, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Alone 333336. Thank you for your work on Ranganayaka. Another editor, Vanderwaalforces, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this article. Please update the Reception section with actual receptions and not just links.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:49, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bagheera (2024 film) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Bagheera (2024 film). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Majority of sources fall under NEWSORGINDIA. Could be speedied due to recent deletion but sending to draft as an WP:ATD until there are bylined reviews or singificant coverage that is reliable. . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 21:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It might be difficult to find sources outside NEWSORGINDIA since the article is on an Indian regional film. If we give similar reason for deletion, we need to delete thousands of such articles. Alone 333336 (talk) 01:39, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As a side note on this, many of the references you used fall under WP:NEWSORGINDIA. They would not be reliable for verification or to show notability. --CNMall41 (talk) 01:41, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]