User talk:Babyscorpio97

Welcome!

Hello, Babyscorpio97, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! KylieTastic (talk) 15:44, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is Babyscorpio97's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stephane Mgebrishvili (June 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NMUSICIAN - requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stephane Mgebrishvili and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Stephane Mgebrishvili, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 09:14, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Babyscorpio97! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 09:14, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stephane Mgebrishvili (June 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stephane Mgebrishvili and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Stephane Mgebrishvili, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 15:44, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nino Chkheidze

The article Nino Chkheidze has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NMUSICIAN - no evidence of notability in any online sources that I could find. Current sources used are based on singer's own social media accounts.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nick Moyes (talk) 23:02, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eka Kvaliashvili

Hello, Babyscorpio97

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Meatsgains and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Eka Kvaliashvili, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Meatsgains^(talk) 23:45, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eka Kvaliashvili moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Eka Kvaliashvili, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 02:41, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Eka Kvaliashvili

Hello, Babyscorpio97. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eka Kvaliashvili".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:17, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Hello, I'm RPI2026F1. I noticed that in this edit to Mingrelian language, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. RPI2026F1 (talk) 22:30, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for answering. It was FALSE information and russian bots do that all the time. Please translate georgian wikipedia posts. Because it 100% true. Russia rewrites georgias history all the time. It should be illigal. "Megrelian affair" is russias fabricated story and crime agains georgian people. You dont made up stories like yhat. Thanks Babyscorpio97 (talk) 21:09, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Megrelian is right spoken gorm in megrelian language and in georgian. miNgrelia is wrong. Just wanted to correct Babyscorpio97 (talk) 22:33, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes,Correct is Megrelia. "Megreli" in georgian. Russia is changing it. Its going for centuries. Babyscorpio97 (talk) 01:02, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your changes on the Batumi page

I do not doubt the usefulness of your edits, but please use edit summaries while editing. Uness232 (talk) 10:42, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. It is legal to rewrite history? I know russian bots for that. But georgias history shoud be protected!!! Babyscorpio97 (talk) 21:03, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well national revisionist history (Russian or otherwise) is not allowed on Wikipedia of course. My concern was simply about the edit summary. Uness232 (talk) 22:16, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Khachapuri, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 00:06, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Its not "russian wikipedia"page. Please dont put RUSSIAN PROPAGANDA on Georgias culture and history. Protect Georgias history. Babyscorpio97 (talk) 00:25, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Khachapuri, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 00:22, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Its not "russian wikipedia"page. Please dont put RUSSIAN PROPAGANDA on Georgias culture and history. Protect Georgias history. Babyscorpio97 (talk) 00:28, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Khachapuri, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Sira Aspera (talk) 13:44, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

stop putting russias name in georgian wikipedia pages. You can post fake stroy in russian wikipedia but not in English! Babyscorpio97 (talk) 16:23, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The burden of proof is on you. Bring your issues to the talk page, present sources and seek consensus. DO NOT arbitrarily remove material because you disagree with it. It's called vandalism. Sira Aspera (talk) 16:25, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop Russian Propaganda and false information! Stalin has nothing to do with batumi! Babyscorpio97 (talk) 16:32, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DE

Greetings! You are engaged in WP:DE and would like to ask you to stop disrupting the articles. Regards, An emperor ✖ 16:27, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Emperor is russian bot. Hes rewriting georgian history. Please protect georgias history! Thank you Babyscorpio97 (talk) 21:13, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, you are engaged in WP:DE and would like to ask you to stop disrupting the articles. გთხოვთ შეწყვიტოთ თემების ვანდალიზმი რადგან დარეპორტდებით და შეგეზღუდებათ ვიკიპედიაში ჯანსაღი მონაწილეობის მიღება. "რუსი ბოტის" დაძახება კი მიპატიებია. An emperor ✖ 02:31, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Colchis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laz. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 13:35, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Uness232 (talk) 00:36, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 00:41, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]