Jump to content

User talk:Eternal Shadow/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi RedRiver660! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 01:03, Monday, June 8, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Citation for my edit

Hello RedRiver660,

I saw you took down my update to the 'Hononegah Community High School' wikipedia page because I did not have a trustworthy citation. I have found a trustworthy citation for my update however:

Wifr. “Hononegah Wins Regional on Hart Buzzer-Beater.” Content, 6 Mar. 2020, www.wifr.com/content/sports/Hononegah-wins-regional-on-Hart-buzzer-beater-5685852612.html.

I was wondering if you could please add my update back to the site.

Thank you,

Blake

@Blake Goldman: You can find the edit in the page history and add the citation manually. The fastest way is to use the template cite web.

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi RedRiver660! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 01:21, Monday, June 8, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:47, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:53, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Enrique Martinez Celaya‎

I believe it may be time for a semi-protect? Does that apply here? GauchoDude (talk) 18:51, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

GauchoDude, I concur. Eternal Shadow Talk 19:07, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
I've never done that, can you handle? Or should I look in to how to do it? GauchoDude (talk) 19:24, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

GauchoDude, I can handle it. In future occasions make a request at WP:RPP. Eternal Shadow Talk 22:12, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Rejection at AfC

At the time you rejected the Ruch Polska 2050 article, it looked like this[1]. OK, one independent source isn't ideal, but it's not great to reject an article on an obviously notable topic when you could have done a google search and very quickly found more sources (even in English). This isn't going to encourage more people to contribute articles. (t · c) buidhe 05:11, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Buidhe, My apologies. I likely did it during a flurry of poor rejections in late July. See here Eternal Shadow Talk 21:13, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXIV, October 2020

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:21, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Help with Philippe Fabry draft

Hi Eternal Shadow, I'm new to creating Wikipedia submissions and am unsure as to why my submission was declined. This is a translation of its French equivalent and I have kept true to the original source text (which was approved - https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippe_Fabry). Can you please provide me with some more direction on how I might be able to fix this? If I change it I will be straying from the original source text. Thank you.Alexandra Thomson (talk) 00:05, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

(TPW) Alexandra Thomson, I'm not sure what the policies on frwiki are, but the main problem the article had was that it read more like a narrative story and not like an encyclopedia entry. It was on a motorcycle that Philippe Fabry undertook his first travels in the 1970s and Philippe Fabry then changed continent and arrived in Asia in 1981, are not consistent with Wikipedia's encyclopedic style. Username6892 (Review my work!) 01:01, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. I have just reworked it and will continue doing so to adhere to Wikipedias neutral POV. Please feel free to provide me with additional advice on my revised version to let me know if it is suitable or not. Alexandra Thomson (talk) 01:47, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Sam Colangelo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sam Colangelo, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Colangelo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Nreal - re: Not sufficiently Notable

I just reviewed the feedback and wanted to see if I could get a clarification on the reason for the article's rejection. Those familiar with the AR/MR industry, Nreal is considered to be on par with Magic Leap and Hololens. They're also the only one to have launched consumer mixed reality glasses on the market in partnerships with 5G carriers - particularly following Magic Leap's pivot. The founder is also from Magic Leap. But on the mention regarding the criteria of notability Magic Leap had gone out of its way to sue the company, which resulted in independent, albeit unfavorable coverage about Nreal. So wanted to get a better understanding of the reasons behind the decision on notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Francis Bea (talk • contribs) 04:57, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi Eternal Shadow, wanted to loop back around to try to get some feedback on the rejection of this article. Would love to hear your thoughts on this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Francis Bea (talk • contribs) 06:50, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Shawn Occeus for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shawn Occeus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shawn Occeus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pichpich (talk) 20:44, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 November 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:50, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Help with Draft Approval

Hi Eternal Shadow. At your direction in a discussion on the Help page for Afc, I started a multi-editor discussion about approving the draft: Shift4 Payments for the main space: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft_talk:Shift4_Payments. The multi-editor discussion has now concluded and everyone agreed the article is now notable, but someone with Afc privileges needs to go back in and approve the article. Would you mind taking a look and approving it? Thank you very much. Paul.jonah.paul (talk) 19:11, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Approval of Translation of existing Wikipedia Page

Hello Eternal Shadow,

I am new on Wikipedia (at least in editing and commenting) and I am turning to you because it seems you are entitled to give your okay to the publishing of this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Stieglbrauerei_zu_Salzburg [en.wikipedia.org]

On July 31, you denied publishing of this entry. Wikipedia says in its dialogue that it would not be supported by "trustworthy sources". Thing is that this entry is just the translation of this existing published wikipedia page: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stieglbrauerei_zu_Salzburg [de.wikipedia.org] - it is just the original in german language.

Stiegl, a widely popular brewery in Austria, is the author of both pages which deal with their company itself. So they are fully authorized to write about themselves and the most direct source to do so. Here is their website, english version: https://www.stiegl.at/en

I am working for Stiegl's media agency and kindly ask you to accept their entry https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Stieglbrauerei_zu_Salzburg [en.wikipedia.org]

Kind regards, Roman — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roman Vienna (talk • contribs) 12:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Unione Giovani Ebrei d'Italia

Hi, I saw you reviewed the page I created. It is the third time the page gets reviewed, since the first review I added a significant amount of new information, including several third party neutral references. It is a very important organization in the Italian Jewish scene and the info I provided are pretty complete, covering all the sectors in which this association works. The previous reviews never mentioned any kind of "promotional wording", which I frankly do not see, therefore I kindly ask you to finally accept this draft.

Good evening, DavidGibbone22 (talk) 00:14, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Help needed for fixing the page Draft:Nreal

Hi Eternal, the page Draft:Nreal (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Nreal) was declined as a result of insufficient notability, I hope you could provide further information on what contents are needed and also how we can fix the issue. Nreal is currently pioneering in launching consumer-facing Augmented Reality glasses, which just landed in Japan and South Korea and has been reporting on various news worldwide. Hope to get some advices from you on how to make it published with the right information needed. Thank you. Avishung (talk) 06:04, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXV, November 2020

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:51, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Re-review?

Can you perhaps take another look at Draft:Simon Singer? I believe I addressed your concern. --2604:2000:E010:1100:CC8C:FAF8:39F2:D6ED (talk) 19:40, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:45, 29 November 2020 (UTC)


thanks Eternal Shadow for reviewed Draft:Rt Rana Rajuiu (talk) 07:57, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject Newcomer and Historian of the Year awards now open

G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

New Page Patrol December Newsletter

Hello Eternal Shadow,

A chart of the 2020 New Page Patrol Queue

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank Username Num reviews Log
1 DannyS712 bot III (talk) 67,552 Patrol Page Curation
2 Rosguill (talk) 63,821 Patrol Page Curation
3 John B123 (talk) 21,697 Patrol Page Curation
4 Onel5969 (talk) 19,879 Patrol Page Curation
5 JTtheOG (talk) 12,901 Patrol Page Curation
6 Mcampany (talk) 9,103 Patrol Page Curation
7 DragonflySixtyseven (talk) 6,401 Patrol Page Curation
8 Mccapra (talk) 4,918 Patrol Page Curation
9 Hughesdarren (talk) 4,520 Patrol Page Curation
10 Utopes (talk) 3,958 Patrol Page Curation
Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVI, December 2020

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:49, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 December 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:25, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Voting for "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" closing

G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team

TBwoy (tanonga nswana)

Hello, Eternal Shadow, I believe you are well. Thank you for our feedback concerning the subject Tbwoy and the reason for decline for approval. I have reviewed your reasons for the said decision. I have also checked the "generally unreliable", "deprecated" or "blacklisted" categories and the references I used fall under the reliable independent sources. please advise and guide me on the way forward. thank you once again. looking forward to your response.Mukadaliso (talk) 10:31, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVII, January 2021

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:06, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:10, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

The Page I Created

Hi Eternal Shadow, I saw you reviewed the page I created. It is the second time the page gets reviewed. After the first review I added a great number of new reliable outside neutral sources. The professor is very highly revered in the Druze community and the information I provided is all backed up by proper outside references. It seems that since the references are mainly in languages you are not necessarily familiar with, you tended to believe that they are not outside reliable sources. The previous reviewer only asked to add more references and so I did. I would appreciate it if you accept this draft since it is important for the Druze community to acknowledge their highly revered scholars and pioneering women. Thank you for your time. Here's the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Eve_Afifa_Kheir — Preceding unsigned comment added by MaxineMalone (talk • contribs) 08:43, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

DRAFT MARCO CASTELLI

Hello Eternal Shadow, can you please help me out with my draft? I really appreciate your support and help.

Best regards Roberto — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roberto volpo (talk • contribs) 18:13, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

ANI-notice

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ashleyyoursmile! 07:11, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, February 2021

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:59, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, February 2021

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:03, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:28, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXIX, March 2021

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:56, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Draft:PCUSA

Hi there. There is a draft (Party of Communists USA) that you once declined for official publication while ago. So I saw there were some problems with it and I attempted to edit some of its content. That is why I decided to contact with you and ask you if you're aware of these slight changes and whether they're enough to be considered ok for publishing. I'm also willing to know what more can be done for submission to be accepted. I'm waiting for your response.Sfoklus (talk) 16:17, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Making Submission Acceptable

Hello Eternal Shadow.

You recently denied submission of: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Exploring_Wine_Regions

Editor's summary: Declining submission: nn - Submission is about a topic not yet shown to meet general notability guidelines (be more specific if possible) (AFCH 0.9.1)

Based on Wikipedia:Notability (books), this article meets these notability guidelines for both numbers 1 and 2 of the guidelines. On #1, the books have been the subject of 43 non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself. On #2, the books have won five major literary awards.

Based on meeting, and exceeding, the notability standards, I am confused by your declining submission?

You further stated to be more specific if possible. What specifics are you looking for to make this submission acceptable?

Pilotmichael (talk) 01:05, 1 February 2021 (UTC)


Hello Again Eternal Shadow, I wrote you a week ago and have not heard back. I wrote you (then and now) during the times you said would get a timely response. Michael Pilotmichael (talk) 00:08, 10 February 2021 (UTC)


Eternal Shadow, It has been three weeks now, and no response? Would you please converse so we can get this resolved. Michael Pilotmichael (talk) 15:58, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Eternal Shadow, It has now been almost two months and no response from you. Why? You say "If you have any queries, you may ask me at my talk page." Well, I am here with queries. Please respond. Michael Pilotmichael (talk) 17:43, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 March 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:43, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:24, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXX, April 2021

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 02:09, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Reailable Source

Just need help to define what is the criteria of a reliable source. As my contribution has been denied with the justification of reliable source. I have tried my best to gather all information possible in the English Language when the subject has many articles in the Nepali language as well. But in the English Language, it is very difficult to locate. So I think it is unfair to label unreliable sources when the existing source is the credible source in Nepal. Please help with how to define it. The subject is a highly respected businessman of Nepal with a great contribution to developing industrial and financial services in Nepal. In fact, his family members introduced Coca Cola in Nepal, Carlsberg in Nepal (even in India as his brother CP Khetan is 33% shareholder of Carlsberg India), introduced banking in Nepal as they are promotor of Nepal Bank (first private sector bank of Nepal), Himalayan Bank and Laxmi Bank. Thus just want to get your suggestion on how to proceed. Thank you for your intervention and looking forward receiving your support.

@Manishthapa1981:Reliable Sources are sources that are neutral and verifyable. WP:RSP may help. A major problem is that some of the sources used are promotional and unreliable. At times the article is written like a resume, which violates WP:NPOV. After rereading the article it appears he is notable but the sourcing needs improvement. Eternal Shadow Talk 22:52, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Enlabs AB draft declined

Hello Eternal Shadow,

First of all, thank you for reviewing Draft:Enlabs_AB.

I was just curious if you took into consideration that the company is publicly traded? I know that doesn't make the company automatically notable according to WP:LISTED, but just wondered if it has been taken into account?
A quote from WP:LISTED "There has been considerable discussion over time whether publicly traded corporations, or at least publicly traded corporations listed on major stock exchanges such as the NYSE and other comparable international stock exchanges, are inherently notable"
According to Wikipedia's list of major stock exchanges, Nasdaq Nordic ranks 15th on the list. So I guess it is a major stock exchange?

Taking that into consideration, and on top of that there are references that are independent as far as I understand, for example reference 1 (Stockopedia), reference 2 (Yahoo News) and reference 9 (Reuters). I guess references about acquisitions and sponsorship agreements are more promotional indeed but I can clean those up.

Would really appreciate to get some feedback on this. Thanks Randomhero77 (talk) 14:28, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Help to make the article neutral on Draft:Elijah Chinezim Onyeagba

Thank you for your review and recommendation. As a new user I am trying as much as I can to use this draft to learn how to publish on Wikipedia and your recommendation for neutrality is in need of the help of expert editors like yourself in helping me meet Wikipedia standard. Kindly recommend necessary phrases or paragraph that are lacking in neutrality. Thank you for your very important time and attention. Bibihans (talk) 08:31, 11 May 2021 (UTC)Bibihans

Made changes on neutrality

Thanks for your comment on my Draft:Elijah Chinezim Onyeagba for the neutrality. I have made necessary adjustments in line with Wikipedia standard. Kindly review at your most convenient time out of your tight schedule. Thanks. Bibihans (talk) 12:08, 12 May 2021 (UTC)Bibihans

The Bugle: Issue CLXXXI, May 2021

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:57, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Ask for a Re-review Draft:Kimia_Sharbafian

Hello Eternal Shadow.

You recently denied submission of: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Kimia_Sharbafian

Editor's summary: Declining submission: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

This article is a biography of musician Kimia Sharbafian and her performance history in Iran as an oboe Player.

What specifics are you looking for to make this submission acceptable? I fixed the citation for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Kimia_Sharbafian And eager to get re-review Sincerely yours Pedar Padesha — Preceding unsigned comment added by PedarPadesha (talk • contribs) 10:11, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Sandeep_Kumar_Mishra

Thanks for your comment on my https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Sandeep_Kumar_Mishra for the neutrality. I have added so many reliable third party references and photos. I have made necessary adjustments in line with Wikipedia standard. Kindly review at your most convenient time out of your tight schedule. Thanks Workhardalltime (talk) 05:24, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

1979 Portland State Vikings football team

Hello, I don't understand why you declined my submission for AFC at Draft:1979 Portland State Vikings football team. If you compare it to other single-season Portland State articles, all but the 2020 season (4 refs) have less references than my submission. Also, in Category:Stub-Class college football articles, there are thousands of short season articles that have 0-3 references. And while WP:NSEASONS says it should consist of "well-sourced prose", there are at least 7,500 college football season articles that fail this with 1-7 sentences, a schedule, and possibly some players for the team. Is the reason you declined it because of not enough references, or because it's a stub? Thanks. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:58, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Question about declined post

Hi, You declined my submission (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jeff_Burger) but I'm not sure I understand why. The comment says it is not written in a "formal tone" and should avoid "peacock terms." Can you please give me examples of sentences that need to be revised or deleted? The only lines I see that could be seen as "promoting the subject" are in quoted material from independent published sources but I could delete those if that's the problem. Many thanks for any guidance you can provide.

The Bugle: Issue CLXXXII, June 2021

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:06, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 June 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:14, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Tagging CSD G13 stale drafts

Hello, Eternal Shadow,

Thanks for your help with speedy deletion tagging. There is one thing to keep in mind though if you want to tag stale drafts for CSD G13. They are eligible for deletion 6 months after the last human edit to the page and we are pretty strict about not tagging and deleting them too early, just as a way to keep everyone following the same rules. But Wikipedia runs on UTC time, not U.S. time. I believe you are on the U.S. West Coast and you have probably set up your Preferences to show the local time. If you are looking at the edit history of an article from December 27, 2020, it would be eligible at 2 pm Pacific Time (June) if the last edit was at 1 pm Pacific Time (December) or earlier. That's because we are in Daylight Savings Time now and in December 2020 we were in Standard Time. So, there is a one hour time difference between the time now and the time six months ago in the edit history. And this whole thing gets reversed when we change time again in the fall and there is an hour difference in the other direction. There isn't much of the year where the time period of six months ago is the same as the time period in the present.

I've found it helpful to have a UTC clock in the upper right hand side of my screen (I'm on a laptop) but I don't remember how I set this up...they could probably tell you at the Teahouse. And I go by SDZeroBot's G13's lists which shows the expiring time of drafts in UTC time so it's easier to avoid mistakes.

And, just to let you know, this is a mistake most U.S. editors make when looking at drafts from months and months ago. When one is in the U.S., it's sometimes hard to remember that Wikipedia time is different from our own local time. Thank you and let me know if you have any questions. Liz Read! Talk! 21:30, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

P.S. One way to tell if you've tagged a G13 draft too early is that the deletion tag is pink. Somehow, the system knows! Liz Read! Talk! 21:40, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
Thanks. Makes sense how the time change works. I’ll make sure to try the new method when doing G13 drafts in the future. Eternal Shadow Talk 00:44, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Regarding Draft:NADDPOD, as I said, if you are in the U.S. where there is Daylight Savings time, add an hour to the last human edit and that's when the draft can be deleted. So, if you are on the U.S. West Coast, and the last human edit on the draft says it happened at 5 pm, December 29, 2020, you can tag it at 6 pm, June 29, 2021. This will be the situation until fall 2021. Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 01:03, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
How early did I tag it? Was I a few minutes too early (as it appears on my end) or did I tag way too early? I feel like I am improving my timing but still tag early at times. Eternal Shadow Talk 02:21, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Draft:ANSONBEAN appears as exactly 6 months on my end; tagged it and I wonder how it appears on your end. Eternal Shadow Talk 02:23, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Request on 07:25:11, 5 July 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Excellenc1


My article is a translation of the Spanish article by the same name (The Good Burger) and the citations I have used are mostly from that article. So is that the article is notable in Spanish but not in English (because the policies differ) or maybe you would like to compare both and approve my draft? Thank you! Excellenc1 (talk) 07:25, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Excellenc1, I don’t think the Spanish article has much to do with the English one, but the references don’t indicate meeting the notability guideline on corporations. Perhaps more secondary coverage may lead to the submission eventually being accepted. Eternal Shadow Talk 21:12, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello Eternal Shadow:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.

Re: Articles for creation: Teddy Goitom

Dear User Eternal Shadow,

Thank you very much for looking at the draft Teddy Goitom I've created and giving me useful feedback on how to improve it. I am very grateful that you noticed that there have been some tone improvements and pointed me in the right direction on how to further improve it. I have re-edited the article to my best knowledge and re-submitted it.

Thank you and kind regards,

YNovakovic (talk) 12:33, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

YNovakovic, the tone seems much better although I will let someone else re-review your submission. Eternal Shadow Talk 20:58, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

about my article

Dear User Eternal Shadow, this article is about a famous Ukrainian model who has been working in the USA for a long time. I'm not a vandalist, I write about public, famous people.

User:T.Yusherova (talk) 18:26, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

User:T.Yusherova, the subject appears to fail WP:NPERSON with the current references. Most of the sources are not independent and reliable. Please add more sources, and the chances of your submission being accepted will go up. The tone is not a huge issue, though it leans toward WP:Peacock terms at times. Eternal Shadow Talk 20:53, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Amrun Mubarok for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amrun Mubarok is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amrun Mubarok until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:51, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Aled ap Steffan

Hi,

Thank you for taking time to check through this article. I am a little confused to why it cant be approved? Other articles on Wikipedia have way less references than the British Actor 'Aled ap Steffan' and yet his article isn't approved. Can you please explain why. Very best wishes, Patrick

Proposed deletion of Revista de Derecho de la Universidad Nacional del Altiplano de Puno

Notice

The article Revista de Derecho de la Universidad Nacional del Altiplano de Puno has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 08:22, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Eternal_Shadow/Archive_2&oldid=1068932636"