User talk:HrDansk

Welcome!

Hello, HrDansk! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 15:31, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Ways to improve Iron chic

Hi, I'm Xyzspaniel. HrDansk, thanks for creating Iron chic!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Add some reference to reliable sources, such as coverage in national press, in order to establish that this band are notable

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. XyzSpaniel Talk Page 13:47, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Iron chic

Hello HrDansk,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Iron chic for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. XyzSpaniel Talk Page 13:57, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jon C. Teaford

The article Jon C. Teaford has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Boleyn (talk) 11:18, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Nordic Association for American Studies) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Nordic Association for American Studies, HrDansk!

Wikipedia editor Robertgombos just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I added some references to Nordic Association for American Studies article. Please note that newly created articles which are unsourced are quite easily subject to Speedy Deletion. I also stubbed your article since is very short. If you expand it by using more sourced information, please feel free to unstub it. Cheers!

To reply, leave a comment on Robertgombos's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Robertgombos (talk) 21:57, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nina Baym, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Radcliffe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:14, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reading protocol moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Reading protocol, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 15:54, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Quentin Skinner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Synchronic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:50, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Reading protocol concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Reading protocol, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Reading protocol

Hello, HrDansk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Reading protocol".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 13:21, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Change and continuity

The article Change and continuity has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sources seem out-of-context, the article is a mess, jumping around multiple topics with no apparent logical line.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. EpicPupper 20:43, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Change and continuity for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Change and continuity is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Change and continuity until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

EpicPupper 04:50, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]