User talk:Dilljam

Ways to improve Hyphessobrycon acaciae[edit]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Dilljam, thanks for creating Hyphessobrycon acaciae!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please move your references inline. This makes it far easier for readers to see if the information is verified and easier for other editors to work on.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 19:54, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Boleyn, I'll make sure to get on that ASAP. Dilljam (talk) 15:46, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Hyphessobrycon albolineatum) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Hyphessobrycon albolineatum, Dilljam!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I've done general cleanup: added a book source, category and taxonbar and linked to the species on other language versions of Wikipedia. Also put a tag on the talk page. Hope that's all OK.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Blythwood (talk) 19:18, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'm glad other Wikipedia contributors can help me out. Dilljam (talk) 05:29, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Pacific Eider has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pacific Eider. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 22:29, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pacific Eider (November 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please note that blogspot websites (or any of the sort, ie .wordpress, wix, etc) are (generally) not considered reliable sources and, as such, should be avoided. Please review the comment left previously on this draft by Theroadislong and read Help:Your first article. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me by clicking here or leaving a message at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pacific Eider and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheSandDoctor (talk) 04:00, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Dilljam, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheSandDoctor (talk) 04:00, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tetra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blue tetra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hyphessobrycon brumado - moved to Draft:Hyphessobrycon brumado[edit]

Hi Dilljam, Greetings. Pls note that your creation page Hyphessobrycon brumado has been moved to Draft:Hyphessobrycon brumado page. Content added/edited in Wikipedia needs inline citation from independent reliable source for verification to gauge nobility criteria is met. Pls see reliable source - WP:RS, verification - WP:V, and notability WP:N. For webcite - see here WP:CITEWEB and its template Template: cite web. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:49, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dilljam , see examples below:

To add an in-line text citation for an internet reference: <ref name="">{{cite web|url = |title = |accessdate = 15 April 2018|author=|last = |first = |work = |date = 15 April 2018|year=|archiveurl = |archivedate = }}</ref>
To add an in-line text citation for a paper reference <ref name="Green">Green, William: ''Observers Aircraft'', page 228. Frederick Warne Publishing, 1991. ISBN 0 7232 3697 6</ref>

(note: remove nowiki tag when input the citation) CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:34, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks to all who have informed me of editing pages incorrectly and helping me to improve on my “Wikipedia-ing” skills. Dilljam (talk) 03:01, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Moffitt's Canada goose concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Moffitt's Canada goose, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:40, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Inline citations needed[edit]

Hi Dilljam, Thank your for providing the source for Hyphessobrycon brumado. You have provided the source; however, what it needed was to provide inline citation (at the body text). I have fixed the inline citation for you and the article is in the main page now. Please go to the "history page on different" and see what I have done. Please provide (1) inline citations (instruction - click "cite" on the menu bar and fill in the fields - the the example on my previous email) and (2) add {{reflist}} < after "References" section. The below are the articles you need to work on.

Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:40, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Small cackling goose, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Culmen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moffitt's Canada goose has been accepted[edit]

Moffitt's Canada goose, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:18, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Atlantic Canada goose (October 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Atlantic Canada goose instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Atlantic Canada goose and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Atlantic Canada goose, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:56, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Atlantic Canada goose has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Atlantic Canada goose. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:02, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]