User talk:Faizanun

Welcome!

Hello, Faizanun, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Birbal Dhar does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 22:27, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Faizanun, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Faizanun! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

Hello, I'm Ganbaruby. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Bala Hissar, Peshawar, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ◢   Ganbaruby!   (Say hi!) 16:44, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2001 Bangladesh–India border clashes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Gotitbro (talk) 11:31, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. El_C 03:50, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Jamrud. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Kansas Bear (talk) 04:23, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Alivardi (talk) 14:54, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mirpur, Pakistan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SovalValtos (talk) 18:34, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Battle of Delhi (1783), you may be blocked from editing. Alivardi (talk) 15:03, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Dewar. Dl2000 (talk) 03:25, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Delhi (1783). Alivardi (talk) 13:18, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 15:45, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Siege of Chittorgarh (1567–1568), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abdul Majid Khan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Capture of Baghdad (1534) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. - LouisAragon (talk) 20:25, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistently refraining from using edit summaries and sources. Constantly adding unsourced content. - LouisAragon (talk) 20:26, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Dogra–Tibetan War. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 08:52, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bharatpur State, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Alivardi (talk) 20:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Hephthalites, you may be blocked from editing. Wario-Man (talk) 07:08, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Kartarpur

Do not make false edits either we wikipedia have to block your account Ama975193 (talk) 11:54, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Delhi (1783). Alivardi (talk) 10:05, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at 2009 Shopian rape and murder case, you may be blocked from editing. Kautilya3 (talk) 22:13, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jat people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bharatpur.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bapuji Trimbak moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bapuji Trimbak, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 14:56, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Dewar 1606

Please post a quote for -- Stalemate --The Mughal Throne: The Saga of India's Great Emperors, Abraham Eraly, page 259. I do not see any mention for the battle or a result stating stalemate. --Kansas Bear (talk) 02:05, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Siege of Coimbatore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Chalmers.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 02:35, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This has gone on long enough; you got a dozen warnings for unsourced content and one block, and you can't be bothered to explain your edits in an edit summary or do what needs to be done in a decent encyclopedia, which is citing your sources. Drmies (talk) 02:37, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bapuji Trimbak

Hello, Faizanun. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bapuji Trimbak, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bapuji Trimbak

Hello, Faizanun. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bapuji Trimbak".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:32, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]