User talk:Bradbm893

Welcome!

Hello, Bradbm893! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 00:14, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

January 2019

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Rescuers Down Under, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 19:19, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Bradbm893, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page The Chicago Premium Outlets did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Cubbie15fan (talk) 20:20, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Orland Park Place

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Orland Park Place requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.deadmalls.com/malls/orland_park_place.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cubbie15fan (talk) 20:24, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Springbrook Prairie Pavilion moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Springbrook Prairie Pavilion, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 23:22, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Chicago Premium Outlets moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Chicago Premium Outlets, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 23:22, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Grove Shopping Center moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Grove Shopping Center, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 23:23, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Grove Shopping Center moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Grove Shopping Center, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 00:08, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Chicago Premium Outlets moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Chicago Premium Outlets, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 00:09, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Springbrook Prairie Pavilion moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Springbrook Prairie Pavilion, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 00:09, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Independent, reliable sources needed

Hi Bradbm893, pls note that all article in Wikipedia main page need to pass the notability requirements and supported by sources.see below

WP:Your First Article to know how to read an article in Wikipedia
referencing for beginners to understand how to provide inline citations
pls provide at least 3 (i) independent, (ii) reliable sources such as from major newspapers / academic journals (iii) which the sources talk about the subject in length and in dept and not only passing mentioned.
the content need to writ in a neutral point of view; not WP:PROMOTION and WP:PUFF
no violation of copyright infringement- write summaries the sources content in "your own words".
go to notability page and look at the right panel and click on the relevant topics and follow the links.
pls click on all the blue highlighted texts on this message and it will lead you to other pages for for info and/or instructions.
pls only resumbit (click the submit for review) only when independent, reliable sources are provide as for the present stage the articles will not be approved. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 00:13, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Westridge Court moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Westridge Court, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 01:29, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chicago Premium Outlets moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chicago Premium Outlets, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:54, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Westridge Court moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Westridge Court, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:55, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Springbrook Prairie Pavilion moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Springbrook Prairie Pavilion, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:55, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pls stop recreating the article without sources provided

Hi Bradbm893, Your article at the present stage will not be approved so stop recreating them unless sources are provided. Information of what are needed and how to do have been outlined to you on my previous message. Please read them and lick on the blue highlighted texts to for further info. Pls see [[1]]. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:59, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orland Park Place moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Orland Park Place, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:18, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Grove (Downers Grove, Illinois) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Grove (Downers Grove, Illinois), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:18, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Orland Park Place

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Orland Park Place requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://deadmalls.com/malls/orland_park_place.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:20, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. This is a final warning - you have recreated the same copyvio several times, moved warred to get it into mainspace and removed the speedy deletion and revdel tags. In addition, the source in which you've chosen to base this on is entirely unreliable. Praxidicae (talk) 14:18, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Orland Park Place

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Orland Park Place requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://deadmalls.com/malls/orland_park_place.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 01:48, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Grove (Downers Grove, Illinois), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Willowbrook, Illinois (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bradley Commons

The article Bradley Commons has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:ROUTINE coverage in hyper-local sources only, not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 18:39, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your articles

Hi Bradbm893, this is a final attempt to reach out to you concerning your article creation. Can you please explain why you've created more than a dozen stubs on shopping centers based on completely unreliable sources, if you've added any at all? I noticed you've not communicated once with any of the editors who have brought up concerns in the past. Praxidicae (talk) 19:00, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And even since this request, warning and attempts to reach out, you've continued disruptively editing by removing legitimate maintenance tags. Consider this your actual final, final warning before this is forced to go to ANI. Giving @Bradbm893: a courtesy ping in case they are unaware of how to get to their talk page. Praxidicae (talk) 19:23, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bradley Commons for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bradley Commons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bradley Commons until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 22:33, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion. Given how many warnings you've been given, it seems a bad idea for you to be disruptively removing AFD tags. Praxidicae (talk) 23:07, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Bradv🍁 23:16, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Grove (Downers Grove, Illinois)

The article The Grove (Downers Grove, Illinois) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails notability guidelines

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jmertel23 (talk) 23:42, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Grove (Downers Grove, Illinois) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Grove (Downers Grove, Illinois) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Grove (Downers Grove, Illinois) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jmertel23 (talk) 00:14, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Glen Town Center for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Glen Town Center is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glen Town Center until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 00:28, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Glen Town Center for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Glen Town Center is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glen Town Center until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 00:28, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Let's talk

@Bradbm893: At least three times now, you have removed Articles for deletion notices from articles, and you have previously been warned for this. Can you please clarify whether you are reading the messages people are posting here? They contain a lot of very important information for you to know if you would like to keep editing this encyclopedia. I'm happy to help you if you need clarification or information about anything, but we really need some communication from your end for that to happen. Please reply. Bradv🍁 00:51, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Woodfield Mall, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 01:14, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Woodfield Mall shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bradv🍁 02:07, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Bradbm893 reported by User:Bradv (Result: ). Thank you. Bradv🍁 02:35, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 02:36, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copying content from malls.wikia.com

Note that https://malls.wikia.com licences its content as CC-BY-SA - the "BY" means that you need to credit malls.wikia.com as the source when copy-and-pasting one of its articles across to Wikipedia, as you've done at North Park Plaza. You just need to use the {{wikia content}} template, which I've now done on that article. --Lord Belbury (talk) 10:28, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

to add to this, you shouldn’t be copying anything wholesale, much less from such an unreliable source. Praxidicae (talk) 12:49, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Largest malls of the United States

A tag has been placed on Template:Largest malls of the United States requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tinton5 (talk) 13:28, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple accounts

Could you please explain your connection to Sfgamfan76? Your technically Confirmed to each other and behaviourally this appears to be some sort of failed clean start account.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:42, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ponyo You might want to take a look at this too. Praxidicae (talk) 21:05, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bradbm893: In addition, can you please explain why you thought it was appropriate to re-add the same trivial nonsense you tried to edit war into the article and were blocked for, immediately following the release of your block? Pinging @Drmies: as he was the blocking administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 21:04, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ponyo, what a strange set of affairs. Drmies (talk) 01:57, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This all seems oddly familiar to me, but I can't remember the accounts that were editing this way previously. Regardless, as this account is now blocked indef I have blocked Sfgamfan76 as well.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:09, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chicago Premium Outlets

Hello, Bradbm893,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Citrivescence and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Chicago Premium Outlets, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Citrivescence}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Citrivescence (talk) 06:06, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mellody Farm

Hello Bradbm893,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mellody Farm for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Citrivescence (talk) 02:49, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Shoppes at Grand Prairie

Hello, Bradbm893,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Citrivescence and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, The Shoppes at Grand Prairie, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Citrivescence}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Citrivescence (talk) 23:16, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Shops at Oak Brook Place

The article The Shops at Oak Brook Place has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of importance, does not meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:17, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Springbrook Prairie Pavilion

Hello, Bradbm893,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Springbrook Prairie Pavilion should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Springbrook Prairie Pavilion .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:07, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mellody Farm for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mellody Farm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mellody Farm until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MB 01:47, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]