Jump to content

User talk:FabulousFerd

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, FabulousFerd! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 12:35, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Welcome

[edit]

Quick a lot of edits under your belt already. But please be aware of WP:NPOV and WP:DUE. EvergreenFir (talk) 03:32, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/You're fired!

[edit]

It would be nice when you voice your objections without personal attacks, as you did on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/You're fired!. The Banner talk 10:05, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@The Banner: Hmm okay, sorry. It's just that it seemed annoying to me the fact that you appeared to be stalking my edits. I guess that's just how wikipedia works, and maybe I souldn't have minded that. Well, sorry FabulousFerd (talk) 02:36, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That you think that I am stalking you, is exclusively your idea. But the way you act gives me a case for concern... The Banner talk 09:03, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 02:34, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FabulousFerd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@Bbb23:@John: Look, I'm freaking tired of this. I am being a good contributor to this project. I don't think it is fair that I should be eternally punished for mistakes I made in my first account, at a time I still was new to this encyclopedia and had to get the gist of how to behave here and how to work with people. Let's just forget all of this and start over? Honestly, blocking me all the time is being a waste of time for both of us. Sincerely, FabulousFerd (talk) 6:32 pm, Today (UTC+2)

Decline reason:

We do not unblock sockpuppet accounts. You can only be unblocked from your original account. Since your talk page access is revoked, you should use the WP:UTRS system. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:16, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Bbb23 and Vanjagenije: So, my unblock request has been declined. I understand why. Actually, I didn't expect to have this account unblocked. I should have made clear I wanted my original account unblocked. So, since both of you are administrators, would you mind to allow me to edit my talk page in the Tetra quark (talk · contribs) account, so I can place my request there? I don't feel much confident in that WP:UTRS system. I just want to resolve this problem as quickly as possible to avoid even further pain. FabulousFerd (talk) 17:48, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to restore tpa at Tetra quark for you, not based on the history of your abuse at that page. You have two options: one is UTRS, regardless of your confidence; and the other is to e-mail the arbitration committee. Either way, I doubt anyone will unblock you until at least six months without socking has elapsed. The fact that you just created two sock accounts is not a good thing. Also, based on your most recent activity, I'm not impressed with your "good contributions" and your suppposed new-found ability to work with other editors.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:01, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Bbb23: I will wait for the other admins' opinion on my request to restore my tpa. And what do you mean by abuse? I just intend to place my request there. Also, if my intention is to abuse, I could abuse people here in this talk page. Me and Tetra quark are the same person. And regarding my contributions, they are just good but average contributions. Nothing too sensational. With the exception of this list I made (with my Huritisho sock) called List of exoplanets, which was so huge that it was the 5th largest Wikipedia article at the time, and I had to trim it down. You can't deny that is a very outstanding contribution. Just look at the edit history to confirm that. FabulousFerd (talk) 18:29, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
And regarding my contributions, they are just good but average contributions. Nothing too sensational.. I disagree: personal attack, accusation of stalking. The Banner talk 18:47, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I apologized for being rude, if you don't remember. FabulousFerd (talk) 18:55, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FabulousFerd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please, just give me another chance. I just want to go back to editing articles again. Just forget that I messed up in the past. Please, don't be so heartless FabulousFerd (talk) 19:45, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have two options: one is UTRS, regardless of your confidence; and the other is to e-mail the arbitration committee. No admin is going to unblock you from a sockpuppet account; if any did, they likely would lose their own privileges. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 19:49, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Jpgordon: What about a third option where you're kind enough to allow me to edit my own talk page in the Tetra quark account? :) FabulousFerd (talk) 20:58, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No. By your prior behavior, you've already exhausted all options other than those two described. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 21:27, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:FabulousFerd&oldid=1076242549"