- 1 Welcome
- 2 January 2016
- 3 Disambiguation link notification for January 16
- 4 Thanks for correction
- 5 ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
- 6 Any suggestion?
- 7 User:Stricnina-*face palm*
- 8 Kingdom of Tondo : the Wahhabi-Mainstreamist issue
- 9 Help me monitor those vandalisers in Battle of Marawi.
- 10 July 2017
- 11 A barnstar for you!
- 12 Tondo Discussion and Voting
- 13 Conflict of Interest
- 14 Hi! Just a safety note.
- 15 Request advice re: Template:History of the Philippines
- 16 ArbCom 2017 election voter message
- 17 Copyright problem on Igorot people
- 18 Disambiguation link notification for March 23
- 19 Disambiguation link notification for June 5
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Miss Universe. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 18:36, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Filipinos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria Park. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Thanks for correction
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Someone is deleting infobox without reviewing or checking the sources before they conducting a deletion in a particular section WP:VERIFIABILIY i warned him/her but he/she still keep reverting and editing the sections specially the infobox of the Kingdom of Tondo, so i need help to what should we do or where to go to resolve this issue thanks! (Theseeker2016 (talk) 13:03, 10 April 2017 (UTC))
This problematic edtitor once again reverted the work without reading or checking again the cited references not even consulting the board , he/she even putting maintenance tags which in the area with containing a legit citations / sources from the books and questioning the verifiability of LCI just like it was a unreliable or a Hoax this user also branded. Here i restored again the infobox. i hope you find a way again to restore the places and other parts on the previous version again thank you ! (Theseeker2016 (talk) 01:46, 13 April 2017 (UTC))
Kingdom of Tondo : the Wahhabi-Mainstreamist issue
Hello for the previous days i observing stricnina he/she is look like a puppet of some user which advocating the Ultra-Mainstreamism Sources are Valid Legit which i called Wahhabi Mainstreamist they tries eradicating the references under the pretext of "Scholarly beliefs" , she tagging a words in a sentence which is covered by a reference but actually a single column in one citations he/she just vandalizing the article using a tags and every refence which is tagged are legal sources, he/she tries to delete the references which is not on their views some of users here are planning to reduce the article fiasco from early 2010s which contains nothing.(05:49, 25 April 2017 (UTC))
Help me monitor those vandalisers in Battle of Marawi.
I appreciate your support and dedication for monitoring the article mentioned above. Please help us to improve that page! Hard work is really worth! Thank you. Mark_Jhomel 10:30, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Philippines. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. RivertorchFIREWATER 15:12, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|The Copyeditor's Barnstar|
|For your unceasing work in copyediting Philippines-related articles, for watching out for obvious vandalism, and for your ...erm... interesting brand of careful neutrality over potentially controversial edits. -- Alternativity (talk) 08:00, 20 July 2017 (UTC)|
Tondo Discussion and Voting
Heya. Would it be okay to ask you to move your vote from the "Further Discussion" to the "Survey" section? :D Just so the discussion and voting can be neater? :D Also, do you know the procedure for the article to be moved to a name other than the one proposed? - Alternativity (talk) 11:31, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
Conflict of Interest
Hi! Darwgon, You and i Have been summoned to SPI, because we for the reason just contributing good facts in Pre-colonial Philippine sections, and i been in there in SPI because i revert the edits of Gunkarta and N0n3tup, you guess what i smell that these two are having a conflict of interests on their edits , they excluded Philippines and i revert that because it contains academic works and based on scholarly books. but they remove it just because they suspected that was work of a blocked User it is irrelevant reasoning. As i read WP:Deletion policy and WP:Source there are no mentioned that the works of a blocked editor despite of reliability must be remove! and as i observed i hope you do , they misused SPI as their tool for blocking the editors opposed to their conflict of interest, as i think they using SPI as their "sword and sheild" , why this user with conflict of interest are allowed by admins to block anyone who improving philippine articles? i but i no mater what happends , im not afraid to confront them ! (Searcher0 (talk) 01:44, 28 August 2017 (UTC))
Hi! Just a safety note.
Heya. Friendly note. :D I notice you've received at least one attack on your talk page. Next time that happens (hopefully it doesn't), you may want to report it as quickly as possible at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents (the shortcut to which is WP:ANI. Such attacks should have no place in wikipedia, dagnabbit. Also, I notice your name is displayed on user page... that's perfectly acceptable of course, but as a concerned fellow-editor, I just wanted to warn you that it leaves you open to the potential of real-life harassment. (I unfortunately have my own experiences of this.) Hope you don't mind me saying these things. :D - Alternativity (talk) 04:35, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Request advice re: Template:History of the Philippines
Hi User:Darwgon0801. Now that the RM has been settled and we've been (rightly so!) encouraged to focus our efforts on improving the affected page(/s), I've recently been trying to update the various templates. For one thing, I'm not sure what to do with Template_talk:History of the Philippines. Since you seem to have more experience than me in editing templates, perhaps you have some thoughts? :D Thanks! - Alternativity (talk) 09:11, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Copyright problem on Igorot people
Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from here. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:03, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tourism in the Philippines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Negros (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)