User talk:ISAAC CARES

Welcome!

Hello, ISAAC CARES, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Kaizenify (talk) 05:19, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Slow down

You need to slow down and take more care when adding images - rapid fire addition of images is helpful to no one and does not improve articles. Images should be representative of the subject, clear and useful. Not low quality, focused on one aspect when it is an article about a region, locality etc...further. this is obviously not representative of anything. PICKLEDICAE🥒 20:34, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And at Christopher Lake, which is a village, you added a picture of a lake. I'm also cautioning you to slow down. Please take a moment to read MOS:IMAGES. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:18, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And at Argyle Lake State Park, can you figure out why the photo you added isn't showing? Did you even look at your edit after you made it? Magnolia677 (talk) 20:23, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And at Lake Way, which is a dry saline in Australia, you added a picture of Eibsee, a lake in Germany. — AdrianHObradors (talk) 20:24, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And at Budd Lake (Michigan), you added a low-quality image (it's too dark). But the editor who took the photo is still active. Why not write the editor and ask if you can brighten their photo? Wouldn't that be better? Magnolia677 (talk) 20:26, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ISAAC CARES if you continue adding photos without addressing the massive issues you've caused, I will be requesting a block. This is out of control. PICKLEDICAE🥒 20:39, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review. I want to sincerely apologize for not being sensitive to the things you mentioned. For Christopher lake and Lake Way there was a mixup there. And I am really sorry. For Argyle Lake State Park, I saw the image of the lake but there was no where to add it in the source code. I added Image_skyline in the info box but to my surprise the image didn't come up. I also took notice of it. I will be more cautious next time. ISAAC CARES (talk) 21:08, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That isn't even close to the only issue, for example, this which is utter nonsense and shows you're being completely careless with no care about quality, just quantity. PICKLEDICAE🥒 21:12, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Joke Silva

added a link pointing to Director

Pete Edochie

added a link pointing to Administrator

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Yinka Shonibare. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please stop linking common words and countries and have a look at MOS:OVERLINK, thank you. Felida⁹⁷ (talk) 19:24, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing them out to me. I will take necessary caution ISAAC CARES (talk) 19:55, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dennis Osadebay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pioneer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leks School League (February 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Leks School League and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 12:43, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ISAAC CARES! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 12:43, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Leks School League

Hello, ISAAC CARES. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Leks School League, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:05, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ISAAC CARES (September 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ISAAC CARES and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:20, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:ISAAC CARES

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:ISAAC CARES, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Passenger pigeon (talk) 14:25, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:ISAAC CARES

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:ISAAC CARES, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Passenger pigeon (talk) 14:26, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Bbb23 (talk) 15:19, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock-spamun|LORDYOOH|I apologise for the content I pulled up. I must say I am just enthusiastic editor. I do not have any connection with the organization but I felt it was mentioned as the best in Nigeria that made me think it will be a good fit for a wikipedia article. I apologise for not paying good attention. It is actuallymy second article. The first one wasnt published too due to insufficient reference. I promise this will not happen again as I will pay more attention going forward. For my username, Isaac Cares is a nickname from high school days and thats what I use for most of my social platforms. Once again, I apologise}} ISAAC CARES (talk) 19:01, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request to be Unblocked

This user is asking to be unblocked to request a change in username.

ISAAC CARES (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

LORDYOOH (talk · account availability check · rename user)

Request reason:

I apologise for the content I pulled up. I must say I am just enthusiastic editor. I do not have any connection with the organization but I felt it was mentioned as the best in Nigeria that made me think it will be a good fit for a wikipedia article. I apologise for not paying good attention. It is actuallymy second article. The first one wasnt published too due to insufficient reference. I promise this will not happen again as I will pay more attention going forward. For my username, Isaac Cares is a nickname from high school days and thats what I use for most of my social platforms. Once again, I apologise

Administrators should consider discussing any unblock with the blocking administrator (see the blocking policy).

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, please replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-un on hold | 1=blocking administrator | 2=LORDYOOH | 3=I apologise for the content I pulled up. I must say I am just enthusiastic editor. I do not have any connection with the organization but I felt it was mentioned as the best in Nigeria that made me think it will be a good fit for a wikipedia article. I apologise for not paying good attention. It is actuallymy second article. The first one wasnt published too due to insufficient reference. I promise this will not happen again as I will pay more attention going forward. For my username, Isaac Cares is a nickname from high school days and thats what I use for most of my social platforms. Once again, I apologise | 4=~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=LORDYOOH | reason=I apologise for the content I pulled up. I must say I am just enthusiastic editor. I do not have any connection with the organization but I felt it was mentioned as the best in Nigeria that made me think it will be a good fit for a wikipedia article. I apologise for not paying good attention. It is actuallymy second article. The first one wasnt published too due to insufficient reference. I promise this will not happen again as I will pay more attention going forward. For my username, Isaac Cares is a nickname from high school days and thats what I use for most of my social platforms. Once again, I apologise | accept=Allowing username change to requested username. Please select an option from [[Wikipedia:Changing username]] and file a request as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, replacing {{subst:Decline reason here}} with any specific rationale. If you do not edit the text after "decline=", a default reason why the request was declined will be inserted.

{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=LORDYOOH | reason=I apologise for the content I pulled up. I must say I am just enthusiastic editor. I do not have any connection with the organization but I felt it was mentioned as the best in Nigeria that made me think it will be a good fit for a wikipedia article. I apologise for not paying good attention. It is actuallymy second article. The first one wasnt published too due to insufficient reference. I promise this will not happen again as I will pay more attention going forward. For my username, Isaac Cares is a nickname from high school days and thats what I use for most of my social platforms. Once again, I apologise | decline={{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

ISAAC CARES (talk) 19:13, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bbb23, can you have another look at this block? I don't understand why this editor was blocked for the reason given. I don't see any evidence that they've tried to promote anything called "ISAAC CARES"? Is it because of Draft:ISAAC CARES? This isn't about something named ISAAC CARES as far as I can tell; I assume the title was an error from moving it from the userpage to draftspace. -- asilvering (talk) 00:16, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Asilvering: I agree that the block rationale is partly wrong. No username violation. However, I oppose an unblock. Besides the draft that was deleted, the user created other promotional pages. Finally, when glancing at the user's edits, most of them are violations of WP:OLINK, and others are disruptive in other ways. I don't think the user is sufficiently competent to edit here.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:44, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, @ISAAC CARES, it looks like you don't have any need to change your username, and you can keep the one you've got if you like. For the article you tried to create on Templars Law, you might be right that it would be a good fit for a Wikipedia article, but your draft looked promotional and didn't have many references. It also looks like it was written by an AI chatbot - did you use an AI to draft it? -- asilvering (talk) 01:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reaching out. I wrote the article with a bit of help from chatgpt. Apologies for that ISAAC CARES (talk) 15:20, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, my suggestion is that if you're unblocked, you don't use ChatGPT or some other AI at all. There are a lot of reasons for this, but one of them is WP:BACKWARD and another is that it will always come out promotional-feeling. ChatGPT is trained to be weirdly perky about everything, and it will just freely make up things that aren't true, so it's pretty useless for writing wikipedia articles.

If you wanted to make an article on Templars that wasn't promotional, you'd have to start from good, independent sources. Have a look at WP:RS. Can you find any of those? -- asilvering (talk) 20:07, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I can thank you so kindly @Asilvering. All you have said is well noted. I will surely do better next time. I am grateful ISAAC CARES (talk) 21:19, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the ambiguity. The "Can you find any of those?" wasn't rhetorical. It's more like a test. It's ok to fail the test - you don't need to get it right on the first try. But we'll want to see that you understand the guidelines before unblocking you. Happy to help you through it. -- asilvering (talk) 21:47, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Asilvering I have gone through the guidlines thoroughly and I understand it very clearly. You mentioned the test partwhicb I do not clearly understand. Can you shed more light on it please.

Thank you in anticipation ISAAC CARES (talk) 19:33, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to see if you understand the reliable source guidelines. Can you find a reliable source that discusses Templars Law to show that you do? If you can't find any reliable sources about the topic, you could also show the unreliable sources you've found and explain why they're unreliable. -- asilvering (talk) 20:37, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]