User talk:Imprimaturcr

Welcome!

Howdy, Imprimaturcr, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions; you seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics! If you need help on how to title new articles, see the naming conventions, and for help on formatting pages, visit the manual of style. For general questions, go to Wikipedia:Help or the FAQ; if you can't find your answer there, check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions). There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. If you have any more questions after that, feel free to ask me directly on my user talk page.

Additional tips

Here are some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!

For Wikipedia policies and guidelines, see The Five Pillars of Wikipedia and What Wikipedia is not.
Find everything in the Directory.
If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills, the Sandbox is for you.
If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random article button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal.
If you have edits from before creating an account, see the page on changing attribution for edits.
You can also upload images. Make sure you use the correct copyright tags when you do.
Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.

Be bold

Be bold in updating pages! You can find instantaneous help any time simply by typing {{help}} anywhere on your own user or user talk page.
You can find me at my user page or talk page for any questions. Happy editing, and we'll see ya 'round.

 Joe  I 23:32, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Costa Rican colon symbol image

Hi, Daniel,

How about putting an image of the Costa Rican colón symbol in this table, which would look better than the little square. I've uploaded the image here but I don't know how to put it in the table. Do you? --DBlomgren 03:02, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

Much better! :) --DBlomgren 03:11, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Carajo

Why don't you stop worrying about money and go check this out? Put in your two colons' worth :). By the way, if you need any help with English, let me know. DBlomgren 05:11, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Numismatics

Greetings!! I'd like to welcome you to WikiProject Numismatics. Anything you see that can be improved upon, go for it, anything that is lacking add it, anything that is all together absent, please fill us in. There are quite a few knowledgeable people of both numismatics and wikipedia, in this little project, so don't hesitate to ask. Please be sure to read through the whole of the project pages, as we have just recently started using some of them. Again, welcome.

You can add this to your user page:

Which looks like so:

This user is a member of the Numismatics WikiProject, a WikiProject which aims to expand coverage of numismatics on Wikipedia. Please feel free to join.

Hope this gets you off and contributing to the little project that makes the world go round. If you need anything don't hesitate to ask either me, or Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numismatics. See ya :)Jo e I 22:11, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:5bcrlado1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:5bcrlado1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:55, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Abandoned Articles

Regarding your posting at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Abandoned Articles, I think the guidelines on how to work on a block of articles is pretty complete. You might want to just "claim" a block of ten articles and start working on those. As mentioned on the talk page of the project, the reality is that most of the "ancient" pages are disambiguation. Most of those do need work, and it's fairly easy work to fix these. So you might just want to learn more about disambiguation pages (do read the two information pages listed in the guidelines) and practice fixing a few.

Alternatively, or perhaps after you've done a block and want to work on "real" articles, not disambiguation pages, you could just go to Special:Ancientpages and jump ahead to number 301 or further, then start checking for "real" articles. When you find one that looks interesting, follow the detailed guidelines in the project in order to make the article less "abandoned". -- John Broughton (☎☎) 17:18, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WikiProject Catholicism!

Hello, Imprimaturcr, and welcome to Wikiproject Catholicism! Thank you for your generous offer to help contribute. I'm sure your input will be much appreciated. I hope you enjoy contributing here and being a Catholic Project Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to discuss anything on the project talk page, or to leave a message on my own talk page. Please remember to sign all your comments, and be bold with your edits. Again, welcome, and happy editing! Ghfj007 14:53, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

An update on Wikipedia:WikiProject Abandoned Articles

The project has reached the quarter-way point for the work on the list of the oldest 1000 ("abandoned") articles in Wikipedia: 250 articles have been reviewed and updated!

The project now has 21 members. If you're no longer interested, please take your name off the list; you won't get any further messages like this one. On the other hand, if you're still interested, please consider signing up for a(nother) block of 10 articles to work on - if everyone did this, we'd be almost halfway through those 1000 articles!

Finally, please note that project approach has changed slightly - there is now a section for editors to place articles that need to be "adopted", or to adopt articles that need further work. This means that if you find an article in a block of ten that needs more work than you have time for, it has a place to be put.

-- John Broughton (♫♫) 21:48, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I wonder if you might be interested in The Catholic Wiki Project? It's a fairly new Catholic POV wiki. Speculative catholic 02:25, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pipe syntax tutorial

May I suggest adding this to a subpage such as User:Daniel32708/Sandbox, or something. Less clutter on your talk page. Your more than welcome to make as many subpages of your user page as you need. :) Jo e I 04:31, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Saludos

Hola, soy un wikipedista de Cuba, coleccionista de billetes, cualquier ayuda o comentrio no dudes en contactarme
KatKiller 12:30, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Latin-American Wikipedia Meeting

"Latin-American Wikipedians,unite us!"

Hi wikipedian!Today I'm going to talk you about a new proposal that can to advantage you and many other users of Latin America.

You,that is from Latin America (or write about it),already shall to have observed the importance of the Wikimedia Frojects in the region.Only Wikipedia represent 40% of the internet access^[1].With every this importance,why don't we make a big meeting?

Of this idea,was borned the proposal for a Latin-American Wikipedian Meeting.Various Wikipedists has Latin-American users and this is a proposal of a culture and ideas interchange,that can be help all projects.Above this,comtemplate to help in the formation of new WMF chapters in Latin America.

The main page and the talk page is originally in English,with translations in Dutch,French,Portuguese and Spanish(NOT YET).

Tosão (talk) 19:21, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pope John Paul II

Hello Daniel, We are looking for help on the Pope John Paul II article in order to improve it and raise it to ‘Good Article’ and eventually ‘Featured Article’ status. So, I though I would invite you to take a look. Any help would be much appreciated. Kind Regards Marek.69 ^talk 02:52, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Romanesque architecture

Thank you for the beautiful picture Daniel. I enjoyed seeing it. But I had to take it out of that article, because it isn't Romanesque architecture. Romanesque is the style that came about after the fall of the Roman empire, when the principles that governed the style had been forgotten, but some of the structural principals were retained. A distinct style evolved over a period of time and can be seen right across Europe. There was then a Revival in the 19th century.

But your church is much too refined to be Romanesque Revival. It is Classical Revival and is based either on the style of Ancient Rome, or the revival of the classical style which began in the Renaissance with Brunelleschi and continued on, with Palladio, Michelangelo into the 17th century with Christopher Wren, Inigo Jones and so on. In England, the Classical style prevailed, but in Europe they went all out for Baroque (which is much fancier, with more curves and carvings) and it was Baroque architecture that was carried to South America for churches, while the Classical style was carried to North America. That lovely church of your has beautifully proportioned pilasters attached to the walls. It has Classical proportions. I can't see any Baroque details there, so I am going to presume that it is Classical in style, like a church built in England in the 17th or 18th century. Amandajm (talk) 15:07, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel, what I have tried to explain here is that there is a confusion between "Roman Style" The refined Classical style of Ancient Rome, and "Romanesque Style" the much less refined style that spread across Europe in the 10th- 12th centuries, and is strongly associated with large, organised Monastries like that at Cluny in France.

This building is not Romanesque. It is Classical. Now I have looked a more pictures I see that it is clearly an "Ancient Roman" style building. That is why it uses the word "Roman" rather than just saying "Classical". (A Classical Revival building might look like an Ancient Greek building and not like a Roman one.)

What I'm telling you is that your church is based on the buildings in the top line of the gallery. It is in the same style as the Classical Revival buildings in the middle line of the gallery. It has almost nothing to do with the Romanesque buildings in the bottom line of the gallery.

Amandajm (talk) 04:55, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ancient Roman Buildings: 1. Pont Flavien, France
2. Ostian Theatre, Rome
3. Roman city Gate
4. One of Rome's most ancient churches, Santa Balbina
Classical Revival (Roman style) churches in Germany: 1. St Ludwig Ansbach
2. Aufestehungskirche
3. Rinnthal Kirche
4. Sankt Blasien
Romanesque Churches in Germany: 1. S. Maria Lach
2. Bamberg Cathedral
3. Worms Cathedral
4. Mainz Cathedral

OK! I took an in depth look at the mouldings to which Johnbod referred. They are definitely more Romanesque than Roman in form. The architect seems to have used them consistently, right around the interior. I wonder why? They are a very odd choice. I withdraw my statement that the church has nothing to do with the German Romanesque buildings in Row 3. The positioning of the shaftes down the edges of truncated piers is also odd. What I would say is that there is a considerable amount of freedom in the design of the interior elements, which is not apparent in the exterior. It is a pity that so little remains. It is such a big building that it would have probably had a double row of peirs or columns to support the upper part of the building. Unfortunately these don't seem to be present.

The exterior (if I have rightly indentifed all the parts) is wholly Roman Classical Revival, with no sign of Romanesque. If your learned departments are basing their assessment on the magnificent facade and the other parts in the photos, and calling the "Romanesque" then they are entirely wrong. It is Roman, not Romanesque. If they are looking at the molding on the interior, then this detail is more Romanesque in form.

I would most definitely not refer to it as an example of Romanesque Revival, but of Roman Classical Revival. If you go to this page Regional characteristics of Romanesque architecture, and check out the 27 facades, and the numerous west doors, then check out the facade of this building and you will see why I am saying that it is not Romanesque. These paired pilasters are absolutely typical of a classical building. See St Pauls. The way in which the arch and its moulding sits on top of a capital-type moulding in every doorway is taken from buildings like the Colosseum.

Johnbod and I agree that it is Classical Revival, with some Romanesque details. We both know our stuff.

Amandajm (talk) 06:28, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Logo de la Universidad de Costa Rica

Saludos Daniel.

En representación de la Universidad de Costa Rica, particularmente de la Oficina de Divulgación e Información, le notifico que es incorrecto subir logos de nuestra Institución bajo la licencia Creative Commons, ya que esta no refleja el tipo de uso que es permitido para nuestros identificadores. En particular, el que ha subido "Firma_vertical.png" había sido ya removido en otra ocación debido al mismo problema; no podemos "resubirlo" bajo la licencia apropiada ya que no tenemos los permisos de usuario requeridos por Wikipedia para esta tarea.

Si lo desea puede cambiar la licencia a la apropiada "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Non-free_logo"; tenemos poca experiencia con los templates de Wikipedia, pero suponemos que la forma correcta para nuestro caso es:

Licensing

blanked

Orphaned non-free image File:2 colones banknote.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2 colones banknote.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:54, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:2 colones banknote back.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2 colones banknote back.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:54, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:10 colones banknote.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:10 colones banknote.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:02, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:10 colones banknote back.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:10 colones banknote back.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:02, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Old 2 colones banknote back.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Old 2 colones banknote back.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:04, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Old 2 colones banknote.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Old 2 colones banknote.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:05, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:100bccr.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:100bccr.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:05, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:100bccrback.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:100bccrback.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:05, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nacional costa rica.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nacional costa rica.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:50, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nacional costa rica b.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nacional costa rica b.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:30, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:1000lado1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:1000lado1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:57, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:1000lado2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:1000lado2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:57, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:10colonesbcrback.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:10colonesbcrback.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:59, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:10colonesbcrfront.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:10colonesbcrfront.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:59, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:1colonbncrback.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:1colonbncrback.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:07, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:1colonbncrfront.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:1colonbncrfront.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:07, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:2colonesfbccrback.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2colonesfbccrback.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:17, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:2colonesfbccrfront.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2colonesfbccrfront.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:18, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:5colonesbccrbackoscararias.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:5colonesbccrbackoscararias.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:22, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:5colonesbccrfrontoscararias.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:5colonesbccrfrontoscararias.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:22, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus: January 2012

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions and subscriptions contact the Newsroom

RFAR:Manning naming dispute - Formally added as party

The drafting arbitrators have requested that you be formally added as a party to the Manning naming dispute case. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manning naming dispute/Evidence. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manning naming dispute/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Seddon ^talk 18:34, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been named in a proposed ArbCom decision

Hi, Imprimaturcr. In the open Manning naming dispute case, a decision has been proposed which relates to you. The Arbitration Committee is voting on the proposals, and discussion is taking place on the talk page. If you have any comments or concerns, you should respond at the talk page. For the Arbitration Committee, Rs chen 7754 05:14, 9 October 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manning naming dispute closed

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

Hitmonchan (talk · contribs) is indefinitely topic-banned from all pages relating to any transgender topic or individual, broadly construed.
IFreedom1212 (talk · contribs) is indefinitely topic-banned from all pages relating to any transgender topic or individual, broadly construed.
Tarc (talk · contribs) is indefinitely topic-banned from all pages relating to any transgender topic or individual, broadly construed.
Josh Gorand (talk · contribs) is indefinitely topic-banned from all pages relating to any transgender topic or individual, broadly construed.
Baseball Bugs (talk · contribs) is indefinitely topic-banned from all pages relating to any transgender topic or individual, broadly construed. He is also topic banned from all pages (including biographies) related to leaks of classified information, broadly construed.
David Gerard (talk · contribs) is admonished for acting in a manner incompatible with the community's expectations of administrators (see #David Gerard's use of tools).
David Gerard (talk · contribs) is indefinitely prohibited from using his administrator permissions (i) on pages relating to transgender people or issues and (ii) in situations involving such pages. This restriction may be first appealed after six months have elapsed, and every six months thereafter.
The standard discretionary sanctions adopted in Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Sexology for (among other things) "all articles dealing with transgender issues" remain in force. For the avoidance of doubt, these discretionary sanctions apply to any dispute regarding the proper article title, pronoun usage, or other manner of referring to any individual known to be or self-identifying as transgender, including but not limited to Chelsea/Bradley Manning. Any sanctions imposed should be logged at the Sexology case, not this one.
All editors, especially those whose behavior was subject to a finding in this case, are reminded to maintain decorum and civility when engaged in discussions on Wikipedia, and to avoid commentary that demeans any other person, intentionally or not.

For the Arbitration Committee, Rs chen 7754 01:32, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Feast day listed at Redirects for discussion

I have asked for a discussion to address the redirect Feast day. You might want to participate in the redirect discussion.

You are receiving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Catholicism and/or WikiProject Saints --Jayarathina (talk) 12:46, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Latin American 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge ‎ has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Argentina etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Latin American content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon. If you would like to see this happening for Latin America, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Latin America, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant!♦ --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:36, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

WikiProject Numismatics newsletter

WikiProject Numismatics news and updates from the past month (March 2019)

Featured articles

Norfolk, Virginia, Bicentennial half dollar

Collaboration of the Month

The Numismatic Collaboration of the Month will be making a return in May. Feel free to make nominations.

Project news

As you can see, the project now has a newsletter. This first issue was sent to all members, but future issues will only be sent to users who subscribe.
A new task force focusing on American currency has been started.
A barnstar was created for the project last month, Enterlousy was the first to be awarded.

Member news

No new member news

Miscellaneous

On 22 Apr, 2019 the Lynchburg Sesquicentennial half dollar will be featured on the main page.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:09, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 US Banknote Contest

US Banknote Contest

November-December 2019

There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons.

In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate.

If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:29, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)[reply]

You have been pruned from a list

Hi Imprimaturcr! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 6 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:00, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

^ Comscore tracked 26 million out of 63 million (41% reach) viewed Wikipedia sites in Latin America (June 2008)

[1] Comscore tracked 26 million out of 63 million (41% reach) viewed Wikipedia sites in Latin America (June 2008)

[1]