User talk:Guy546

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

WP:FILMS Welcome[edit]

Welcome!
Video-x-generic.svg

Hey, welcome to WikiProject Films! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of films, awards, festivals, filmmaking, and film characters. If you haven't already, please add {{User WikiProject Films}} to your user page.

A few features that you might find helpful:

  • Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.

There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

  • Want to jump right into editing? The style guidelines show things you should include.
  • Want to assist in some current backlogs within the project? Visit the Announcements template to see how you can help.
  • Want to see some great film article examples? Head on over to the spotlight department.
  • Want to know how good our articles are? Our assessment department has rated the quality of the majority of film article in Wikipedia. Check it out!

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 02:37, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

September 11 attacks[edit]

I appreciate that you are acting in good faith, but it is best if featured articles are nominated by people who have worked closely on them. In this way, they can give reasoned replies to reviewers and be familiar enough with the sources to act on suggested improvements. Someone who has not worked on the article can not provide this input, so the nomination may continue until opposition to it becomes so overwhelming that the article is failed; this takes away time from reviewers. While the September 11 attacks article is of reasonable quality, it is not yet of featured quality, and principal contributors must be consulted before a nomination, as required in the featured article candidate instructions. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:20, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010[edit]

Information.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Corey Haim. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 03:28, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Artículo bueno.svg

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock #1849044 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: Hersfold (t/a/c)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

File:EmmaWatson.jpg[edit]

Please do not upload files with false or unjustified copyright tags. Unless you own (and can prove you own) the copyright for the image, which is clearly very prolific across the internet, you are not in a position to release the work under a free content license. Happymelon 11:56, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Films March 2010 Newsletter[edit]

The March 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 03:46, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Gilligan's Island (film)[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

I have nominated Gilligan's Island (film), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gilligan's Island (film). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Mike Allen 06:08, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kaye Capron[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Kaye Capron has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:04, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bieber fever[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

A tag has been placed on Bieber fever requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Regancy42 (talk) 03:29, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (film)[edit]

The article Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (film) for things which need to be addressed. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 17:28, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILMS April Newsletter[edit]

The April 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 22:47, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Avatar[edit]

Please check your last edit at Avatar (2009 film). Thanks. --Bob K31416 (talk) 20:57, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space[edit]

Information.svg Hey there Guy546, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Guy546/Sandbox. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

  • See a log of files removed today here.
  • Shut off the bot here.
  • Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:08, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Leedewyze.jpg[edit]

Copyright-problem.svg

Thank you for uploading File:Leedewyze.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:50, 27 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 17:50, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Leedewyze.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Leedewyze.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.flickr.com/photos/37512490@N08/4624463902/in/photostream/. As a copyright violation, File:Leedewyze.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Leedewyze.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Leedewyze.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Leedewyze.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Leedewyze.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hekerui (talk) 22:38, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Lee DeWyze[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Lee DeWyze at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! The Bushranger Return fireFlank speed 01:46, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILMS May 2010 Newsletter[edit]

The May 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 03:53, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Goodarticlebot[edit]

Hello. I am in the process of creating a bot that would periodically scan the Good articles, checking to see if {{Good article}} had been placed on them, per this discussion. I noticed that you created an account called "Goodarticlebot" at the end of May (see Special:Logs/User:Goodarticlebot); are you planning to run a similar bot to what I have described? I only ask because I don't want to make a duplicate bot if you were already planning to do something like this. Please let me know if these are your intentions, or if I should go ahead with making my bot. Thanks much, Robert Skyhawk (T C B) 02:31, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Toystory3teaserposter.jpg[edit]

Copyright-problem.svg

Thank you for uploading File:Toystory3teaserposter.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Image Screening Bot (talk) 03:10, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Teaserpostertoystory3.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Teaserpostertoystory3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Image Screening Bot (talk) 04:02, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILMS June 2010 Newsletter[edit]

The June 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 05:32, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Toy-story-3-poster.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Toy-story-3-poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:36, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILMS July 2010 Newsletter[edit]

The July 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 06:04, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILMS August 2010 Newsletter[edit]

The August 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 03:52, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILM September Election Nomination Period Open[edit]

The September 2010 project coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting five coordinators from a pool of candidates to serve for the next year; members are invited to nominate themselves if interested. Please do not vote yet, voting will begin on September 15. This message has been sent as you are registered as an active member of the project. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 03:46, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests[edit]

Hi, I reverted your addition of another request to TFAR because there already five "specific date" requests, which is the maximum allowed at any time. Dabomb87 (talk) 13:58, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Arthur Bowen[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

A tag has been placed on Arthur Bowen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 03:44, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Radcliffe 1725785c.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Radcliffe 1725785c.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:05, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILMS September 2010 Newsletter[edit]

The September 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 04:22, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Re: The Twilight Saga (film series)[edit]

Huzzah! And congrats on completing your first GA review. Andrea (talk) 02:20, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Potter[edit]

I'll admit I have not really monitored the article much, so I'm sure you'll do a good job. What I will say though is 1. Do you have the ultimate DVD? I imagine that would have some stuff of use. 2. Have you checked for any books and journals? Those would be a good way to expand the design sections. Good luck, Gran2 15:30, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILM October 2010 Newsletter[edit]

The Octoberr 2010 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 00:45, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Half-Blood Prince film[edit]

I'll be willing to work with you on getting this up to GA. I'll look around for some better refs. I also spotted a "citation needed" tag in the soundtrack section. If you reply here, please leave a talkback template on my talk page so I'll know!! Thanks, Glimmer721 talk 19:58, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Do you think this is a better source instead of The Leaky Cauldron? --Glimmer721 talk 19:45, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
I've found that the fansites usually link to where they've gotten the information from--I've gotten rid of a few this way. Happy searching! --Glimmer721 talk 01:20, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Question: the ending of the "Development" section kind of runs into my differences from the book section, but the ending of it is from SnitchSeeker. Yet it is not marked with "dubious link". Should I? I couldn't find the mention of the funeral scene in all the what-you-took-out interviews I looked at. Also, reference 83 (the one tagged as "copyright violation" does not link to the right place. It goes to a TV spot rather then talking about what's in 3D--Glimmer721 talk 01:50, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Funny, Order of the Phoenix (film) is GA and it contains a lot of stuff from MuggleNet, The Leaky Cauldron, and HPANA. There's also a few dead links. (The Hollywood Reporter recently went through a redesign and for some reason none of their links are working, though.) In terms of referencing, I think Half-Blood Prince is actually better... --Glimmer721 talk 02:03, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILM November 2010 Newsletter[edit]

The November 2010 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 05:53, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

HBP update[edit]

There has been a change in the casting section of Half-Blood Prince, could you please double-check, as you have more experience than I? --Glimmer721 talk 03:01, 16 December 2010 (UTC)


Your GA nomination of The End (Lost)[edit]

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article The End (Lost) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 10 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Lord Roem (talk) 01:16, 31 December 2010 (UTC)


Your GA nomination of The End (Lost)[edit]

The article The End (Lost) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:The End (Lost) for things which need to be addressed. Lord Roem (talk) 19:18, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

WPHP Improvement[edit]

I've posted some goals for WikiProject Harry Potter on the improvement page for this year. Feel free to add and comment! --Glimmer721 talk 23:24, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM December 2010 Newsletter[edit]

The December 2010 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 04:03, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The End (Lost)[edit]

The article The End (Lost) you nominated as a good article has failed Symbol unsupport vote.svg; see Talk:The End (Lost) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. Lord Roem (talk) 22:35, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM January 2011 Newsletter[edit]

The January 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 03:13, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

The Lightning Thief PR[edit]

Oops. I began reviewing it about an hour ago but forgot to place {{doing}} on the page. Sorry, it's been a while since I've done a PR. I've posted my comments on the page; hopefully we came up with different stuff. I'd hate for you to spend a bunch of time reviewing only to paste the same types of comments! Sorry again for my lapse of memory. Melicans (talk, contributions) 19:09, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

RE:Deathly Hallows[edit]

Sure! Glimmer721 talk 20:20, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

I own The Deathly Hallows Lectures by John Granger, which explores some of the Christian allegory, literary alchemy, etc. I've also looked through the article's references...I think #29 needs a web archive link. Glimmer721 talk 21:03, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
How much do you think the Christian allegory stuff should be expanded? The book I have has a whole chapter. I think Religious debates over the Harry Potter series should hold most of the information. Glimmer721 talk 21:36, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
Fine with me, I just throught it would help organize the article. Glimmer721 talk 22:32, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
Question: how was Rowling's notebook found? Does Sharpiro's book say? Glimmer721 talk 00:33, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
I don't have time right now to add this to the article (dinner is calling!) but here's a review: [1] and I think there's another on the talk page. I might be back on later. Glimmer721 talk 23:56, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Looks to me like paperback came out on July 7, 2009 (according to Amazon). According to several fansites, there was a paperback release party. But the UK edition came out earlier, and there are several editions I think the article will be good for FAC after this. Glimmer721 talk 19:52, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
I'm think of working on Half-Blood Prince for GA, I noticed there was no critical reception. Glimmer721 talk 01:27, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
Of HPB? Sure, after I finish the reviews. Glimmer721 talk 02:14, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
Would this count as a book/film comparison? Glimmer721 talk 02:42, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
That's fine, it was simply a habit. Glimmer721 talk 23:06, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
Ah, well, at least we now have a copyeditor on the way. I'll look over it again. Anyway, what do you think of adding an audiobook section? Here is a review of the American edition, mentioning it was also awarded the Earphone award. Glimmer721 talk 22:47, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Maybe...I'm jsut having touble finding release date and British adaption info, even though I'm assuming it was released July 21st like the book. Dale also won a Grammy. Glimmer721 talk 23:07, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Re: Help[edit]

Sure, I'll take a stab. Just note that I'm fairly busy so it might take me some time. Thanks, Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 12:27, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM February 2011 Newsletter[edit]

The February 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 03:13, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Angry Dad: The Movie[edit]

Thanks for your nomination of angry dad, the movie. The reviewer said that there's just 1 little thing with the reference #6. So there is lots of chances of having it as a good article. I will notify if it becomes an good article. I am not the reviewer but I did an comment on the review page. ~~Awsome EBE123~~(talk | Contribs) 23:51, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

HP books[edit]

It looks like Deathly Hallows is shaping up, but it seems Prisoner of Azkaban, Goblet of Fire, and Half-Blood Prince may need a bit of work before we try for a GA topic. I've added critical reception to the above, leaving out two reviews I found for GoF--they were both for Entertainment Weekly by the same author, but the wording was different. Anyway, if you could just look over and see what might need to be done, that'd bee great! BTW, congrats on that GA article! Glimmer721 talk 16:13, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

There was a discussion on the talk page for removing the foreshadowing section, but I was waiting for more of a consensus before I deleted it. Glimmer721 talk 21:21, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Suggest you withdraw your requested move[edit]

In light of the overwhelmingly negative reaction to your request, you may wish to withdraw it. Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 16:58, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Many thanks. Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 03:58, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Radcliffe[edit]

Hi, just to let you know i plan to review your GA nom of Daniel Radcliffe within the next couple of days. Regards Monkeymanman (talk) 21:43, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi again, sorry but i have failed the GA nom of the article Daniel Radcliffe. Dont't despair though, the article is very nearly there as a Good article. The main sticking points that i felt were not up to standard was the refs. Too many unreliable sources are used and the awards section does not have any. If you have any other questions about how to improve the article or where its failing let me know. Monkeymanman (talk) 17:40, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM March 2011 Newsletter[edit]

The March 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 21:10, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Lincoln FAN[edit]

Edit suggestions have begun. I have fixed the first handful. Be on the lookout to fix additional ones that will be coming if you can. Carmarg4 (talk) 19:36, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for doing the FAN. I think the article was improved despite not being promoted to FA. Please keep AL on your watchlist - I did notice we were fixing a fair number of things we had straightened out before - especially the format used for footnotes and references. Thanks again, Pal. Carmarg4 (talk) 12:21, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM April 2011 Newsletter[edit]

The April 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 22:41, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM May 2011 Newsletter[edit]

The May 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 01:45, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Simpsons[edit]

Nice work on the episode articles! Keep it up :) Theleftorium (talk) 15:27, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM June 2011 Newsletter[edit]

The June 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. We are also seeking new members to assist in writing the newsletter, if interested please leave a note on the Outreach department's talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 04:38, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

The King's Speech[edit]

Hi,

Great news that you are starting to work on the King's Speech article! It's amazing how much attention the film, and the wiki article, are still receiving. Having largely written the article as it is now, I'm looking forward to see the outcome of the peer review, and I'll definitely be able to help you with the work that comes out of that. Just to give you notice, after some suggestions and references passed to me by a wikipedia colleague, I'm planning to break the visuals sub-section into its own section. Otherwise I'd be of the option that any major structural changes, deletions or rewrites would require a discussion on the talk page first. Good luck and best wishes, --Ktlynch (talk) 11:29, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your continued commitment to the article. For the sake of collaboration, could I ask you to use edit summaries to explain your edits and their rationale please? You have made a large number of minor changes without marking them as such (please do that also), many of them seem to lack a substantive reason, and others changed established convention in the article for stylistic reasons. Thanks and best wishes, --Ktlynch (talk) 18:26, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I'm sorry to keep going about this, but since the review I'm coming back to this article to perfect it. Firstly, why have you decided to change the format of references? It was acceptable before. Secondly, if you insist on changing them all can you please do it in one or two edits? Clogging up the history with 40 edits each changing one bracket or punctuation mark (in references) is simply silly. It also makes new changes hard to monitor. Best, --Ktlynch (talk) 09:59, 5 August 2011 (UTC)


So are you going to nominate it? You can do it on the talk page of the article. See here: Wikipedia:A-class film candidates/A instructions. Two uninvolved editors must agree. Best, --Ktlynch (talk) 16:07, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM July 2011 Newsletter[edit]

The July 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. We are also seeking new members to assist in writing the newsletter, if interested please leave a note on the Outreach department's talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 03:46, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Ted-williams-statue crop 340x234.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Ted-williams-statue crop 340x234.jpg, which you've sourced to bleacherreport.com. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 23:46, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM September 2011 Newsletter[edit]

The September 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Erik (talk | contribs) 16:40, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

2011 WikiProject Film coordinator election[edit]

Voting for WikiProject Film's October 2011 project coordinator election has started. We are aiming to select five coordinators to serve for the next year; please take a moment from editing to vote here by October 29! Erik (talk | contribs) 12:00, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM October 2011 Newsletter[edit]

The October 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Erik (talk | contribs) 15:04, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

GA review[edit]

Hello, I've reviewed The Falcon and the D'ohman. Please see the review page. Glimmer721 talk 16:24, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Re: Potter[edit]

I'd love to get back to working on the book articles...Goblet needs some more reviews and detail on the film section and probably a themes/style section. I think we should also add a "Development" section similar to the HBP article and put that before the plot summary. I'll work on making the plot summary more concise, too, although it's one of the longest and most complicated of the HP books. Glimmer721 talk 18:12, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

I'm thinking we work on Prisoner of Azkaban first as it appears to be closer to GA than Goblet. We also need to make sure the other books are still GA quality (no dead links, etc). A little while ago I replaced the plot summary in Chamber of Secrets which had become atrociously long and unwikified to a version in the article previously, but this was reverted because the version I put in apparently omitted one piece of information and I received a sort of friendly lecture (unsigned) on the talk page. Maybe I'll get up the courage to replace it again with the addition of that one sentence sometime in the future...also, I noticed that the Deathly Hallows plot summary has increased since our FA nom, unless that was just my eyes. Glimmer721 talk 02:05, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
What do you think we should do with the "Sales" section on Prisoner? I've got the 2008 Guinness which has a special section on HP and says how much they have sold...but then that's 4 years outdated. Glimmer721 talk 02:25, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Okay. I'll add that when I find out where my brother put the book. Glimmer721 talk 02:29, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Film November 2011 Newsletter[edit]

The December 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Peppage (talk | contribs) 22:39, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

List of accolades received by The King's Speech[edit]

Please see the comments that I and another have made concerning this article's FL submission; the suggestions are nothing that would be a major undertaking or be a serious problem. Glimmer721 talk 23:25, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Film December 2011 Newsletter[edit]

The December 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Peppage (talk | contribs) 22:05, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WIBinternationalposter.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WIBinternationalposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:08, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Wibukposter.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wibukposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:19, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Ted Williams and Stan Musial SI.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ted Williams and Stan Musial SI.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Secret account 19:03, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cultural depictions of King George VI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to West End
Pilot (Awake) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Steve Harris

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Film's January–February Newsletter[edit]

The January 2012 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

To unsubscribe, please remove your name from the distribution list. GRAPPLE X 00:39, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Awake WikiProject Proposal[edit]

I see you have worked on serveal of articles on Awake. Feel free to vote here for it to have a WikiProject. TBrandley • talk • contributions 07:04, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Also, feel free to vote on the featured list nomination for List of Awake episodes. TBrandley • talk • contributions 03:03, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

List of Awake episodes FLC[edit]

List of Awake episodes has been copy-edited. I hope you can vote on the FLC now. TBrandley 03:03, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Awake task force[edit]

Per the discussion, I think we (as WikiProject is group of people) should start the Awake task force with WikiProject Television. Do you think we should? I have a plan. Like I said, a WikiProject is group of people. TBrandley 17:01, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

"Ricky's Tacos"[edit]

I was wondering if you could write a plot summary for "Ricky's Tacos", an Awake episode. Please reply. Thanks, TBrandley 02:30, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

FAC[edit]

I was wondering if you could vote at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Awake (TV series)/archive1 for Awake (TV series)! Thanks! TBrandley 05:27, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Awake FA[edit]

I would be very appreciative it you could help fix some issues at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Awake (TV series)/archive1. Thanks for replying! TBrandley 03:18, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Awake[edit]

If you would like to join the Awake task force, please let me know. Thanks, TBrandley 15:38, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for joining the Awake task force![edit]

Hello Guy546, and welcome to the Awake task force! I would like to thank you for joining the project, and I look forward to collaborating with you! We announce tasks and projects on the talk page of the project, and I encourage you to take part in the tasks. If you have any questions about the project, or anything, do not hesitate to ask me. TBrandley 03:04, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Awake task force[edit]

Since your a member of the project, feel free to place the {{User WP AWK}} template on your user page. Cheers, TBrandley 02:29, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Frankenstein (2015 film) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frankenstein (2015 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frankenstein (2015 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bbb23 (talk) 03:13, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest[edit]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Guy546. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)