Jump to content

User talk:BlueNoise/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi BlueNoise! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Advice for a beginner editor, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, BlueNoise, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

BlueNoise, good luck, and have fun. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 17:52, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
Thank you, and sorry for the late reply ElHef! BlueNoise (talk) 17:36, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Haven't seen you reverting vandalism until now. Nice seeing new users helping out. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:49, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Thanks! Glad to be of help! :) BlueNoise (talk) 17:51, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

September 2022

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Darth Vader, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 21:27, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Blaze Wolf Huh? I was reverting the string of vandalism left by the editor that goes by the username "JesusWins777". They've been leaving a trail of disruptive and nonsensical edits sine yesterday. BlueNoise (talk) 21:29, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

would you like to qualify that ?

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Deep_sea&oldid=1113181458

it would be useful to review exactly why you reverted the image. JarrahTree 06:23, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

JarrahTree The edit history for the page in question is speckled with both constructive edits, as well as unconstructive edits. The image that was being used was fine, and is also a lot larger than the image that replaced it. All in all the edit seemed like it was a unconstructive edit. BlueNoise (talk) 06:26, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
I can see where you are coming from, I am going to revert your edit, you are most welcome to request an extended reply to qualify why I am doing so - but its up to you, the AGF edit on your part, and the AGF edit on the part of the uploader and your understanding are fine - so you want context, fine, if you want to leave it, fine. JarrahTree 06:30, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
JarrahTree Is there any way to expand the image on the page it's self so I don't need a magnifying glass to see it? BlueNoise (talk) 06:32, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
the issue is being attended to JarrahTree 06:58, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
JarrahTree I seen, and it's looking good! Thank you! BlueNoise (talk) 06:59, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

2022 Atlantic hurricane season

the listing of names in alphabetical order is currently being discussed on the talk page 68.195.238.98 (talk) 07:00, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

68.195.238.98 That's not a reason for you to change the name of an already recorded Atlantic tropical storm. Your edit summary also lended weight to the notion that your edits were unconstructive. BlueNoise (talk) 07:03, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Consilience

I can see you are a rather new editor. Why have you changed the minor grammatical improvements I made to this entry? 86.137.177.138 (talk) 11:04, 1 October 2022 (UTC) Above by me. I have undone your rather pointless reversion of my grammatical improvement. Talk page, don't RV me. Ironman1104 14:00, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

86.137.177.138 Ironman1104 I reverted the edit because I was concerned that the tone was not encyclopedic in nature. Since it is not of a concern to either of you, I'll stand down regarding this. BlueNoise (talk) 21:54, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Vandalism

The User:144.62.225.210 Has already been given a level 4 warning. They have been reported to WP Adminship. Thank you for your assistance though. Toast (talk) 13:30, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Your welcome. BlueNoise (talk) 13:32, 3 October 2022 (UTC)


Democratic Republic of Georgia

Can you be more specific? Were all my changes reverted or just a specific one? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:2FC0:F:81D9:9D27:E036:57C9 (talk) 18:45, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello. I reverted all of your edits after reviewing each one due to your edits not reflecting an encyclopedic tone. Here is a guide on maintaining an encyclopedic tone, as well as a guide on words to avoid. If you have any other questions feel free to ask me here, or on the help desk where there is always awesome editors standing by waiting to help. BlueNoise (talk) 19:12, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Help me!

Hello, there. I am unsure if travel sites, such as this[1] would be a good source for related sections and subsections of articles. I'm hoping someone can clarify this for me, and point me in the right direction for a reliable source for local attractions and destinations. Thank you. BlueNoise (talk) 06:37, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Trip Advisor is not a good source for most things, since they are just a data aggregate site; any substantial or significant information would likely be found in other locations on better sources. If you want more help, change the {{help me-helped}} back into a {{help me}}, stop by the Teahouse, or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 06:56, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
I'm also looking for suggestions on what sources would be to good to use for this topic. Thank you. BlueNoise (talk) 06:59, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
I think you'll be better off asking elsewhere, given the lack of response. Sorry. My only advice would be to use reputable news outlets such as newspapers or magazines, or websites with a history of editorial oversight and fact checking (in other words, the kind of thing you'd find at WP:RS). Primefac (talk) 09:39, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Lord & Taylor

Hello, thanks for sharing your concern. I am new to Wikipedia and have a passion for department stores and retail in general. I appreciate your feedback. Dccore45 (talk) 00:47, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Your welcome. Editing other articles that fall under the same topics would also be advisable to avoid any further confusion in the future. If you have any other questions, please feel free to ask at the Help Desk, which is staffed by other wonderful contributors. BlueNoise (talk) 00:51, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

@Dccore45: You should also check out the essay on single-purpose accounts. It's an essay to read, rather than a guideline to follow. However, it helps to figure out how to best contribute to the best of your ability to Wikipedia. Hope you have a good rest of your day or night! BlueNoise (talk) 01:21, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks! You as well. Dccore45 (talk) 01:25, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Name conventions

Hello! While browsing recent changes, I came across this edit[2], and am curious if what this contributor is doing is within the bounds of the manual of style guidelines for non-English characters in articles. Thank you. BlueNoise (talk) 16:38, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Yes, it is within policy. Names and other words that are normally spelled with diacritical marks can be spelled that way in Wikipedia articles. One way to decide if "normally" applies is to check if there is an article title spelled that way, as there is for Duy Tân. In almost all cases, Wikipedia will have a redirect spelled without diacritic markings that points to the actual article with diacritics. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 18:33, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi BlueNoise. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or RedWarn.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! ~Swarm~ {sting} 16:49, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for reminding me why I abandoned my Wikipedia account

I'll admit I gave a humorous edit summary to Template:Diplomacy, but the change of article name/link Queen's Messenger to King's Messenger I reflecting in my edit was not mine. I was eliminating a redirect and having the link in the template reflect the current title of the article. But I neglected to remember that these days Wikipedia is entirely serious without any sense of humor or fun. That's what caused me to abandon being a formal Wikipedian. I refuse to become a dull boy. 2600:1700:3801:8990:401D:1D00:7935:2315 (talk) 03:49, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

2600:1700:3801:8990:401D:1D00:7935:2315 I'm sorry, that was my fault for not double checking your edit before reverting. I'll definitely take what you said into consideration. BlueNoise (talk) 05:02, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

I am very grateful to you.

Thank you for your support in my fight against that very experienced vandal. I really appreciate your reverts: [3], [4], [5], [6]. Of course, the vandal got active again, now as 86.187.165.112. I reported the new IP to WP:BKFIP (see the talk). Cheers :-) 85.193.215.210 (talk) 14:53, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Your welcome! BlueNoise (talk) 16:21, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MegaMack02

Just noticed McLaren 600LT tried to Bribe @Khonda8 into moving the draft to mainspace. (Please see [7] for evidence). They also reverted your edit.72.253.6.229 (talk) 03:45, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Can you consider adding the fact to the SPI? 72.253.6.229 (talk) 03:52, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
It's not really a necessary detail, to be honest. In sockpuppet investigations, the contributor reviewing the case is looking for behaviors that link one account to another account that was already blocked, or is being used outside the rules for having multiple accounts. BlueNoise (talk) 03:55, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Also noticed @Bugs Meanie doing a bit of trolling as well and using fake signatures on Elcobolla’s talk page where the MegaMack sock changed the name of @Dreamy Jazz from “Jazz” to “JADS” and listing Dreamy Jazz an enemy of Elcobbola.([8])Also added massive move request that is on the rampage ([9]).
If this batch of editing hopefully cheers people up, it has not. Not sure what was on Tropicalkitty’s mind when reverting Bugs’ edits. 72.253.6.229 (talk) 04:02, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Yep, that’s them. Characteristic edits on es.wiki too. Please add Bugs Meanie to the SPI. Thanks. 72.253.6.229 (talk) 04:07, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Done. BlueNoise (talk) 06:06, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
I reverted after I came across this discussion. The content from that user appeared to be disruptive. Tropicalkitty (talk) 04:24, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rossville, Illinois, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David White. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Section for comment by User:2405:204:5096:AB12:A36C:2DC8:5F78:7765

There are no historical evidences that onion masala dosa or rava masala dosa exist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:5096:AB12:A36C:2DC8:5F78:7765 (talk) 20:17, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

You have to cite a reliable source if you wish for this to reflect in the articles you edited. BlueNoise (Désorienté? It's just purple) 20:21, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Loxosceles palma has been accepted

Loxosceles palma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 20:12, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

House of Piccolomini

Hi, I've seen that you removed my edits, in good faith. These edits were simply text already sourced in the Wikipedia pages of the people I added text to. I added this text to give a better understanding of who these people were, as not much was written in the resume next to their names. You can easily verify what I am saying. I will revert it for now, but if you still disagree, maybe we can talk it over, no problem. Have a good day ;) 2607:FA49:1A44:4700:C45C:8E39:66EA:1E40 (talk) 21:13, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

That's fair. As long as there is a reliable source to support the content being added. BlueNoise (Désorienté? It's just purple) 02:03, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Loxosceles accepta has been accepted

Loxosceles accepta, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 13:24, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

User talk:2601:1C0:CE00:A290:0:0:0:90A1

No point getting into a revert war with someone like that. It's like wrestling a pig in the mud, but I'm sure you know that joke. Just leave me be and report them. Drmies (talk) 01:59, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Drmies I don't mean to be rude, but if it wasn't myself reverting that IP editor it would have been someone else. They were well past their final warning, and their edits were pure disruption which I figured meant my reverting their edits was exempted by 3RRNO. Unless I am mistaken? BlueNoise (Désorienté? It's just purple) 02:10, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
When you wrestle with a pig, you both get muddy but the pig enjoys it. Drmies (talk) 13:53, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Drmies Point taken. BlueNoise (Désorienté? It's just purple) 16:04, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Loxosceles speluncarum has been accepted

Loxosceles speluncarum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 19:19, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Loxosceles sonora has been accepted

Loxosceles sonora, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 22:23, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Magizoologist

Hi BlueNoise! Is Magizoologist to Magical creatures in Harry Potter#Magizoology a double redirect? Had edited it because Magizoology redirects there. Thank you! 201.43.169.36 (talk) 06:02, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

It turns out I thought you restored the redirect from 2 diffs before, and was mistaken. Sorry about that, I have restored your edit. BlueNoise (Désorienté? It's just purple) 18:39, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
No problem! Thank you BlueNoise! 2804:431:F73D:DD82:D159:36E8:1699:6836 (talk) 23:17, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Rollback tool

Hi Bluenosie, we have once worked together in mass-rollbacking some edits by an IP or some disruptive editor. I just found this script that would have been helpful at the time. Maybe you see it as helpful as well? Paradise Chronicle (talk) 01:37, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Stefano Delle Chiaie

Hello, I’m wondering why you reverted my edit in the Stefano Delle Chiaie page. Your edit summary mentioned “block evasion (CarlostheJackal01)”, which I’m not sure applies to me.

Thanks for your time, Neighborhood Review (talk) 02:09, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Neighborhood Review Hello, there. You are right that your edit was erroneously reverted. I apologize, I was rushing to get through cleaning up the mess left behind by CarlostheJackal. I have restored your edit(s). Thank you for your understanding. BlueNoise (Désorienté? It's just purple) 17:56, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
No worries, thanks for taking the time to look into it. I just noticed that you’re relatively new to Wikipedia so I’d like to extend a belated welcome as well! Neighborhood Review (talk) 03:24, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:BlueNoise/Archive_1&oldid=1187312206"