User talk:Comparativist1

Mistakes in the Great school article

There are certain differences between this one and the article on the same subject on the Serbian wikipedia. Actually, there are three articles on this subject there: The first Great school (1808-1813), The Belgrade lyceum (1838-1863), and The second Great school (1863-1905). Your article here makes a little confusion between the first and the second Great school, so it would be nice if these discrepancies were corrected. This way, the article provides some false informations.--Vitriden (talk) 12:55, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:File:Djura danicic.jpg

This file was moved to Commons from English Wikipedia, but some description information may have got lost in the process.

As you are noted as the original uploader, or in the history for the file, it would be appreciated if you could help in reconstructing this information.

Please also consider checking Commons for other media that you may have uploaded locally, but which was subsequently transferred.

Special:Log for uploads can help in this.

Thanks for you assistance and keep uploading 'free' media :)

It would be nice to know it's not from a gallery that's going to complain. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:51, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

University of Belgrade

With that article, it was a new assessment, which I do for all articles add to the University WikiProject. With those I do a fairly quick skimming looking for key items. It is very accurate for the classification system, but it is not fool proof for providing an overall "where is this article at right now". So, the points I picked up on are that it has a fair amount of sources, but does need more. And more importantly, it needs more that are independent of the school, such as books, newspapers, journals, etc. Next, it is missing some standard sections such as campus and student life, see Wikipedia:College and university article guidelines for more details on content and format in general. Lastly, don't bookend text with images on either side, spread out the images, or cut some. Hope this helps. Aboutmovies (talk) 19:51, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Hi, Viktore! :) Thanks for your fine contribution. I wanted to ask you fro you help. I an founder of Wikipedia:WikiProject Cultural Property of Great Importance, and numerous cultural institutions are under that list. I wanted to ask you to expand Dositej's Liceum article, with some of the material you have and know, as that building is Monument of Culture of Exceptional Importance. Thank you for you cooperation.

I will find it! :) You may ask me for anything regarding Culture of Serbia, that is my section of interest! :) All best! --Tadija^speaks 20:06, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He, he... You mean Dositej Obradović? :) OO, yes, sorry, I thought that you didnt find article, and asked for article creaton. Well on Sr wiki sr:Доситеј Обрадовић we can find more. I will try that also! --Tadija^speaks 20:15, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks! I hvala! :) --Tadija^speaks 20:22, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!
I noticed you've made edits to Cultural Property of Great Importance articles or that you are in some way connected to Serbia and Cultural Heritage. I thought you may be interested in joining
WikiProject Cultural Property of Great Importance

We are a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Serbian Cultural Property of Great Importance. Please take a look to edit an article or add one of your own. If you would be interested in joining feel free to visit the Participants Page!
Thank You. Tadija^speaks 19:41, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WOOW!

You are marvelous! That article is great! It look so good! Cant believe it! I am so happy! :) Kralju! --Tadija^speaks 12:15, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		For wonderful expansion of Museum of Vuk and Dositej article. Tadija^speaks 12:50, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ovo je najmanje što mogu da učinim. OVaj WikiProjekat mi mnogo znači, i puno ti hvala na pomoći. Nadam se da ćemo sarađivati i dalje! :) --Tadija^speaks 12:50, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well deserved! All best! :) --Tadija^speaks 13:04, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Museum of Vuk and Dositej

On May 13, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Museum of Vuk and Dositej, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Yugoslav Reparations

Thanks for the fine article. I wondered if you had any more details about the Brandt-Tito agreement, specifically the Brion formula. I take Brion to be the Yugoslav location of the talks.

As a former danube swabian I am particularly interested in the decision by the FRG to provide reparations for the folksdojcer I was unaware that this had occured, since I live in the US, but there is apparently a new restitution bill before the Seian parliament and the discussions about this made me aware of the Brandt-Tito agreement. I am also led to understand that there was also an agreement with Austria, but I know of no details about that at all. Thanks for any further information you can supply. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imersion (talk • contribs) 22:20, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. When you recently edited Subotica Law School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macedonia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

previous accounts

You should document your previous accounts per policy at WP:Multiple Accounts and WP:Clean start.

For example, place {{User previous account|Comparativist}} at your user page. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 14:43, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject University of Belgrade -> University of Belgrade task force

Why a WikiProject instead of a task force under WikiProject Belgrade and WikiProject Serbia? See WikiProjects that deal with science, technology, and engineering.--Zoupan 14:59, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nema na čemu. -- Bojan Talk 23:54, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invite! My main interest is Serbian classical music, hence my question about the music faculty. Oh, and I have also been foolishly sucked into "defending" Serbian names on en.wp :) In ictu oculi (talk) 10:15, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your invitation. However, I guess I won't be able to contribute to that project. Wish you all the best. Cheers. CeeGee (talk) 13:13, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Joy, you are invited!

If you named the project "University of Belgrade", then its purpose is to cover the University of Belgrade, not semi-random other things. If you want a more generic project, start one. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 19:03, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject

Are you sure about new wikiproject? Maybe just task force? I am afraid about scope... :( --WhiteWriter^speaks 16:27, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

From your work I see that you are the expert here. I am not so much on Wikipedia, but I wanted to find a way to direct some more attention to the University of Belgrade and regional higher education issues. What is the difference between a project and a task force? I trust you know better ;) --Comparativist1 (talk) 17:26, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, wikiProject is used for massive scope, like countries, big lists, etc. This project can have big scope, if we include in that scope biographies of people who finished under this university. And WikiProject is opened indefinitely. Otherwise, task force is opened for some specific task, and can be closed after the task is done. Anyway, nothing if wrong, it can stay like WP, but ALL of the red link below the template should be created...

Template:WikiProject University of Belgrade

That is the small problem.. :) On the other side, University of Belgrade can (and is) under the scope of poor WikiProject Belgrade, that is almost inactive. So, that is my problem. I am all for having more WP's, but someone should work on them! :) Anyway, lets leave it! I already created few. You should continue! :) --WhiteWriter^speaks 20:42, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you mean and I share your opinion - too many projects and too few people. :( I hope to work on the red links sometime soon - there's a lot of them :D Btw, there's also one person trying to insert a bot/alert, but reportedly it still needs some setting up. I have also somewhat extended the scope (see Other universities and schools) to attract users interested in higher education institutions in the region. Including the University of Belgrade alumni and faculty is a great idea!!! The only thing is that I am affraid to do it now. We would need more people to do that. And yes, I don't want this to be 'my project', I've just launched the thing. Hopefully people will become interested... Thanks for your valuable support!!! Pozdrav --Comparativist1 (talk) 21:00, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, see my contribution. I already established it. So, we will have to use it. Now, add {{WikiProject University of Belgrade|class=?????|importance=????}} (replace ???? with assessment) to the all related articles talkpages, so we can expand the scope, in order to allow establishment of assessment box. Pozdrav takođe... :)--WhiteWriter^speaks 21:07, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And see this edit of mine. In this way you should assess all articles you see or create. That addition fills this table in your/our wikiproject. Class are quality, and Importance, as you see, Top, High, Mid, Low. Also, on the top of the talkpage add {{talkpage}}, it is useful for new users. :) --WhiteWriter^speaks 21:17, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Added AA. Will be in a few days, but we should tag the articles, and AA will be more efficient. It works only within tagged articles. --WhiteWriter^speaks 21:22, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, i have to tell you... If you are adding, add all other ones, with copy paste system, and just assessment add.

{{talkpage}}
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Serbia|class=|importance=}}
{{WikiProject Belgrade|class=|importance=}} (if related)
{{WikiProject University of Belgrade|class=|importance=}}
}}

Then you are expanding all projects, with just one add... :) And dont worry, this can be done all the time. It is impossible to tag all of those at once.. :) --WhiteWriter^speaks 21:32, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a whole lot! I have done most of the stuff. These days when I have more time I will provide further input. I was also thinking of making user templates for students and graduates of other universities in Serbia (the ones that have a seal upoaded). What do you think, is it a good idea? --Comparativist1 (talk) 16:16, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I was unaware that the seal in not allowed to be used, so there would have to be alternative solutions. For the University of Belgrade I've used the flag of Belgrade, because it's similar.--Comparativist1 (talk) 16:54, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:University of Belgrade publications

Category:University of Belgrade publications, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Guillaume2303 (talk) 12:38, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Use of nonfree images in templates

You recently created templates related to Belgrade University which incorporated the university's copyrighted logo. That image has been removed from the template, Please keep in mind that while the logo may be used in articles when the use meets the requirements of WP:NFCC, which is policy, that policy prohibits the use of nonfree images outside of articlespace, such as use in templates or userboxes. Thank you. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:29, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

tb

Hello, Comparativist1. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject University of Belgrade.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Antidiskriminator (talk) 08:33, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Simaavramovic.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Simaavramovic.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 10:36, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Simaavramovic.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Simaavramovic.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:48, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

University of Pristina

Hello! Given your interest on the universities of Serbia, I would invite you to a discussion on Talk:Univerzitet_u_Prištini and Talk:Universiteti i Prishtinës. I believe both are in bad shaped, bad named and incorrectly framed and written. I believe we might represent them better in wikipedia. --Rrallepermall (talk) 20:31, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An invitation to join the WikiProject Republika Srpska

WikiProject Republika Srpska
Project Icon Hi, Comparativist1, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the WikiProject Republika Srpska! WikiProject Republika Srpska is a WikiProject whose aim is to improve the quality and coverage of articles related to Republika Srpska and the Serbs of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It is chiefly designed to help users collaborate on articles, but also to resolve open questions and disputes, to establish project-wide conventions, and to coordinate work on vandalism clean-up. WikiProject Republika Srpska currently covers a total of 0 articles and 0 other related pages on the English Wikipedia.

We look forward to welcoming you to the project!

--Anulmanul (talk) 21:50, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BLRCover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BLRCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Simaavramovic.jpg

The file File:Simaavramovic.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]