User talk:Ghoraghatalpha

This is Ghoraghatalpha's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shah Ismail Ghazi (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from http://en.banglapedia.org/index.php?title=Shah_Ismail_Ghazi_(R),. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Shah Ismail Ghazi may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hammersoft (talk) 01:36, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ghoraghatalpha! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hammersoft (talk) 01:36, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Shah Ismail Ghazi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Shah Ismail Ghazi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://en.banglapedia.org/index.php?title=Shah_Ismail_Ghazi_(R). For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hammersoft (talk) 01:36, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Shah Ismail Ghazi

Hello, Ghoraghatalpha. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Shah Ismail Ghazi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:50, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shah Ismail Ghazi (March 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by QueerEcofeminist was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please add more secondary sources to this article. It has enough content but not enough sources for verifiability. thanks

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shah Ismail Ghazi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shah Ismail Ghazi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

QueerEcofeminist^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 15:18, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shah Ismail Ghazi has been accepted

Shah Ismail Ghazi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 16:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sabrina Vourvoulias (April 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CaptainEek was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I'm not seeing how she qualifies for author notability guidelines. As Angus suggested, if you could leave a message with links to your three best sources on either his or my talk page, that would really help us figure things out.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sabrina Vourvoulias and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sabrina Vourvoulias, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 21:52, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Ghoraghatalpha! You created a thread called How the draft Draft:Shah Ismail Ghazi can be taken to Mainspace at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello Ghoraghatalpha. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Ghoraghatalpha. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ghoraghatalpha|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS ^💬 10:48, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Ghoraghatalpha! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Flora Sheffield photo, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Ghoraghatalpha! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, French/spanish references for English article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for engaging in undisclosed paid editing in violation of Wikipedia's Terms of Use.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:09, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have been blocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ghoraghatalpha (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked for Undisclosed paid editing. But I didn't do any paid job yet. I was just trying how a page can be created on Wikipedia. Please UNBLOCK ME. Ghoraghatalpha (talk) 08:17, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you. You say you haven't done any paid job yet. Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Ghoraghatalpha. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ghoraghatalpha|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}.Please be sure to read and heed WP:COI and WP:PAID. Please see WP:UPE. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 14:15, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Further discussion of possible WP:UPE

Please clarify-- Draft:Sabrina Vourvoulias, Shah Ismail Ghazi, and Draft:Filip Doušek were freebies, PAID, something else? Thanks, --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 14:22, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ghoraghatalpha (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not done any paid editing yet but I must clarify that I want to work as a paid editor. Since I don't have any client/employer yet but I want to work on Fiverr etc., should I write Fiverr as a client/employer name? Now on these pages. Draft:Sabrina Vourvoulias: I was trying to take this article into mainspace voluntarily to practice editing. Shah Ismail Ghazi: This is the first page I have ever created. Shah Ismail Ghazi's shrine is near my village. I googled him and found a lot of resources there. So I created this. Flora Sheffield: While reading about East Lynne movie on Wikipedia I found the actress's name in RED so I clicked on it and the page creation option appeared and I collected references from google and created it. Draft:Filip Doušek: The following day after creating Flora Sheffield I wanted to create the page for the author of Flock Without Birds. I found his page was in Cestina and then I translated this into English. BUT I MUST CLARIFY YOU THAT I CREATE PAGE VOLUNTARILY TO HONE MY SKILLS TO BECOME A PAID EDITOR I WILL OBEY ALL THE RULES OF WIKIPEDIA. PLEASE UNBLOCK ME. Ghoraghatalpha (talk) 19:34, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We aren't interested in having you work as a paid editor. Yamla (talk) 12:24, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock discussion

Original heading: "Paid editor" ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:46, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure how others feel about it, but this is a community building an encyclopedia. I for one take a dim view of people making money off of editing Wikipedia. This may or may not be a view held by the community in general. I will leave the unblock request for someone more open-minded than I. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 22:20, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On the other hand, your quality of writing might be good enough that you will be an asset. So long as you read and heed WP:PAID and WP:COI for each client, you should be fine. Will ask Yunshui for comment. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 22:23, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Paid_editing_(essay), the essay. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 22:25, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The idea that someone would decide to create Draft:Filip Doušek entirely off their own initiative at exactly the same time as the draft's subject hired someone via Upwork to create a page about him on en-wiki is really stretching credulity to its limits... Yunshui ^雲 _水 22:31, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speechless. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 22:34, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is disassembly afoot? Some sort of perspective arrangement would still be PAID editing. COncealing it makes it UPE --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 22:41, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ghoraghatalpha, Yunshui's message above seems to imply that you have already expected payment for the creation of Draft:Filip Doušek. However, per WP:PAID, you must disclose such expectations. Please take a moment to address the concerns voiced by Yunshui and Deepfriedokra. You can simply reply below this message. Thank you very much in advance. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:49, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I want to apologize that I saw the job on Upwork but I didn't apply for it on Upwork. I was just trying. I have understood what I am blocked for and I promise I will never do such stupid things again. Ghoraghatalpha (talk) 08:01, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There's no need to put each reply in a new unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:55, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You decided that you wanted to do paid editing on Wikipedia, so you went to Upwork to look for Wikipedia editing jobs, and then when you found one, rather than accept it, you decided to just create the article for nothing instead? Pull the other one, it's got bells on. Talkpage access revoked to prevent you from wasting more time with this sort of nonsense. Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:33, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Flora Sheffield

Hello, Ghoraghatalpha. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Flora Sheffield".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:55, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Filip Doušek

Hello, Ghoraghatalpha. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Filip Doušek".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:12, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Flora Sheffield

Hello, Ghoraghatalpha. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Flora Sheffield".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:22, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]