User talk:BZAW31559

Main information

Hi! BZAW31559!

You're the Miserable Magic user! You're:

Born: The miserable date
I lived in: The miserable place
I am: Male
My language level is OK:
- English: This is my native language.
- Spanish: Currently decent. I used the Google Translate soon.
- Japanese: Under learning through internet.
- Thai: This is my miserable language.
My edit quality is OK.
My favorite foreground and background color code: foreground: #124578; background: #ffba76

This user is reserved to indefinite blocking.

This user is reserved to indefinite blocking, and the indefinite blocking is not allowed for subsequent block which can result in 100% active fire index. See Wikipedia:Blocking policy. This is only applicable to non-administrators.

Allowed blocks for subsequent blocks

Causes	Average block expiry	Can edit talk page?	Prevent account creation	Active fire index
Inserting nonsensical/gibberish pages	60 days	Yes	No	Active (10%)
Inserting false information	1 week	Yes	No	Inactive
Removing content from the pages	1 week	Yes	No	Inactive
Intermediate behavior/harassment	1 week	Yes	No	Inactive
Spamming external links	1 month	Yes	No	Active (5%)
Abusing multiple accounts	4 months	Can edit, but maybe filtered to make the edits not live while editing talk page	Yes	Active (20%)
Counter-productive edit warring	100 days	Yes	No	Active (35%)
Sock puppetry of the banned user	1 week	Yes	No	Inactive
High-risk edit warring	100 days	Can edit talk page in some cases, but it maybe banned while editing talk pages	Yes	Active (50%)
High-risk banning	60 days	Can edit talk page in some cases, but it maybe banned while editing talk pages	Yes	Active (25%)
Tagging article for deletion	30 days	Yes	Yes	Active (10%)
Adding excessive red links and overlinks	1 week	Yes	No	Inactive
Disruptive editing	1 week	Yes	No	Inactive
Spam/vandalism	2 weeks	Yes	No	Active (5%)

Legend for active fire index

Active (0%)	Inactive
Active (1~4%)
Active (5~9%)
Active (10~19%)
Active (20~29%)
Active (30~49%)
Active (50~69%)
Active (70~79%)
Active (80~89%)
Active (90~99%)
Active (100%)	Active (Maximum active fire)

BZAW31559, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi BZAW31559! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

For the css

Here you go: User:BZAW31559/bzaw31559.css --BZAW31559 (talk) 03:31, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For tertiary colors

Here you go: User:BZAW31559/Tertiary colors

I will create the missing redirect page soon ~!

I will create the missing redirect page soon ~! —BZAW31559 (talk) 04:46, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Test for the Custom CSS test

Test for the Custom CSS test. I will be test the Cascading Style Sheets right now. –BZAW31559 (talk) 05:44, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

BZAW31559.css

I made new custom colors

I made new custom colors! Yeah! See color. –BZAW31559 (talk) 06:34, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Test for the Japanese language text as unreadable

Test for the Japanese language text as unreadable?

This is caused by mojibake. –BZAW31559 (talk) 06:56, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I need to confirm this user ~!

I need to confirm this user ~! See Wikipedia:Autoconfirmed users. –BZAW31559 (talk) 08:07, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep editing for four days and you are four days old. –BZAW31559 (talk) 08:10, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah! I confirmed this user! --BZAW31559 (talk) 03:23, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:BZAW31559. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 08:10, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of JavaScript syntax/2

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that JavaScript syntax/2, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

The page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. (See section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Daiyusha (talk) 06:17, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your reversion of my speedy deletion decline

Hi BZAW31559,

I noticed you reverted my decline of your speedy deletion request with the comment wait for an admin. For your information, I am an admin, and although I'm currently using my alternate account without the admin flag, that does not make my decline any less of an admin action. I see GoldenRing has also now declined the deletion. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion which detail the strict criteria under which speedy deletion is allowed. Cheers! stwalkerster (sock | talk) 12:36, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

STOP!

Stop tagging articles for deletion. Do not revert people removing your speedy tags. If you continue like this, you will face a block. And, by the way, why are you editing other people's user pages? That is not acceptable. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:20, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For the 16-bit color palettes

Here you go: User:BZAW31559/List of 16-bit computer hardware graphics --BZAW31559 (talk) 03:48, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may not reuse texts from Wikipedia—list of 16-bit computer color palettes in this case—without attribution. Neither within Wikipedia nor anywhere else. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 04:55, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Some urgent advice

BZAW31559, I know you mean well, but there are serious concerns about your editing being discussed at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:BZAW31559. Since Wikipedia is a community in which communication is essential, it is imperative that you respond to those concerns, both at the linked discussion and on this talk page.

I also noticed that you seem intent on becoming an administrator. Please read Wikipedia:Adminship is not for new users, and also note that editing for the sake of becoming an admin is strongly frowned upon by the community and would likely lead to a failed RfA if you continued along those lines. In particular, I very strongly encourage you to delete the "Reserved to indefinite blocking" table and the apparent draft RfA above.

I appreciate that you've taken time to contribute to Wikipedia, and we always love enthusiasm, but you need to slow down because a significant amount of your edits, such as this, have been problematic. This does not mean you are necessarily a bad editor, but it does mean have to listen and communicate with other editors who are trying to help you. To that end, please do refrain from further article editing until you've responded in earnest to the administrators' noticeboard discussion.--Jasper Deng (talk) 07:23, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You edited another user's userspace page again despite being clearly asked to stop. Please please do read everything I said above in full (particularly communication), because otherwise the only option will be to block you. That would be an unfortunate outcome, but will be necessary if you do not communicate.--Jasper Deng (talk) 07:44, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Uncaught SyntaxError: Unexpected number

I got the code:

var 0 = ;

Here you go: Uncaught SyntaxError: Unexpected number --BZAW31559 (talk) 07:49, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Function* listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Function*. Since you had some involvement with the Function* redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Jasper Deng (talk) 07:51, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GoldenRing (talk) 10:18, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have carried on ignoring all advice and warnings, I've blocked you. PLEASE respond to the concerns raised here and at WP:AN/I. GoldenRing (talk) 11:26, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BZAW31559 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Continue reverting article (revert the edits made by anonymous users)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:58, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

GoldenRing, Yamla, what is this user all about? Drmies (talk) 03:22, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No idea. They seem to be trolling for an indefinite block without talk page access. Now the block has expired, we'll quickly see if they mean to be productive. --Yamla (talk) 11:15, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies and Yamla: They clearly do not. This is simple trolling. I've left TP access for now, in case a productive unblock request is forthcoming, but my threshold for removing it is pretty low at this point. GoldenRing (talk) 08:47, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: I guess the guy is identical to a disruptive IPv6 2403:6200:8937::/48 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log)), some of whose dubious additions are still online. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:42, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that there's a behavior match, and am inclined to rangeblock it. Would have done so already if I had been better at reading IPv6 CIDR notation, and now am late to a meeting. If nobody objects in the next few hr or does it themselves, I'll do it later today. DMacks (talk) 14:07, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Abuse Filter

See User:Abuse Filter

Be aware of subsequent block

Be aware of subsequent block to BZAW31559! --BZAW31559 (talk) 03:04, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If any administrators block this user, even if they are awared, do not rely the indefinite block at all. Maybe try blocking this user for up to one year? --BZAW31559 (talk) 03:04, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hard account block; be aware! --BZAW31559 (talk) 03:04, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Signature test

BZAW31559 (talk) 03:33, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:30, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GoldenRing (talk) 08:45, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BZAW31559 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

No reason provided. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:59, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BZAW31559, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

DanielRigal (talk) 14:17, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:BZAW31559/sandbox/unofficialjavascript

A tag has been placed on User:BZAW31559/sandbox/unofficialjavascript requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DanielRigal (talk) 14:35, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:BZAW31559/sandbox/Custom Color Palette Wiki

A tag has been placed on User:BZAW31559/sandbox/Custom Color Palette Wiki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DanielRigal (talk) 14:36, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:BZAW31559/sandbox/custom2048

A tag has been placed on User:BZAW31559/sandbox/custom2048 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DanielRigal (talk) 14:37, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:BZAW31559/sandbox/jssyntaxerror

A tag has been placed on User:BZAW31559/sandbox/jssyntaxerror requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DanielRigal (talk) 14:38, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:BZAW31559/Tertiary colors

A tag has been placed on User:BZAW31559/Tertiary colors requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DanielRigal (talk) 14:41, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:BZAW31559/sandbox/custom2048

User:BZAW31559/sandbox/custom2048, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:BZAW31559/sandbox/custom2048 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:BZAW31559/sandbox/custom2048 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DanielRigal (talk) 14:41, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

User has engaged in block evasion as Incas00 ANI in August, 2019. --Yamla (talk) 11:37, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Yamla: so WP:THREESTRIKES applies from now on? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:26, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Incas00 ANI is definitely a strike. Probably the first one; ColorizedNEZ is not a checkuser-block, so doesn't count toward WP:3X. However, this user is at least on the path toward an indefinite community ban. --Yamla (talk) 12:54, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]