User talk:Capricorn42/Archive11

User:Simontodorov

I believe he posted the "helpme" template because of the proposed deletion of Todor Todorov. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:03, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Yes, what's the appropriate thing to do if user doesn't ask a question? I think I'll just give them a link to wp:prod in case they want to contest it. --Unpopular Opinion (talk) 19:10, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Replied

I have replied on Wikipedia:Help desk#Problem with using a Non-free use media on another page --Zaher1988 · ^Talk|_{Contributions} 19:35, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

You do more than me, actually. Thanks for the star. Dekisugi (talk) 08:19, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Naah you've been around since 2007! This shows your commitment to the project. --Unpopular Opinion (talk) 08:21, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

THANKS

Hello Friend,thanx for helping me for creating itm,gwalior page.But i am again facing a problem regarding "criteria for speedy deletion",i dont know how to get rid out of this trouble. Please help me. Bashish.

User page

Thanks for the revert. --Chasingsol^(talk) 09:13, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

No worries. --Unpopular Opinion (talk) 19:17, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Sorry

Yeah sorry. Still learning. I am reading up on how to create a userbox and got confused. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobbyschultz (talk • contribs)

No harm done, you can do almost all tests that you want to do in your userspace :) --Unpopular Opinion (talk) 09:04, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

cite web

I was just going to answer your question with User:Mr.Z-man/refToolbar (also available as a gadget in "my preferences"), when you went and blanked your question! DuncanHill (talk) 18:29, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. yeah I just noticed the button on top of the editing window! –Unpopular Opinion (talk) 18:30, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

If you are a Firefox user there is a very useful extension that adds a right click menu item to create cite web code. You will find it here. – ukexpat (talk) 20:33, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks–Unpopular Opinion (talk) 09:01, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Lee Slater

No problem - you db-person-ed it just as I userfied it. It has happened to me before. Actually, I am beginning to think that userfying little bits of autobiography by new users rather than db-ing them, though friendly, is a waste of time. I checked back on 25 who I had userfied like that and left messages welcoming and explaining, and one of them thanked me and made a few more edits, the other 24 never edited again. I guess what they were looking for was a social-networking site, and once they realised WP wasn't that they lost interest. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 19:54, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

Wonder what I did to tick that guy off...? Besides, isn't "Tony Stark" the real name of "Iron Man?" If he built a robot, he did it in his head or in his dreams after reading one too many Marvel comics.  :) As for my hobbies, I have quite a few outside of this site, believe me. Thanks for the rollback. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 08:47, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

hahahaaa, I read the message he left just now!–Unpopular Opinion (talk) 08:51, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

On my way. I like having the admin tools back. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 08:55, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

that's horse-shit, man

i dare you to prove that my edit to the A-team page is factually invalid. you've got nothing!

WP:NPOV, WP:CRYSTAL  :)–Unpopular Opinion (talk) 10:58, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Rename

Check my log - they should have moved, but the server often takes some time to reattribute them, especially when we rename larger accounts, like your's. Give it 24 hours and if they're not where they should be, drop me a line again. --Dweller (talk) 11:31, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Here. You have 55K edits - that'll take quite some time to move. I'm more concerned I caught all your userspace than the edits being reattributed. --Dweller (talk) 11:33, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Ah, thanks. I don't see any problem with the userspace. –Unpopular Opinion (talk) 11:37, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Admin

Have you ever run for admin? --Dweller (talk) 14:22, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Nope, created account in October 2008 so It would have been too early right? :)–Capricorn42 (talk) 14:28, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Not in my book, but perhaps in others. I recommend you do some reading (WP:ADMIN is a good place to start, as is my unfinished essay) and let me know when you're ready. I'll certainly consider nominating you. --Dweller (talk) 14:32, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Will do, thanks for the links!–Capricorn42 (talk) 14:33, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

+WP:PREP --Dweller (talk) 14:49, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Ops! I did it again

Sorry, sometime I forgot this is another wiki... =P Locos epraix (talk) 15:52, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

WHY DID YOU DELETE YAY PAGE

ITS A GREAT IDEA—Preceding unsigned comment added by Ningnangnong (talk • contribs)

LOL!

Thanks.  :) It was just too hard to resist. Yay! --PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:36, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

I am curious about the opt-out on autosign.

sinebot's sigs are ugly, but I always dig into the edit log and see who I am talking to if the post isn't signed, which makes me use bad language, and then the cat laughs at me. I am interested to know why not having sinebot (besides the ugly-sig thing?) is desirable? NP if you don't say, of course, I just spotted the opt-out and was overtaken by curiosity. :) All the best, and thanks for zapping the vandalwarning on Chasingsol, it certainly wasn't deserved.sinneed (talk) 18:46, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

I just don't like being spied upon by a bot :) If you click the edit tab on the top of this page you will see I have totally banned SineBot from this page by adding the {{Bots}} template - I have had multiple edit conflicts with this bot in the past while replying to anonymous IPs who didn't sign their posts;just hated it. Best, –Capricorn42 (talk) 18:57, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Ah, I have had that happen to me when I am trying to to throw sand on raging talk page infernos. :) Thanks for satisfying my curiosity. Cheers! :) sinneed (talk) 19:00, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Cookie!

Maddie! has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Maddie (formerly Ashbey) 02:24, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Wow, I'm surprised you never received one before O_o.--Maddie (formerly Ashbey) 02:45, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Gostkowski article

One question--the editor making the change is anonymous, and frequently changes IP addresses. Where do I put the 3RRN? Samer (talk) 05:01, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

I think the most recently used IP should be reported. The edit warring noticeboard is here –Capricorn42 (talk) 05:03, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

User page revert

Just wanted to say thank you for picking up the vandalism of my user page so fast and reverting it. Much appreciated! One of these days I'll actually get round to typing something useful on it... :)

P.S. The link on your talk page to leave you a new message looks like it points to an old username (not the current Capricorn42) and although it does redirect, my original message doesn't seem to have saved.

Best regards, ZX81 ^talk 05:10, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks I fixed the link, forgot to do so earlier. –Capricorn42 (talk) 05:14, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Huggling

On Leon Panetta, a relatively high profile BLP article, you first reverted and then restored vandalism. I'm not sure why, but you might want to be a bit more careful. Avruch ^T 17:57, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. I don't remember why I undid it :S –Capricorn42 (talk) 18:04, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

I liked your old name :)

Well, I did! Fiddle Faddle (talk) 18:04, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Me too. :( --KnowledgeHegemony ^talk 18:11, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. I just wanted to have a generic username :) –Capricorn42 (talk) 18:17, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Well, I think it takes something away. But that's ok too  :} Fiddle Faddle (talk) 18:51, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Editing a page but not showing it

Thanks for the tip. So by saving it in the discussion tab it won't impact what people see on the page itself? I assume once I'm happy I then cut and paste from discussion to page?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.53.183.73 (talk • contribs)

It will be visible to others if they visit your talk page, but nobody really cares what you do on your own talk page. There's a drawback which Jbarta pointed out at the help desk though. –Capricorn42 (talk) 20:41, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Headline text

thanks dude, I was trying to edit ballfour to edit out what seemed to be just opinion and when I left the page didn't realize how much had been deleted.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.143.184.151 (talk • contribs)

ok..–Capricorn42 (talk) 20:49, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

WP:PROD or WP:AFD it if you still want the article deleted. –Capricorn42 (talk) 20:50, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Hot Karl

Really does live in a Demon Cove and write black metal now. Look it up.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.1.65.229 (talk • contribs)

Oshi

Quit stalking me D: 68.97.23.125 (talk) 09:42, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Changes On Brook

Hey dude ,,, i noticed u reverted my changes ,,, well what i wrote was actually correct. but if you fell it aint ... hmph .... its ok!

Replied on your talk page. –Capricorn42 (talk) 09:47, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Actually .... what i added about brook is correct, it was there before, but was removed.. i dont know why. Also i cant provide a CITE, but i am 100% sure about that, in episode 338 When Luffy, Sanji & Nami check out the "Ghost Ship" they meet Brook for the first time, there he asks Nami to allow him to see her panties, to which he gets a kick to his head. Secondly in episode 339 when Brook comes on Thousand Sunny, he talks to everyone, and when he sees Nico Robin He asks the same question and gets a boot from Nami.

Replied again, on your talk page. –Capricorn42 (talk) 10:31, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Hey Capricon42, thanks for implimenting my changes. My name changed to Sparko85 bcuz i just registered, i am the same person who wrote the above messages to u.

D—Preceding unsigned comment added by Sparko85 (talk • contribs)

That's cool! –Capricorn42 (talk) 10:40, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case concerning Korlzor

You have been helping fight vandalism inflicted by various IP sockpuppets of the blocked User:Korlzor. You may be interested in a sockpuppetry case I have opened here. Best regards. Tennis expert (talk) 10:24, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

I may have reverted vandalism, but I'm not aware of what the whole sock issue is. Thanks for letting me know though. –Capricorn42 (talk) 10:34, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Suresh Kumar Mishra

Hey, thanks for the correction on Suresh Kumar Mishra. I guess I need to do a little more research before assuming a no-name (auto)biographical entry. -charleca (talk) 16:12, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

:-) –Capricorn42 (talk) 16:14, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you for the comment on my talk page, much appreciated. – ukexpat (talk) 17:09, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!!

Mygerardromance (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my talk page, I really appreciate it. Mygerardromance (talk) 18:26, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Pesky vandal 66.39.232.254

You just reverted this persistent malefactor -- 66.39.232.254 -- at Meijer. I first encountered him at Elijah McCoy and reverted him. He needs 'a talkin' to and a blockin' too.' Can you help. Thanks. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 18:58, 14 January 2009 (UTC) Stan

He has been blocked for 3 months already. –Capricorn42 (talk) 19:02, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

A good thing, I think. Maybe it's a she? Happy editing. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 19:26, 14 January 2009 (UTC) Stan

His name is Bert I think, but who knows this is the internet. Happy editing –Capricorn42 (talk) 19:29, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Facing a problem regarding a page career launcher.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Career_launcher hello again I m facing a new problem regarding Career launcher page that I created previously,I am not getting why certain text is being highlighted with dotted rectangle. Plz tell me whats this problem abt. and how to get rid of this problem.

Latest Joseph Farah revert

I noticed you had to revert some page move vandalism on the Joseph Farah article. I've seen some in a similar fashion before, making me curious as to whether we may have a sockpuppet on our hands. WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 17:48, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the update. WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 18:17, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Brian Price

I am Brian Price and I was just editing the medal box to make it clearer and more legible. I didn't like the show/hide part on the medal table but was having trouble taking it off. If you could take that off it would be great :)

I am a bit new at this. People often ask me for a bio summary and so I send them here to view this page. I just want to make sure things are up to date.

Thanks

Brian Price

Done. –Capricorn42 (talk) 20:12, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

aeriwyn

Please watch out when you remove revisions. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. I removed the warning from my own account because it was a false positive.

I'm not Cluebot. You're supposed to report it here. –Capricorn42 (talk) 05:15, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

yes but you removed the revision of my own talk page after i removed the cluebot warning in my profile. hence why i marked it on your profile. -aeriwyn

Ah, your IP did you weren't logged in. :p Please ensure that you are logged in while removing stuff from your own talk page. –Capricorn42 (talk) 05:52, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Rule the Rail! article

I've removed the PROD template as it had already been deleted once; I've nominated it for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rule the Rail!. —Snigbrook 22:23, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks–Capricorn42 (talk) 05:14, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

! :@

I see no harm in my topic, don't see why it was deleted to be fair, bit fussy, no?

After all, anyone can edit :P

Matheaufrith (talk) 23:23, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Garbage articles are cleaned up regularly. I can't see your deleted contribs but I remember that your article was one of these three: patent nonsense, attack page, vandalism. –Capricorn42 (talk) 05:13, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

external links deleted

I noticed that "viralZone" links I added to virus pages have been deleted. This is a pity, because the links are pointing to an public academic database developed at the University of Geneva (switzerland and financed by public funds, including a NIH grant. Is it possible to add these links to wikipedia virus pages, or shall we abandon? I did not add links in order to spam anything, beut there are 291 known viral genera, so this could look like a spam when adding links and modifications to all relative pages.

I also updated some "unassigned" families, like endornavirus which are belonging now to endornaviridae, but these informations were deleted too!

regards

Philippe Le Mercier, PhD viralzone talk

Vandal warnings

Please do not add first, second, and final warnings at the same time as you did here and then report the user to AIV. A warning only serves it's purpose if the user has to time to read it and react to it. I'm not blocking the user because since the warning there has been no activity, and by reporting it to AIV before seeing if the warning had time to take effect you waste an admin's time. Incidentally I think there's a good chance the links in question were legitimate though it did look like a spam campaign.--Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 10:29, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

The links were added very rapidly so I reverted all of them with huggle and user received warnings with as much speed. The link addition was probably legitimate, I'll drop a note on their talk. –Capricorn42 (talk) 10:32, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm already working on it so don't worry.--Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 10:33, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your note on the users page. Also I don't use Huggle (never got beyond Twinkle) but if it drops three escalating warnings on a user talk page in the space of a minute and then reports the user to AIV there's nothing good about that. Premature AIV reports don't save anyone any time and in fact are a big time waster. Just my two cents.--Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 10:41, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Requirements of a president

I have nominated Requirements of a president, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Requirements of a president. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Elm-39 (talk) 15:52, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Article for deletion

I received a message the article I submitted has been "tagged" for deletion. That is fine.. I just did it becuase I was teasing/flirting with this girl and had every intention on deleting it myself before I went to bed....

Sorry for the inconvience

have a good day

Oglethorpe1983Oglethorpe1983 (talk) 09:24, 17 January 2009 (UTC) (hope I did that right...just saw the instruction on the tope of the page)

how could you revert so fast

i dont get it ^^—Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.66.189.224 (talk • contribs)

Headline

Hello Capicorn 42 I want to tell that those other edits are not made by me

I did an editing in the Anger Management Page because the Cameo means an appearance by a famous actor in a movie for a very short time..and those described in the cameo sections are not famous actors and they appear more than a cameo period of time.. that's why i did that edit

I did it for the article..if you don't want to put it delete it as you want—Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.144.8.15 (talk • contribs)

Unconstructive post?

I was just wondering why stating the Frank Houston was a pedophile was removed when in 2000 he was advised to resign his ministerial credentials by his own son, Brian Houston the National President of the Assemblies of God in Australia, after Houston confessed the sexual abuse of young male members of the congregation, living in Hillsong-owned accommodation until his death in 2004.

If someones father was Bin Laden you would say "known terrorist Bin Laden". Former race car driver, famous poet, etc. Brian's father had sex with little boys, what compels people to cover this fact up?

I will revert it until you show me exactly why it should not be stated. 121.218.88.246 (talk) 12:57, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. –Capricorn42 (talk) 13:19, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi

Hi Capricorn42, I apologize about my try to add external link in inappropriate places!

I would like to place the link about the site (http://www.thedownloadplanet.com/) on wikipedia.org. It is possible?

Thanks, Alex—Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.44.239.74 (talk • contribs)

Nope, see WP:SPAM, WP:EL. –Capricorn42 (talk) 15:02, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Username

Hey there. You recently tageed Yougottacall for SD written by User:Timtracey, who mentions himself in the article (Tim Tracey). I've never done it before, so I was wondering if there should be some sort of blocking for him, and if so, what the procedure for it is. Thanks! BobAmnertiopsis∴_ChatMe! 15:35, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Tim Tracey is probably their real name, I don't think blocking is justified at all. However a COI note on their talk page is necessary to inform the user about the policies. If the username was "Yougottacall" or something similar then it would've been a spamusername. Such reports are dealt with at WP:UAA. –Capricorn42 (talk) 15:40, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Burger King Zesty Sauce

Why was my Zesty Sauce page taken down? Is it because I used Burger King in the title? I'll gladly just change it to Zesty Sauce. I thought this was an interesting, missing subject - isn't that what this thing is for? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Welvis (talk • contribs)

Sweet Endeavours

Thank you for the feedback on whether Sweet Endeavours is notable enough to have a Wikipedia subcategory article under the category of chocolatiers. The company that I was referring to is not sweetendeavours.com, which you had mentioned in your response. The official Web site of Sweet Endeavours is www.chocolatines.com. Also, you can find at least five articles (e.g., Chicago Tribune, Daily Herald, L.A. Times, etc.) concerning Sweet Endeavours and its Chocolatines line.

Does this new information change your perspective as to the notability of Sweet Endeavours (chocolatines.com)? Thank you!

Kasumi

Jose Torres died today

Good Morning Capricorn42,

Jose Torres died today in is hometown of ponce, PR. You can confirm info in www.endi.com. THis is the website of the Puerto Rico most important newspaper. I was updating the info and I was going to put the sources of the info. Please update biography

Thanks,

Fernando

Done, thanks for providing cite. –Capricorn42 (talk) 14:01, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Sorry for that there

My "friend" was trying to be funny and get me banned, his name is james olliver he does not have an account here, but he uses ebay and stuff, he is pretty good on the internet he has been using it for 3 years now. Cammy274 (talk) 14:20, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

He got you indef. blocked anyway, bye –Capricorn42 (talk) 15:12, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Sunrise Fire

Hi Capricorn42. I was actually just about to write to you. I used this criteria as this page has already been deleted three times before (once in Dec 07 for no content), yesterday for advertising and today under A7 for not meeting inclusion criteria. I agree, I probably will need to start a debate. I just immediately thought G4 because of the article's previous. I done a google search and found nothing on the book besides what's on the publisher page. Thanks Olly¹⁵⁰ 18:16, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

No problem, Ttonyb1 has already added csd tag for non-notable story. That was probably the best solution. Case closed until round 4 :) Olly¹⁵⁰ 18:34, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

CardRunners

How do you figure CardRunners is not important? Do you know what that site is? It is a huge huge business and a monster in the poker world. They were one of the sponsors of the WSOP this year DegenFarang (talk) 07:39, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

My article

I'm just inquiring abot my recent article about MIDAS IT. I have reviewed all the logs and believe that my article is in no violation. Maybe you can pin point out some of the the content which caused my article's deletion. Cheers,—Preceding unsigned comment added by Midaswiki (talk • contribs)

Your article was deleted because it didn't assert the notability of the company/group in reliable sources. You can contest the deletion here. –Capricorn42 (talk) 02:26, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

German Shepherd Dog Club Of Pakistan

Hi I am Ahad Aftab Khan Lodhi I am Permenant Member Of the Kennel Club Of Pakistan and German Shepherd of Pakistan, a Registered breeder and Show Steward.I have the authority from the President of Kennel Club of Pakistan to use this information. Ahadaftab (talk) 04:14, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi, you might be having the authority to use it, but we don't have the copyright permissions to keep it unless you provide an OTRS ticket. To forward the permissions to Wikipedia you will have to follow instructions on this page. Another option is to re-write the article in your own words without infringing copyrights. –Capricorn42 (talk) 04:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

thankyou

thankyou for your help with my copyright question. (DrakeLuvenstein (talk) 06:14, 22 January 2009 (UTC))

How am I vandalizing?

I'm just fixing vandalistic errors from others..............—Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.246.176.152 (talk • contribs)

? ? ? ? –Capricorn42 (talk) 17:41, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

delete article and account

How do I delete an article that I have created and delete my account? thank you--Snorm1 (talk) 17:22, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Deleting an account is not possible, however you can WP:VANISH after changing username. To get an article created by you deleted add {{db-author}} at the top of it; if no other editor has contributed to it, an admin will delete the article. –Capricorn42 (talk) 17:26, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

?

Hey i'm just trying to make a page about ME, man! If you want proof, check this out: www.youtube.com/sylvangu2000—Preceding unsigned comment added by Sylvangu2000 (talk • contribs)

What, do you think, makes you notable?–Capricorn42 (talk) 19:17, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Check out our information regarding autobiographies also. لennavecia 19:18, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

I think he is notable DegenFarang (talk) 13:45, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Scott brunger

Hi there! I undid your undoing of your reversion on this article, as I took the spam links out, and your undoing of your reversion put them back in. Or something. Anyway, I didn't think they should be there, at least as long as the article still exists! That probably hasn't cleared anything up, but I thought I'd mention it anyway! --Ged UK (talk) 15:04, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

I get it, kinda. –Capricorn42 (talk) 15:29, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Well, it's gone now, so it's rather moot! --Ged UK (talk) 22:09, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

PayPal

Thanks for the message. I just wanted to add my referral link to paypal.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.115.129.192 (talk • contribs)

ty

thank you for creating Joint account. Cheers, Kingturtle (talk) 15:48, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

:) –Capricorn42 (talk) 15:53, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Many Thanks

72.66.3.14 (talk) 18:29, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

regarding gwalior trade fair.

Dude you were right i had copied it but it is freely available material,which donot come under copy right laws.plz explain me more clearly copy right laws.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Bashish (talk • contribs)

thnks but I am facing again a problem plz sort this out

As per your instruction I have written whole article in my own words ,but now it shows a message for heading conflict.

Is This acceptable.

Thanx for helping me,I have changed the article Gwalior trade fair plz give me some feed back ,so that I can eliminate my errors while writing.

?

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Toyota_Supra&curid=436580&diff=266338403&oldid=266337590

This can not be right.... Warrington (talk) 21:57, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

you do good work

I noticed you doing a lot of nice stuff at help and references desk type of places. If you're not into this kind of stuff, just delete. <barnstar>

IP address impersonation

Looks like I spoke too soon, eh? From this diff it appears that User:Anirban16Chatterjee may be directly involved in this mess. Can you check if his IP matches User_talk:117.201.96.78User_talk:117.201.96.68? -- 74.137.108.115 (talk) 10:28, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure it is related, that's why I asked the IP[1] not to log out to edit if he already has an account. My opinion is that we leave the issue here, if the user does that again it would be the time to submit an WP:SSP. Sorry I snipped a part of your comment as a courtesy to the user but put it back if you want. –Capricorn42 (talk) 11:54, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Sorry for forgetting the sources

Here you go: [2] [3] [4] "[Windows 7], it's Windows Vista, a lot better," said Ballmer during a 45-minute question-and-answer session hosted by a pair of Gartner Inc. analysts at the research firm's annual Symposium ITxpo in Orlando today. The interview was later posted as a webcast on the Gartner site. [5] Whytehorse1413 (talk) 12:57, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Speculations, not an official statement from Microsoft. Please Wikipedia is not a soapbox–Capricorn42 (talk) 12:59, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

So a statement by the CEO of Microsoft is speculation? Seriously, are you employed by Microsoft directly or indirectly?Whytehorse1413 (talk) 13:41, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm a Linux user who doesn't hate Microsoft or Apple. You are interpreting Ballmer's words incorrectly. If you read that article again, you will find this para where he clearly states that Windows 7 will be a major release.

“ Ballmer also took exception to the idea that Windows 7 will be a minor release or a spit polish on Vista. "It's a real release," he said, "because it's a lot more work than a minor release. It turns out you can [do] more than just a minor release in what is essentially a two-and-a-half-year period of time. There's no reason to do just 'a minor release' in two and a half years." ”

[6]

Your words: " If this is the exact same horrible OS, people should know" clearly indecate your anti-MS POV. Please stop it. The sources you brought here are contradicting your own assertion. –Capricorn42 (talk) 13:48, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

If you keep reading, you will also see:

“ The major/minor release question has plagued Microsoft since shortly after Vista was released, when company executives seemed to say that it planned to update its operating system on an alternating basis, with the major updates -- what Vista was to XP, for example -- every four years, with minor updates in between. By that map, Windows 7 would be a "minor" update, since Vista was "major." ”

Neutrality aside, Vista was a horrible OS and that's a fact, not just my opinion. I leave you to dissect millions of expert reports for sourcesWhytehorse1413 (talk) 14:03, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Those are not Ballmer's words, its the author of the story saying that and then too, nowhere in the quote did the author say that Windows 7 is really a minor update; he is trying to "map" something in the last sentence.(Gregg Keizer's original research, speculation, prediction?)

Please keep your opinions to yourself. WP:STICK applies now, if you want to further debate this then go to Talk:Windows 7 to get another audience. I have some other, more productive work to do. Bye.–Capricorn42 (talk) 14:24, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

advertisement

Hello,

You've stated that the article I've written reads like an advertisement. I've added factual information about our company - which part makes it sound like an advert so that I can correct it? I don't want anyone to think we're using wikipedia for advertising.

Servevast Ltd

Mynameispritch (talk)

I saw the very big logo of the company at the top of the article, pictures of refrigerators etc. so I tagged it {{advert}}. (as it looked more like a business brochure than Wikipedia article)

FYI: You say that its your company, so you have a conflict of interest. Creating and editing articles related to you or your company is discouraged but not forbidden. Somebody has tagged it for deletion now, due to notability concerns, but in case the article is not deleted, please keep the COI guideline in mind before editing the article. –Capricorn42 (talk) 15:45, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

User talk:68.12.63.88

Don't just delete the entire user talk page when you want to add your own comment, as you did with User talk:68.12.63.88. Raeky (talk) 06:09, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

I removed the warnings because I felt those weren't appropriate. Two of those warnings were my own, one was ClueBot.–Capricorn42 (talk) 06:11, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

what's the deal?

dude, what's the deal? why do people keep deleting my link??? i posted somethin already in the talk section, stating the specific guideline that applies directly to my site... this joe schmo big toe... people take one at the hand written material and assume i couldn't design graphics or something... totally miss the point... this is legit... like for dummies type legit... i dont know to much about wiki-politics, but what's it take to keep that thing posted? Joshebosh (talk) 06:39, 27 January 2009 (UTC) http://htmlalphabet.com

The HTML article already has a lot of links. See WP:EL & WP:NOT, Wikipedia is not a collection of links. Its good that you have posted on the talk page of the article, now let the other regular contributors watching that page decide whether or not your link will improve the article - that is if it provides anything beneficial that is not already covered in the article or the present external links. Your link was once reviewed and removed by an editor here.

Also see WP:COI - you are discouraged to be editing/introducing anything related to you or your work. –Capricorn42 (talk) 06:51, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Message from 121.242.55.30

121.242.55.30 (talk) 08:44, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Dear Capricornm 42 why are you deleting the matter from the website? Itsa new updation ? any issues?121.242.55.30 (talk) 08:44, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

See WP:BFAQ - I reverted resort advert [7] –Capricorn42 (talk) 12:57, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Excuse me!

Sorry to disturb you Sir, but yesterday (in our time) I again noticed that the charge of sockpuppetry has been brought against me on my talk page. And there, you further wrote that, you left a message on my IP talk page on the issue as some warning. But I did not receive a single message from you on my IP talk page. I am sorry for editing the signatures of the Sinebot on multiple issues, but that I've explained on my talk page. Now, to prove that my IP address is different from the one, I am logging out to edit. Anirban16chatterjee (talk) 05:25, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Now I am logged out and I am reediting the page. You can see that my IP address resembles that of the person, but mine one is not the same as his one. Further, you may check out the talk page of my IP address to find out whether any message from you came on the particular day or not as warning. And, for the first time, I did not protest in any kind of way, because I did not have any proof of supporting myself. I hope you can check out from my IP address that I am the person are not the same. (Although mine one resembles his, please take a closer look to find that they are different finally). 117.201.98.22 (talk) 05:32, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Please. You have a dynamic IP and the message I left you can be seen here. You might not be aware of the policies, see WP:SOCK and WP:CHECKUSER and stop creating new accounts. The whole point was to stop you from socking and disrupting RD/C. Don't deny it, just get real and start contributing constructively without creating dramaz. –Capricorn42 (talk) 06:57, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

So, shall I consider the matter to be ended herein? (I still don't understand everything but promise not to alter the signs of Sinebots in the future). Anirban16chatterjee (talk) 08:29, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

re: edits

Hi!

I have noticed you have been noticing my edits and changing them

Why may I ask?

Everything I have put down, while it may be heresay, is as historically accurate as the works of Herodotus, which were also heresay.

Kind Regards,

Edito—Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.105.11.238 (talk • contribs)

thanks

Thanks Capricorn42, for correcting my speedy delete pick, am an eternal newb with the tools – :P Julia Rossi (talk) 09:43, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome, –Capricorn42 (talk) 09:54, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Msg

Sorry, I'm new to Wikipedia and it seems I might have compromised some of the guidelines inadvertantly. I'll do my best to remedy this (Achishol (talk) 11:16, 28 January 2009 (UTC))

About the Vandalism in WP:NOWRITE

I looked up WHOIS, and 124.180.138.86 and 121.214.159.233 seem to be the same person. RageAgainstTheWikiMachine (Pen name of Mydoctor93) 13:11, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Bhaktababa again

I was going to ask you but didn't want to bother you. I thought it could be contested on the talk page, not by an edit note and removal, and the edit note didn't really support the deletion give founded reasons for deletion. Is it worth going to AfD? If so what is the link for that? Thanks, Cap42 –– Julia Rossi (talk) 05:27, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Changed my mind and took it off unwatch. Giving this one a wide... Julia Rossi (talk) 05:38, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi, Cap, thanks. It was a combination of frustration that this user seemed to be on a mission, then on a roll, and no way could I avoid giving the attention it was after. Sheesh. :| I'll take a couple of breaths and, you never know... :) Julia Rossi (talk) 06:10, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Oka-ay, I've got the little popup xfd box going, but stuck at the no-include wrap thingy and have a question about the reason: is it enough to say it's about non-notable Indian saint and full of redlink support? I guess there's always a first time... (hope you're still around) Julia Rossi (talk) 06:21, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Cool. Thanks so much, Julia Rossi (talk) 06:25, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Hooks

Hi, I think it's because somehow I can figure a good "hook" so any time you need one or help with one, let me know! (and seem to get an article over the line for other people too) ~:) Julia Rossi (talk) 07:33, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Ok, thanks,  :] –Capricorn42 (talk) 08:16, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Surprises

To my surprise, his article is now getting support at the delete discussion page. I can;t believe it, can socks be revealed in that context, or would that give them even more sympathy? Julia Rossi (talk) 20:42, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the update saint Cap, likewise, :\. The entertainment was that he used other non-notable "saints" to be socks of each other in the article. Oh well, saint Julia Rossi (talk) 02:31, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Thank you for the trust you placed in me by supporting my RfA (which passed and, apparently, I am now an admin!). I will do my best to continue to act in a way that is consistent with the policies of wikipedia as well with our common desire to build and perfect this repository of human knowledge; and can only hope that you never feel that your trust was misplaced. Thanks again! --Regent's Park (Rose Garden) 23:07, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

cool :)—Preceding unsigned comment added by Vultureman (talk • contribs)

Inauguration of Barack Obama

This user helped promote Inauguration of Barack Obama to good article status.

Thank you for the editorial assistance that you gave to help improve this article. Keep up the good work as we try to take this article to WP:FA.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 07:18, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

I wish I had done something like that, but actually all my edits to that article are vandalism reverts, not content contribution. Good luck to you for the FA nom of this article. –Capricorn42 (talk) 10:00, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Resolve to Evolve Scholarship deleted

Hello, Will you please explain to me why my entry (which I was still in the process of editing) was deleted? I saw something about "soapboxing" or "promotion", but I don't feel that is a fair depiction of this entry. I am publishing information about a unique scholarship created by my company, one which offers thousands of dollars to aspiring college students each year. Will you please help me understand why web content is off limits or seems to be? I have found many entries in wikipedia that "promote" websites over the years. For example, Heather Armstrong, who pays her bills with advertising on her website:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dooce

How is this not promoting her site? I realize it is not the intention, but it does, in the end, promote her site, which, in turn, pays her bills. And she's not offering thousands of dollars to prospective students. Please advise. Thanks, Kevin

chicagoscholar Chicagoscholar (talk) 17:37, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi, the article you created was deleted because it didn't assert the notability of the scholarship website, and was mildly promotional, as you said yourself, you work for that company (see WP:COI). Dooce's article is there because she appears to be notable —CNN and BBC have written about her. If you want to create that article you will have to show how the subject is notable; notability is not measured by how many thousand dollars they are offering to students, its determined by reliable sources. So try to add as many secondary sources you can to the article. –Capricorn42 (talk) 17:50, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Much Appreciated

Hello Capricorn42, Thank you for the insight. I understand your concern and appreciate your efforts here. We have been mentioned by many news outlets over the years and I will be sure to reference them in the next iteration. Also, we have a list of all the scholars who benefited from the scholarship over the last three years. I will get the complete article up-front and publish it all at once this time. My intention last time was to come back when I had the remaining info and publish it, but I didn't get the chance. Thanks again. Kevin

Hello Capricorn42, Should I create a new page or update the existing one? I am also considering creating a separate page with just the history and pertinent information about Scholarships.com. Please advise. Thanks, Kevin Chicagoscholar (talk) 19:24, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

He was making a warning

Just tested how he handles vandalism 59.96.11.181 (talk) 09:28, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: User:86.158.233.205

Kinda vaguely - I've tried to pull away from that some as the situation became a little more unclear, and I don't think the sockpuppetry/block evasion is entirely intentional. His service provider jumps around too much, to the point we'd need to hardblock a few /16 (really big) IP ranges, which I don't see as worth it. I'll keep an eye on it, though. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 22:00, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply, meanwhile the IP was blocked by CU Nishkid64–Capricorn42 (talk) 15:06, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Golden Barny!

Capricorn42 is rocking!!! --KnowledgeHegemony ^talk 11:11, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks :)–Capricorn42 (talk) 09:26, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Parappa665

There seems to be nothing on your page, so I decided to leave something on your page to add one. When most people's talk pages are blank, I add one to turn the nothing into one message. Parappa665 (talk) 18:54, 12 March 2009 (UTC)