User talk:HunteWinchester123

WWE Diva

Please stop reverting my edits to WWE Diva in the NXT section without a reason. This article is supposed to be an overall history of the Divas, not a week-by-week or play-by-play. Not every title defense or storyline should be included (especially since the page is already [[WP::TOOLONG]]). Other changes I made that shouldn't be reverted:

Removing "world-renowned wrestler" from Sara Del Ray (see WP:PEACOCK)
Overlinking or not linking the first time a phrase shows up
Saying Charlotte was the oldest champion at 28 (WP:OR and WP:TRIVIA)

Thanks. Nikki♥311 14:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Usuário:HunteWinchester123

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —Largo Plazo (talk) 20:27, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maryse Ouellet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Morrison. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Usuário Discussão:HunteWinchester123

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Usuário Discussão:HunteWinchester123 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Pastorma (talk) 16:44, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Civility issues

I realize you are editing articles about people whose usual mode of communication involves physical assault and bellowing insults at one another,[1] but please remember that civility is important here on WP. So we need to communicate politely, even when someone annoys us. If the person or people with whom you are in a dispute is violating policy, please report them. Otherwise, Stay cool when the editing gets hot. - CorbieV ^☊ ☼ 23:45, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from WWE Women's Championship into WWE Diva. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:15, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TheBellaTwins1445

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Trouting!

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Now that I have your attention, I am strongly urging you and TheBellaTwins1445 to head to the Maryse Ouellet talk page and calmly talk out your differences. No more blind reverts or edit warring on the article, otherwise I'll make use of my admin bit and start handing out involuntary Wikibreaks to folks. P.S. I've left an identical message on TheBellaTwins1445' page. Tabercil (talk) 04:24, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello HunteWinchester123. I saw you added a source by Ryan Clark of prowrestling.com as a reference. Please read WP:PW/RS, both the writer and the website are unreliable, do not use them. A non-exhaustive list of unreliable sources is provided there, please stick to confirmed reliable ones. You can find reliable sources with the link in WP:PW/RS. starship.paint ~ KO 01:29, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Dolph Ziggler does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! RunnyAmiga ※ talk 18:29, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, HunteWinchester123. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, HunteWinchester123. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 01:59, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HunteWinchester123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I've been blocked for two years now and to be honest I didn't even know about it until now. I imagine the reason was a war over which photo to use on the WWE Divas Championship page. Well, I would like to remove this block. It's been two years and the reason is small. I don't even want to edit that page anymore. Please, all I want is to use my sandbox.

Decline reason:

If you have different editing interests now, please tell what those might be; you won't be unblocked to just edit your sandbox. There must be contributions you wish to make to the encyclopedia. 331dot (talk) 11:17, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

For the reviewing admin, note that checkuser data shows no evidence of recent block evasion. Drmies is the blocking admin. --Yamla (talk) 17:23, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla Is this still a checkuser block? (just want to help out if I can) 331dot (talk) 10:32, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would say this is no longer a checkuser block; my check has cleared that part of it. You should still check in with the blocking admin, of course (always a good idea). Sorry for not being specifically clear, I know this is a danger area when dealing with unblock requests. :) --Yamla (talk) 11:02, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

331dot I want to translate, bring new content and new pages about telenovelas to wikipedia EN. That is all. I want to collaborate on telenovelas. I really don't believe that changing a photo on a page is a reason to be blocked from everything, especially for almost two years. --HunteWinchester123 (talk) 16:48, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You will need to make another unblock request for someone else to review. 331dot (talk) 16:53, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How do I do this? 331dot --HunteWinchester123 (talk) 12:31, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You do it exactly as you did your first unblock request, placing a new one below. 331dot (talk) 14:01, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]