User talk:Ekbal anuj

Dr. Vivek Kumar Pandey

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dr. Vivek Kumar Pandey, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Dr. Vivek Kumar Pandey. Iain99^{Balderdash and piffle} 23:45, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Dr. Vivek Kumar Pandey

An editor has nominated Dr. Vivek Kumar Pandey, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Vivek Kumar Pandey and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:14, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome

Hi Ekbal anuj! welcome to Wikipedia!

Be bold in editing pages and don't let others scare you off! To sign your posts (for eg. on talk pages) use ~~~~ (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp.

Here are some links that you might find useful:   Wikipedia:How to edit a page   Tutorial   Sandbox, the place where you can experiment   Wikipedia:Where to ask a question.   Wikipedia:Five pillars   Wikipedia:Manual of Style

You can contribute in many ways   write an article   fight vandalism   Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome   Improve illustrations and upload new images   perform maintenance tasks   Become member of a project that interests you

I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. If you need help, you can drop a note on my talk page or use Wikipedia:New contributors' help page. You can also type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia! utcursch | talk 09:06, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

utcursch | talk 09:06, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

The Creator of Page Dr. Pandey is not against but some enemy's of Dr. Pandey who done his huge loss in life due to handling a great job in a centre which was against the permision of huge group of Scientific people of India and abroad related with Indian People and regional political parties people like Congress, SP, RJD, and others whose influnce was near BHU, Varanasi and University of Allahab, Allahaba students may be given you this comment. But Truth have it's own effect he is multidimensional people so they will be defeated one day although he know they can not accept it on outer face. This IP address may be use by others so all entries which is really use full and acceptable please consider other wise if one is thinking wikipedia is log of Brahma (GOD) then he is foolish enough who using this IP adress adding and deleting unnecessary comments and asking questionaing. Son light is his internal not from outer fuel but common peolpe use Wikipedia should know about Milk and water property. Other wise one will creat the things other will throw stone on it.

AfD nomination of Indian Institute of tropical Meteorology

I have nominated Indian Institute of tropical Meteorology, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian Institute of tropical Meteorology. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. RT | Talk 11:29, 26 January 2008 (UTC) You can remove the entry is is well renound in India

Speedy deletion of INCOIS

A tag has been placed on INCOIS requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sting au Buzz Me... 12:00, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

 You can do what is lawfull

Speedy deletion of NCMRWF

A tag has been placed on NCMRWF requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sting au Buzz Me... 12:07, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

The article asserts significance, and I have therefore removed the speedy template. -- Hoary (talk) 12:42, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Indian Academy of Science Bangalore

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Indian Academy of Science Bangalore, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.ias.ac.in. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:29, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Yes, it was plagiarized, and I therefore deleted it. -- Hoary (talk) 12:43, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Dr. Vivek Kumar Pandey

The article Dr. Vivek Kumar Pandey starts with a conspicuous and clear warning that its deletion has been proposed. You have also been warned of this in an earlier message, visible above. Of course, you are free to ignore the warning and the message, but I'm puzzled by your continuing interest in editing the article. As you can see in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Vivek Kumar Pandey‎, it is heading for deletion. Nobody has yet spoken up coherently in its defense. You are welcome to do so, of course within [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Vivek Kumar Pandey‎]. I suggest that you take the trouble to defend it. -- Hoary (talk) 12:51, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

The IP address is in use of common people and generally used by others in absence and can be used by more technical person so the default addition and coment should avoid and neglected. But you should not that truth will win at last if it is not written by me I am not 24 hours worker on this IP address.

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Dr. vivek Kumar Pandey for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Toddst1 (talk) 17:02, 29 January 2008 (UTC) The IP address is in use of common people and generally used by others in absence and can be used by more technical person so the default addition and coment should avoid and neglected.

January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Category:Azamgarh, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 21:24, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Indian meteorological Society

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Indian meteorological Society, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://education.vsnl.com/imschennai/ims01.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:46, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

The reference for Fellow of India Meteorological Society, Dr. Pandey has given in text. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ekbal anuj (talk • contribs)

Editing Style

Please review Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia especially Wikipedia:External_links#How_to_link. Frankly, you're making a mess out of many articles that you are editing. User: Hoary has spent a fair amount of time cleaning them and I have as well, but I think you could make your edits much more constructive. Toddst1 (talk) 06:23, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Your Idea is good but, the experience editing needed much time but I use to do such things in vacant time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ekbal anuj (talk • contribs)

Speedy deletion of Indian meteorological Society

A tag has been placed on Indian meteorological Society requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Toddst1 (talk) 06:25, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Indian meteorological Society. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Toddst1 (talk) 06:26, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Dr. Pandey is in Governing Council of IITM for a long time therefore the link may be removed and its name is suffiecint for meteorology people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ekbal anuj (talk • contribs)

VK Pandey

I suggest that you wait at least two years before you attempt to add an article about Vivek Kumar Pandey. Reposting a stub as soon as the AfD closed will serve no purpose except to annoy people. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 07:41, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Yes your idea may be better as for common people it is hard to tolerate the Young person in India and world, how ever he loss his real life or time for any fiexed purpose or not any way God is Kind enough with him that no can remove from this world if from wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ekbal anuj (talk • contribs)

Speedy deletion of Vigyan Gaurav Samman

A tag has been placed on Vigyan Gaurav Samman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gromlakh (talk) 07:50, 30 January 2008 (UTC) Vigyan Gaurav Samman is related with CST UP Govt. India

but Dr. P. C. Pandey is in list of Vigyan Ratna Samman wich is after created some time in wikipedia

Speedy deletion of Indian Academy of Science Bangalore

A tag has been placed on Indian Academy of Science Bangalore requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Toddst1 (talk) 03:08, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

If it violated criterion then you can remove you it it concerned with people of well renound Institute of India so link is not too much necessary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ekbal anuj (talk • contribs)

February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did to Kaali Jee, makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —EncMstr 07:13, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

You can change it as by giving heading

Shoveling in links

In this edit of yours, you added a pile of links. Let's just take one of these:

[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/2006-12-31 - 162k -]]

What is your point in adding this? -- Hoary (talk) 13:52, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

It may be mistake by chance, it can be removed ... added by Ekbal Anuj in this edit

And in your edit summary you elaborate on this: mistake by chance as time is not sufficient to generally care seriously for long. If time is not sufficient to care about what you're adding, please don't add it. Adding lots of stuff without seriously caring about it merely creates more work for other people, and it tends to irritate them. -- Hoary (talk) 15:11, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Prem Chand Pandey

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Prem Chand Pandey, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Prem C. Pandey. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:12, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Prem C. Pandey, you will be blocked from editing. Toddst1 (talk) 18:49, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

That seems a bit harsh: Ekbal anuj is one of a small number of editors being criticized (by me) for adding junk, and then again criticized (by Toddst1) -- actually, threatened with a block -- for removing it.

Ekbal anuj, I suggest that you should remove junk from the article, retain what's valuable and well sourced, and improve what you retain. (Also see below.) -- Hoary (talk) 02:18, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Toddst1 alerted me to this message of yours, which seems to be addressed to me.

I don't understand your message, but you seem to be unhappy about the proposed deletion of the article Prem C. Pandey. If you are indeed unhappy about this, you should (i) improve the article, and (ii) argue persuasively in its "AfD" for its retention. -- Hoary (talk) 02:18, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Dr. vivek Kumar Pandey

I have concluded that you have used another account previously. Although this is normally not allowed per the policy against using two accounts, it is not a problem because you stopped using your old account. Please do the following:

1. Please use only this account from now on.
2. Please respect the conflict of interest guidelines. Do not write articles about yourself or your friends.

If you have questions about this, please ask on my talk page (click "hello"). Shalom (Hello • Peace) 02:03, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Template:Notable Wikipedian/doc and Wikipedia:WikiProject Numismatics/Style

I've removed the biography of Prem C. Pandey that you added to the template and another editor has removed it from the Numismatics project page. I'd like to think that these edits were made in good faith, but either way you are continuing to disrupt Wikipedia with unconstructive edits. Please take the time to learn our policies and guidelines or stop editing. A good place to start learning would be Help:Contents/Policies and guidelines Toddst1 (talk) 16:44, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

K.R. Ramnathan Memorial Medal

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article K.R. Ramnathan Memorial Medal, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of K.R. Ramnathan Memorial Medal. Toddst1 (talk) 19:04, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Block

I have blocked you briefly for "indiscipline". This edit was pure vandalism. You have now been contibuting long enough to know the difference between a template and article. You had not bothered to contribute to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prem C. Pandey but within hours of the article being deleted, you simply recreated it at Prem Chand Pandey.

Did you actually read any of the comments in the AfD and edit summaries? The deletionists were objecting as much to the style of the article as to the guy's notability. The fact for example, that it contained a hundred more external links than it needed. You simply re-created the same CV / link farm article.

Incidentally, to create an indented comment, use a leading colon (":"). A leading space results in page widening. Also, on talk pages, always sign your comments with ~~~~. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 18:02, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kaali Jee

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kaali Jee, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fabrictramp | talk to me 16:53, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of K. Banerjee Center of Atmospheric and Ocean Studies

An article that you have been involved in editing, K. Banerjee Center of Atmospheric and Ocean Studies, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K. Banerjee Center of Atmospheric and Ocean Studies. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Iain99^{Balderdash and piffle} 21:12, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vigyan Gaurav Award

The article Vigyan Gaurav Award has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 19:04, 30 December 2013 (UTC)