User talk:Carbrera/Archive 15

December 2020

Hi so I would like to discuss about The Ready Set Wikipedia page. I would like to know why you got rid of some of the chart positions? Jordantrsonlychild (talk) 00:38, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jordantrsonlychild – WP:CHARTMATH. The Bubbling Under Hot 100 is an extension of the Hot 100 chart. They should never be used simultaneously together, as the Hot 100 position is always the higher of the two. The New Zealand column was removed because the one source being used to back it up is a dead link with no date or access date, which leads me to believe it could be fake. Carbrera (talk) 00:48, 19 December 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Thank you for getting back to me. I appreciate you for letting me know how the Bubbling Under Hot 100 and the Hot 100 charts work. As for the New Zealand charts, I found a reliable source that shows the song Give Me Your Hand charted in New Zealand. It’s from the official New Zealand Top 40 charts. Take a look: https://nztop40.co.nz/chart/singles?chart=2152 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jordantrsonlychild (talk • contribs) 00:56, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Brief Moment (song)

The article Brief Moment (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Brief Moment (song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:02, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This review went very well, but do you think you could maybe take on one of my articles now to return the favor, as I have done a lot of reviews for you but no articles have been reviewing vice versa yet? --K. Peake 09:40, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Peake – sure. Several years ago I was very active in that but I've taken a pretty long break from it. I'll need some time before completing one. Carbrera (talk) 19:05, 20 December 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Your GA nomination of Kiss in Songs

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kiss in Songs you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 18:41, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Kiss in Songs

The article Kiss in Songs you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Kiss in Songs for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 10:01, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Buzzfeed as a reliable source

"There is consensus that BuzzFeed News is generally reliable." That's from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benicio2020 (talk • contribs) 00:47, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Benicio2020 – that's true. But the sources you added were from BuzzFeed, not BuzzFeed News. Carbrera (talk) 01:08, 25 December 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Letsgotobedcover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Letsgotobedcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:34, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 26, 2020

I would like to know how https://acharts.co/song/67633 is an unreliable source. Is there any proof that it is? I just want to know. Thank you Jordantrsonlychild (talk) 22:12, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jordantrsonlychild – aCharts is listed at WP:BADCHARTS as a "non-notable chart with dubious methodology" per this discussion. Carbrera (talk) 22:15, 26 December 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Why is it though? And what does it mean exactly? Jordantrsonlychild (talk) 22:16, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jordantrsonlychild – it means aCharts likely obtains their information through their own means and not through official sources. aCharts is not the official chart archive for Portugal, but rather portuguesecharts.com. The official profile for "Music Sounds Better with You" is posted here, which reveals the song did not enter the charts in that country. Carbrera (talk) 22:22, 26 December 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Alright I didn’t know that thanks Jordantrsonlychild (talk) 22:24, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Santa Baby, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CDR.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Kiss in Songs

The article Kiss in Songs you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kiss in Songs for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:02, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Harajuku Girls (song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harajuku Girls (song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harajuku Girls (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

HĐ (talk) 10:50, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the 2021 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. We thank Vanamonde93 and Godot13, who have retired as judges, and we thank them for their past dedication. The judges for the WikiCup this year are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:10, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

EarOne a chart?

Alright, since you seem to believe EarOne is a chart, you need to open a discussion on WP:CHARTS on why you believe it’s appropriate to include. If you can’t do this then I would recommend stop adding it as a chart on Let Me Reintroduce Myself because you either have to follow “FIMI” or “Hung Meiden” which are listed on WP:GOODCHARTS. EarOne is just a radio station in Italy, not an actual chart company. This is the first time I’ve ever seen anyone try to include EarOne in a chart section of any song. Pillowdelight (talk) 01:28, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pillowdelight – I found the tone of your message to be rather rude and I do not appreciate it. EarOne is not a chart, nor is it a radio station. They are a company that publishes radio adds obtained from official sources (Parlophone, Universal Music Group, Warner) for 189 Italian-language airplay channels in the country. Just because you have not seen something before does not mean it is incorrect. Carbrera (talk) 01:50, 2 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]

@Carbrera: My “tone” was not rude at all. I’m informing you need to open a discussion on why you believe it is appropriate to include this as a chart, I don’t care if EarOne is not a radio station, they run many stations in Italy. It also has never been proven that labels send out their songs specifically to Italy— with no announcement from the artist or label whatsoever. For all we know they could easily be an unreliable source. Just my opinion. It should also be common sense that EarOne isn’t even a chart company— which you seemingly admitted— so if it’s not a chart company then stop adding it.

Pillowdelight (talk) 02:35, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pillowdelight – If you feel my inclusion of this information is inappropriate, then it would be best for you to take it up with WP:CHARTS like you initially suggested. I, under no current Wikipedia policy, have to do this to prove one of my good-faith edits on an article that I edit. It seems that others have agreed with my edit too. Your condescension is not welcome on my talk page. Carbrera (talk) 02:51, 2 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Your GA nomination of Salt (Oh Land song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Salt (Oh Land song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 10:01, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Salt (Oh Land song)

The article Salt (Oh Land song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Salt (Oh Land song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 18:01, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It has been four days by now, will you be going over the issues soon? --K. Peake 12:34, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Harajuku Girls (song)

Hey, I don't want to sound patronizing, but I know how it feels when things don't work out your way. I admit some of my edits came off as impatient and rushed. I however hope that you know I assume good faith, as I (personally) don't see the need to create articles for songs that do not receive much independent coverage (To think, there are quite a few articles about non-notable songs out there). I appreciate your efforts with Gwen Stefani-related articles, and hope that you won't be dissuaded by the AFD this time. HĐ (talk) 23:38, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HĐ – thank you for the follow-up message. I truly believe you assume good faith in your contributions, and your editing history speaks for itself. I am not upset or harbor any hard feelings toward you. Personally, I rarely engage in AfD discussions and usually just manually redirect obvious cases of articles with notability concerns myself. Sometimes I disagree with the outcomes of AfD, but I won't lose any sleep over it. Carbrera (talk) 21:07, 17 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Your GA nomination of Salt (Oh Land song)

The article Salt (Oh Land song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Salt (Oh Land song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 22:01, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Electra Heart (song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Electra Heart (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Ultimate Boss -- The Ultimate Boss (talk) 07:21, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Electra Heart (song)

The article Electra Heart (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Electra Heart (song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Ultimate Boss -- The Ultimate Boss (talk) 02:41, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Electra Heart (song)

The article Electra Heart (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Electra Heart (song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Ultimate Boss -- The Ultimate Boss (talk) 08:01, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LDLY.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LDLY.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:03, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Real Thing (Gwen Stefani song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Real Thing (Gwen Stefani song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Real Thing (Gwen Stefani song) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

HĐ (talk) 10:40, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Long Way to Go (Gwen Stefani and André 3000 song)

Hello again. I hope you are doing well and staying safe. I was wondering if it would be okay for me to work on the "Long Way to Go" (Gwen Stefani and André 3000 song) article? I did the GAN review for it all the way back in 2016, but I would like improve it further and incorporate new sources that came out with the album's 15th anniversary. I did not want to make any changes without your permission though first as you are the primary contributor to the article (and a majority if not all of the Gwen Stefani articles). On a somewhat related note, I am excited for Stefani's upcoming album, particularly if she continues with the ska direction again. Aoba47 (talk) 20:45, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have already started to collect sources in my sandbox. I am little concerned that the article may not met WP:NSONG since almost all of the coverage on the song is restricted to album reviews. That being said though, I'd still like to try and improve the article if possible. Aoba47 (talk) 21:23, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aoba47 – of course, you may. I highly value your contributions to Wikipedia and would never expect you to ask permission from me in editing! I have plans to revisit some of my older good articles and make major edits if necessary, since I am now much more knowledgeable about site policies and MoS guidelines than I was five years ago. With that being said, that will definitely require a lengthy span of time from me to complete. And yes, I am quite excited for the next album too. I've been craving new music outside of Shelton features and Christmas songs. Reportedly the next single is called "Cry Happy", but nothing has been confirmed yet. Carbrera (talk) 22:30, 10 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Thank you for the response. I have learned a lot over the years about Wikipedia so you are not alone there. I have already started collecting sources in my sandbox. I chose this particular song as it is such an oddball on the album lol. "Cry Happy" seems like a promising song title. I'd be interested to see when she would drop more music. Btw, Kelly Clarkson did a cover of "Misery" on her talk show if you haven't already seen it lol. Aoba47 (talk) 00:07, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Here This Christmas

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Here This Christmas you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 06:41, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Here This Christmas

The article Here This Christmas you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Here This Christmas for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 12:21, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Here This Christmas

The article Here This Christmas you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Here This Christmas for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:02, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Serious (Gwen Stefani song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Serious (Gwen Stefani song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serious (Gwen Stefani song) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

HĐ (talk) 06:06, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Long Way to Go (Gwen Stefani and André 3000 song) follow-up

Hello again. Sorry for the repeat message for this article. I have decided to not work on it, but if you ever need the sources that I found, then please let me know. I was able to track down articles on Newspapers.com and I am pretty confident that I have gathered all the appropriate sources on this song. I am just a little uncertain about the notability as it seems to be in the gray area where the sample has gotten some coverage, but I am not sure if it really reaches significant coverage. Just wanted to let you know in case you wanted to work on the article yourself as you can use the sources I found. Apologies in advance for how I structured the citations as I am trying out a different style. Aoba47 (talk) 18:26, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aoba47 – Thank you very much for your hard work on this. You've obviously put a lot of thought and time into your research. Your editing is always top-notch and, while I've always preferred the ease of the citation template, I'm more impressed when editors go the extra mile and lay them out to a specific style instead. I'll let you know if I return to the article soon. Best, Carbrera (talk) 15:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Your GA nomination of Replanting Family Tree

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Replanting Family Tree you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:02, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Replanting Family Tree

The article Replanting Family Tree you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Replanting Family Tree for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 11:02, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Replanting Family Tree

The article Replanting Family Tree you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Replanting Family Tree for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:42, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Invincible Overlord songs has been nominated for deletion

Category:Invincible Overlord songs has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Richhoncho (talk) 19:26, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2021 March newsletter

Round 1 of the competition has finished; it was a high-scoring round with 21 contestants scoring more than 100 points. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 55 contestants qualifying. You will need to finish among the top thirty-two contestants in Round 2 if you are to qualify for Round 3. Our top scorers in Round 1 were:

Epicgenius led the field with a featured article, nine good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 945 points.
Bloom6132 was close behind with 896 points, largely gained from 71 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
ImaginesTigers, who has been editing Wikipedia for less than a year, was in third place with 711 points, much helped by bringing League of Legends to featured article status, exemplifying how bonus points can boost a contestant's score.
Amakuru came next with 708 points, Kigali being another featured article that scored maximum bonus points.
Ktin, new to the WikiCup, was in fifth place with 523 points, garnered from 15 DYKs and 34 "In the news" items.
The Rambling Man scored 511 points, many from featured article candidate reviews and from football related DYKs.
Gog the Mild, last year's runner-up, came next with 498 points, from a featured article and numerous featured article candidate reviews.
Hog Farm, at 452, scored for a featured article, four good articles and a number of reviews.
Le Panini, another newcomer to the WikiCup, scored 438 for a featured article and three good articles.
Lee Vilenski, last year's champion, scored 332 points, from a featured article and various other sport-related topics.

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. In Round 1, contestants achieved eight featured articles, three featured lists and one featured picture, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. They completed 97 good article reviews, nearly double the 52 good articles they claimed. Contestants also claimed for 135 featured article and featured list candidate reviews. There is no longer a requirement to mention your WikiCup participation when undertaking these reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or something else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:25, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fake Woke reference deletion and revert

At Fake Woke, what reason is there for having the content below repeated five times within a reference?

"Fake Woke – Single – Tom MacDonald". Apple Music (CA). Retrieved 3 February 2021.

It adds no value to the reference. David notMD (talk) 14:33, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

David notMD – It's not the same reference. Five different territories are listed to support the claims of the "Various" row in the "Release history" section. Not all singles are released internationally, and some Apple Music releases are territory-exclusive. When you edited the page, you removed all 5 references and only left the descriptive text without an explanation, so I reverted it. Carbrera (talk) 14:57, 2 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Nomination of Feel the Love (Kids See Ghosts song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Feel the Love (Kids See Ghosts song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AfD discussion title until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

The Ultimate Boss (talk) 23:10, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Kill for Candy

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kill for Candy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 00:21, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Kill for Candy

The article Kill for Candy you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Kill for Candy for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 04:01, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Money Can't Buy You Class

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Money Can't Buy You Class you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 20:42, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Money Can't Buy You Class

The article Money Can't Buy You Class you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Money Can't Buy You Class for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 11:41, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been onhold for nearly a week now, so I would like to ask when will you try to implement the changes by? --K. Peake 06:58, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Peake – I will work on that GAN today. Sorry, I have been rather busy lately. Carbrera (talk) 15:01, 12 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Your GA nomination of Kill for Candy

The article Kill for Candy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kill for Candy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 19:02, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

help new article fa.wikipedia

hello dear Carbrera

I made this article Iranian musician new page I am active on fa.wikipedia.org and my user page on fa wiki is [1] this article name is Draft:Hooshyar khayam (musician) check him and tell me about problem this article.

I would made iranian article not on en.wikipedia.org and make certificate pages was made on fa.wikipedi.org.

at last just tell me is it ok or not ??

and check this new draft article thanks.

have good time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymous Mamad (talk • contribs) 20:14, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous Mamad – hello, but I am not sure I understand what you want me to review in this article. If you are asking about its notability, I would have to say I may not be the best person to ask. I am afraid I have not heard of Hooshyar Khayam before, but that does not mean the subject is not notable. I wish I could be of more help. Best, Carbrera (talk) 04:31, 16 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]

thanks for your help yes this person is one of the best musician iranian guys he work on pop music iran thanks for your answer and review my question about article on fa wiki

i want create new article on en wiki article about place and person ,.... on fa and translate this article to en wiki i want review this article and tell me about technical issues should be Observe on article enwiki is it good article or not (my question means), thanks alot.Anonymous Mamad (talk) 05:25, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hey there, I hope you are doing well. I believe we do not have bad blood even though I got strong opinions on previous AFDs, which, while stemmed from my good faith, came off as rather pushy and aggressive. This is to clear things up that my intentions were by no means malicious, and my experiences with AFDs certainly helped me recognize certain things.

On another note, I wonder if you remember me asking for your experience in architecture some time in the past. Given that SNS may be rather risky, do you mind if I contact you via Wikipedia email? Nothing serious, just some Q&As about architecture in general. Hope you are staying healthy and safe during these uncertain times. Best, HĐ (talk) 04:28, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HĐ – Hello. I hope all is well with you too. I just think we're both, seemingly, very passionate people who care a lot about Wikipedia. I do mind at all, and I would be quite happy to help. I'm actually entering graduate school this fall and really need to start transitioning back to that part of my life. I have recently updated my email on here anyway so feel free to get in contact when you have a chance. Best wishes, Carbrera (talk) 16:03, 14 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Your GA nomination of Money Can't Buy You Class

The article Money Can't Buy You Class you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Money Can't Buy You Class for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 15:42, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of All of the Dead Girls

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article All of the Dead Girls you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of RunningTiger123 -- RunningTiger123 (talk) 17:22, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Slow Clap" (song) lauds

Hello again. I just wanted to say awesome work with the "Slow Clap" (song) article. I am very impressed with how much you did in such a short amount of time. Aoba47 (talk) 00:39, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aoba47 – thank you very much for the kind words. I'm hoping to add some more to it next time I get a chance. Carbrera (talk) 03:20, 15 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Best of luck with it! Aoba47 (talk) 03:31, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. I just wanted to say congrats about getting a DYK hook for this article. I have not participated in the DYK space in a very long time so it was a welcome surprise to see this article linked on the front page. It made me wonder if there would ever be a music video for this song or how the album roll-out will continue in the future. Aoba47 (talk) 04:03, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Aoba47. Personally, I feel like a video will be made, but I am unsure about how the album will premiere. Honestly, since only one source has listed Let Me Reintroduce Myself as the album's name, I am a bit skeptical if that is truly the real title too. Carbrera (talk) 21:50, 3 April 2021 (UTC).[reply]

I agree that a video will likely be made, but I think it is a little odd that one has not been released already to help the song commercially. I do not think there has been any real news about the album's release, and I doubt that the album would be named after the single, but you never know. I am skeptical about that as well. Aoba47 (talk) 00:25, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of All of the Dead Girls

The article All of the Dead Girls you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:All of the Dead Girls for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of RunningTiger123 -- RunningTiger123 (talk) 03:41, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification

Hello, Carbrera. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

HĐ (talk) 14:46, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Slow Clap (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of I Am Real

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article I Am Real you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lil-unique1 -- Lil-unique1 (talk) 22:21, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello QT, just wanted to let you know that I've reviewed and I think it's not far off. Let's say seven days to review? Ping me when you've done and I'll review again :) ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 23:05, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of All of the Dead Girls

The article All of the Dead Girls you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:All of the Dead Girls for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of RunningTiger123 -- RunningTiger123 (talk) 19:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of I Am Real

The article I Am Real you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:I Am Real for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lil-unique1 -- Lil-unique1 (talk) 23:21, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]