User talk:Basketballfan1025

As Heythereboy

Heythereboy, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Heythereboy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! 78.26 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:16, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited DWMT-AM, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Naga, Lucena and Talk. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

About your RfA

Hello Heythereboy, I just closed your RfA per WP:NOTNOW. Please be aware that it usually takes a few thousand edits and quite a few months of experience to have a chance at passing RfA. I recommend that you read our page on administrators so that you can understand what being an admin is all about. --Biblioworm 16:26, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if you are going to contribute to Wikipedia, it would help if you would learn to read instructions before you do anything. If you need any help with anything or understanding English, don't hesitate to let me know. Happy editing!--Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 18:00, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps also if you are going to vote on other users' RfA you could read the instructions too. As it stands, although I'm sure you mean well, without a proper signature as required by user comments on debate and talk pges, it won't be counted. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 18:41, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain this?

Every edit you have made so far in User space has had to be fixed.

You created this User Page with a banned message User:Janinetugonon and on the talk page you inserted this indefinite block message [1].

You are not an Admin. and the user is not blocked.

Do you actually know what you are doing or are you just making it up? You cannot impersonate the actions of Administrators on En-wiki. Can I suggest you reserve your editing to articles rather than dishing out quasi-Admin. warnings with little basis in fact and no knowledge as to what you are doing. Leaky Caldron 19:33, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Rufemyx123 ‎. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Mkdw ^talk 20:48, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Filomenatabanao, you may be blocked from editing. Mkdw ^talk 20:50, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In both these cases you posted inappropriate warnings and in the incorrect place. You have also impersonated an administrator by informing another editor that you have indefinitely blocked them and that they were a "confirmed" sock puppet. As also mentioned above, you created an RFA that was a clear case of WP:NOTNOW and should have come to that conclusion by reading the instructions. At present your edits are representing a fairly large disruption to several areas and may be blocked to prevent further damage to the project. I strongly suggest you do some significant reading into various areas including WP:WARNVAND, WP:SPI, and WP:ETIQ. Mkdw ^talk 20:55, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:07, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Heythereboy, your block will be coming to a close and I wanted to reach out to you to offer you some advice. I sincerely hope you took the time to read over the provided material above. Editing on Wikipedia can be a confusing process with many rules to follow. To help newcomers, we have the WP:TEAHOUSE where you can ask questions, as well as an adoption program at WP:ADOPT that will put you in contact with someone whom you can freely ask questions and will take an interest in how you settle yourself here. My real piece of advice would be to take your time and do not hesitate to ask first if you're in doubt about something. Regards, Mkdw ^talk 02:27, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give DXKP a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 16:42, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Hi MixItUp1009. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However I noticed that you recently recreated Mabuhay Broadcasting System, an article previously deleted, and did not cite any sources. Please remember that ALL articles on Wikipedia must cite reliable and verifiable sources. Unsourced articles undermine the credibility of the project. Thank you again for your contributions. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:24, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Closing discussion discussions

Please do not close deletion discussions until you can demonstrate to the community your experience and good judgement. See Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions#non-admin_AfD_closure. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:55, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. Please consider submitting to Wikipedia:Requested articles instead. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:MixItUp1009/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Sam ^Sing! 11:20, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: MixItUp1009 (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. Please consider submitting to Wikipedia:Requested articles instead. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MixItUp1009 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Sam ^Sing! 13:38, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: MixItUp1009 (February 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Josve05a was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. Please consider submitting to Wikipedia:Requested articles instead. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MixItUp1009 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

(t) Josve05a (c) 14:10, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

K-Love

Per MOS:TM, we do not capitalize letters in trademarks unless they actually are an acronym. Unless K-LOVE actually stands for something as an acronym, we stylize it as K-Love instead. ViperSnake151 Talk 16:02, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Muliple redirects listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect DWAJ-TV. Since you had some involvement with the DWAJ-TV redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Rubbish computer 16:09, 15 August 2015 (UTC) I don't want to clog your talk page up with messages about redirects that are being discussed on the same day. The following redirects are also being discussed:[reply]

Rubbish computer 16:28, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:MixItUp1009

Hello, Basketballfan1025. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "MixItUp1009".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 13:27, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]