User talk:Don Kingake

Welcome!

Hello, Don Kingake, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Introduction to referencing
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Atlantic306 (talk) 23:37, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Atlantic I am working on making sure I am always in line with Wikipedia Verifiability Policy. Thanks for the tips also. i look forward to learning from you more on how I can become a wiki expert in time to come. Don Kingake (talk) 09:06, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kerkula Aketella Blama (January 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not a single independent, reliable, and secondary source, with the exception of ame.edu.lr – but that source doesn't mention Aketella. There is no actual claim to notability in the draft. Looks like there have been several attempts to create an article about him (e.g. at User:Kerkula Blama/sandbox and User:Aketella).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kerkula Aketella Blama and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 15:43, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Don Kingake! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 15:43, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 16:12, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Daintowon Domah Paye-Bayee. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. 217.33.116.183 (talk) 05:06, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Don Kingake. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Daintowon Domah Paye-Bayee, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 217.33.116.183 (talk) 22:05, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I am in no way connected to the person or entity of which I'm writing the page for. I've been following their works and decided to do a wikipedia page because they are a reputable person and/or entity in their country. Please reconsider these articles for publishing. Thankks Don Kingake (talk) 23:05, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you are not connected with her, how did you come to take the photo of her, File:Daintowon Domah Paye-Bayee.jpg? And how do you know all the personal information about her, such as her birth date, that she is a "God-Fearing person who was born unto the union of Mr. Alexander Gounquoi Domah and Madam Mary G. N. Vanmore Marbiah in Tappita, Nimba County; and raised by Caring and Loving Mr. Y. Mewaseh Pay-Bayee and Mrs. Theresa L. G. Pay-Bayee", etc? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.33.116.183 (talk) 05:04, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kerkula Blama moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kerkula Blama. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability, it has too many problems of language or grammar and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Misterrrrr (talk) 13:44, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Daintowon Domah Paye-Bayee moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Daintowon Domah Paye-Bayee, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:54, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tea With Ake moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tea With Ake, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 16:10, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Tea With Ake has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tea With Ake. Thanks! SamHolt6 (talk) 16:26, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kerkula Blama (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drmies was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Promotional writing with spam links.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kerkula Blama and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drmies (talk) 17:03, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

Drmies (talk) 17:07, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article moved to Draftspace

An article you recently created has been moved to draft at Draft:Boifatty. The article subject may fail WP:NMUSIC, and the draft is slightly promotion. Recommend you submit the article to WP:AFC. Best. SamHolt6 (talk) 18:27, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Don Kingake (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi Wiki, I've read and understood the reason for which I was blocked and I'm writing to state that this will never happen again. And I therefore declare that I will do all my best to make productive contributions to Wikipedia. Also, my contributions to Wikipedia were not done intentional to damage and/or cause disruption to Wikipedia. And my account is in no way connected with the reason it was blocked. That is because, I have not received any payment or has no intention of receiving payment to publish articles for people on Wikipedia. Reason I'm doing those articles is to help give more of an authentic Internet Presence to deserving personalities in my country. Many of them have the audience and visibility but their internet presence is poor which might make it difficult to drive brands and investors their way if a search is done on the internet. Again, the articles I published are not paid articles and i Have no intention of collecting payment for publishing them. Please consider my unblock request as I promise to do all my best to be a more productive contributorDon Kingake (talk) 09:52, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This request doesn't help you, as you admit that you are here for promotional purposes. It's difficult to believe that you are just doing this out of the goodness of your heart to help out fellow countrymen. You also did not answer the question above- if you are "in no way connected" to Daintowon Domah Paye-Bayee how did you come to take an image of her, that she clearly posed for?. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 10:04, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Don Kingake (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi Wiki, I've read and understood the reason for which I was blocked and I'm writing to state that this will never happen again. And I therefore declare that I will do all my best to make productive contributions to Wikipedia. Also, my contributions to Wikipedia were not done intentional to damage and/or cause disruption to Wikipedia. And my account is in no way connected with the reason it was blocked. That is because, I have now been able to receive payment for articles or pages I open for people on Wikipedia. Though the payments are little compensations for my services but another main reason I'm doing those articles is to help give more of an authentic Internet Presence to deserving personalities in my country. Many of them have the audience and visibility but their internet presence is poor which might make it difficult to drive brands and investors their way if a search is done on the internet. It is true that most of the old articles I published were paid for but some of them weren't articles I collected payment. Also about the connection to Daintowon Domah-Payebayee she is a top government personality in my country with a facebook page where I took most of the contents I used for creating her page. I don't know her in person or have any close connection to her. Please consider my unblock request as I promise to do all my best to be a more productive contributor

Decline reason:

This makes matters much worse, not better. Violating WP:COPYRIGHT by falsely claiming ownership of that image places the entire project in jeopardy. Additionally, you still haven't disclosed the full and complete nature of your conflict of interest. We aren't remotely interested in you giving people "more of an authentic Internet Presence" here. That's not what Wikipedia is for, nor would paid editing result in anything authentic. No thanks, please take your promotional activities somewhere where they would be appropriate. Yamla (talk) 10:59, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daintowon Domah Paye-Bayee (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The only source in the education section makes no mention of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daintowon Domah Paye-Bayee and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 20:28, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don Kingake, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by Geez Media on behalf of Boifatty for their contributions to Wikipedia.

.

Concern regarding Draft:Kerkula Aketella Blama

Hello, Don Kingake. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kerkula Aketella Blama, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.