User talk:Gavhathehunchback

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Notability of Menucha Rachel Slonim[edit]

A tag has been placed on Menucha Rachel Slonim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Arx Fortis (talk) 04:14, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Regarding the establishment of notability....Please see the wikipedia guidelines for both notability and reliable sources. Basically, the person has to be reported on, in non-trivial ways, by more than one reliable source. --Rocksanddirt (talk) 00:02, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
I think that you can start the article again, you just need to have several written sources to prove her notability. Yehoishophot Oliver (talk) 03:35, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button Button sig2.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 00:52, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

hi[edit]

You're doing great work, keep it up! Yehoishophot Oliver (talk) 03:35, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Chabad Niggunim[edit]

A tag has been placed on Chabad Niggunim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Razorflame (talk) 07:07, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Comment[edit]

I think the edits you refer to are not mine. I have been reverting delete-happy anons, and during the revert changes that I did not necessarily make are reappearing. If you review my edit history during the past 2 days, I have been toning down language such as the type you correctly massaged tonight. Abe Froman (talk) 05:42, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Story with the Strashelyer[edit]

We really need a better source than this. Does the calendar give a source? Or can you ask R Raichik where he got it from? -- Zsero (talk) 03:07, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Judaism Newsletter[edit]

This newsletter was automatically delivered by ShepBot because you are a member of the WikiProject. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list. Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) on 04:26, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Pinchas Hirschsprung

Please provide a reference to the information about Talmud/pin test. Laudak (talk) 19:59, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Judaism Newsletter[edit]

This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list.

  • Newsletter delivery by xenobot 02:35, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

The Judaism Newsletter

This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list. As always, please direct all questions, comments, requests, barnstars, offers of help, and angry all-caps anti-semitic rants to my talk page. Thanks, and have a great month. L'Aquatique[approves|this|message] 20:31, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

  • Newsletter delivery by xenobot 21:14, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Chabad on Wikipedia arbitration request

There is a recently-filed request for arbitration that mentions you as a concerned party. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Chabad movement editors and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

Thanks, IZAK (talk) 02:23, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Arbitration case opens/Chabad movement[edit]

Hi Gavhat: Since you have been involved in the topic of Chabad, this is to let you know that an official arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Chabad movement. You may wish to add your comments for the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Chabad movement/Evidence. The ArbCom asks that evidence be submitted within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Chabad movement/Workshop. Thanks, IZAK (talk) 05:44, 10 January 2010 (UTC)