User talk:Jakec/Archive 17

Archive 10

←

Archive 15

Archive 16

Archive 17

Archive 18

Archive 19

Archive 20

Messages from June 28, 2015 to July 29, 2015

Talk:River Tone/GA1

Thanks for your patience at Talk:River Tone/GA1. I'm now back and hope all your previous concerns have been met -particularly about hydrology and water quality. Would you be kind enough to let me know if there is anything still outstanding?— Rod ^talk 20:02, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Scotch Run

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Scotch Run you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Editorofthewiki -- Editorofthewiki (talk) 02:21, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

No, it it didn't. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 16:41, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Scotch Run The article Scotch Run you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Scotch Run for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Editorofthewiki -- Editorofthewiki (talk) 13:21, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Meredith Creek

Hello! Your submission of Meredith Creek at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 20:43, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Fall Brook (Lackawanna River)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:21, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Wilson Creek (Lackawanna River)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:06, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Use of the template

Hello Jakec, please make sure that when you use this template, you don't allow nonsense conversions like you did on Meredith Brook which I fixed for you. Your articles are getting a lot of main page exposure so it would be great if we could minimise this kind of embarrassing oversight. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:36, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, I will try to keep that in mind in the future. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 23:00, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Meredith Brook

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:56, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Muncy Creek

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Muncy Creek you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 13:20, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Little Nescopeck Creek

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Little Nescopeck Creek you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 13:21, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Little Catawissa Creek

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Little Catawissa Creek you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 13:21, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Black Creek (Susquehanna River)/GA1

I had some things come up with regards to my (old) job and going back to school and ultimately cannot finish the review. I just couldn't access the necessary articles, and I need to start finding a topic for my thesis project for my honors courses in the fall, so most of my work on Wikipedia will be revolved around it. Please respond when you get this, and find someone else to do what I couldn't with the article. Thanks for reading. LeftAire (talk) 19:26, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

All right, thanks for letting me know. I see another reviewer has already begun. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 23:00, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nominations

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/West Branch Lackawanna River at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 00:56, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Winfield Creek at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 00:56, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Black Creek (Susquehanna River)

The article Black Creek (Susquehanna River) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Black Creek (Susquehanna River) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LeftAire -- LeftAire (talk) 01:01, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Black Creek (Susquehanna River)

The article Black Creek (Susquehanna River) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Black Creek (Susquehanna River) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LeftAire -- LeftAire (talk) 04:01, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Clarks Creek (Lackawanna River)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:26, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Muncy Creek

The article Muncy Creek you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Muncy Creek for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 13:20, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Little Nescopeck Creek

The article Little Nescopeck Creek you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Little Nescopeck Creek for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 13:01, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Google Books

When editing your article Pancoast Creek I noticed that you did not seem to know about the Google books citation tool which is helpful in producing references for book sources. I have found it useful. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:36, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Muncy Creek

The article Muncy Creek you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Muncy Creek for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 06:01, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Price Creek

Gatoclass (talk) 10:33, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Pancoast Creek

Gatoclass (talk) 10:33, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of rivers of Pennsylvania

added a link pointing to Lees Creek

White Hall Creek

added a link pointing to WHLM

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for West Branch Lackawanna River

Thanks for your help Victuallers (talk) 12:01, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Muncy Creek

Hello! Your submission of Muncy Creek at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! CeeGee 20:23, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Lake Rose (Pennsylvania)

Gatoclass (talk) 12:02, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Little Nescopeck Creek

The article Little Nescopeck Creek you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Little Nescopeck Creek for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 13:41, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Callender Gap Creek

Gatoclass (talk) 00:41, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Fiddle Lake Creek

Gatoclass (talk) 00:11, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Little Catawissa Creek

The article Little Catawissa Creek you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Little Catawissa Creek for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 12:01, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for List of tributaries of the Lackawanna River

The DYK project (nominate) 12:02, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Holy Cross Church, Lehre

Hi, I added an image to this nomination and also rewrote the hook so it makes more sense. Would you mind looking at it again for an approval? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 13:36, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/1630 Crete earthquake

Hi, please see note on your DYK review. Yoninah (talk) 18:55, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Lake Jean

Thank you for helping create Wikipedia Victuallers (talk) 00:02, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Chillisquaque Creek at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 05:53, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Meredith Creek

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chillisquaque Creek, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sunfish, Bluebell and Mint. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Hicks Creek (Susquehanna River)

Hello! Your submission of Hicks Creek (Susquehanna River) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 20:58, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Pictures in tables

Road tables are not supposed to include pictures in them as they are clutter and take up space. If you want to add a picture of one of the quadrant routes to the article feel free to add one to the top of the list in the lead. Dough4872 01:57, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Another option would be to include a gallery of the pictures below the table instead of the notes column, as that should be used for written notes. Dough4872 01:58, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Featured lists--the gold standard for lists--require images. I see no reason why any list should be scrubbed of them and shall continue to add more. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 12:18, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Winfield Creek

Thank you Victuallers (talk) 00:07, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Lees Creek (Lackawanna River)

Gatoclass (talk) 12:02, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Hicks Creek (Susquehanna River)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:06, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Your reversion to Jeddo Tunnel

Hello Jakec,

Please further explain your reversion, either on the article's talk page or mine. Simply stating that you think some relevent content was removed is not sufficient. Your reversion removed several citations I added for verifable empirical facts. The article's grammar is arguably poor and several sections mix historical with current descriptive content. I'm going to allow some time for you to respond before I revert back the many changes I did.

Respectfully,

Pageographer 23:39, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

The article was already perfectly referenced, therefore any additional citations would be redundant. I did not see you add any citations; only removing reliably sourced content. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 23:48, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Please cite specific examples where "reliably sourced content" was removed. I added a citation of a report by SRBC and it is referenced twice in the article, as reference #5.--User:Pageographer (talk)

Rue Stanley, Montréal

Thanks so much for your correction to my page, to make it a REDIRECT to (the misnamed) Stanley Street (Montreal).

Sure, no problem. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 02:00, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Racket Brook

Hello! Your submission of Racket Brook at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 02:15, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Gardner Creek (Susquehanna River)

Materialscientist (talk) 13:37, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Woodland Meadows

reconsider? Created by people who are very likely undisclosed paid editors per Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Woodland_Meadows and sourced only to WP:SPS. Doesn't get much more promotional than that... Jytdog (talk) 18:48, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

@Jytdog: I wasn't aware that it was written by paid editors, but I still judge G11s solely by the article content. The text in this case seems relatively neutral and informative, free from promotional language. AFAICT, there are at least two references to The Columbus Dispatch, one to Columbus Underground, and two to official documentation. I have no strong opinion on the subject's notability, so (as I explained in my edit summary), I have no prejudice against AFD.

BTW, it really does get a lot more promotional than that. I've seen it for myself. ;) --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 19:38, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

thanks for replying! i hear you. Jytdog (talk) 19:44, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Papakating Creek

In case you're curious, the sandboxed beginning of a draft for a rewrite of Papakating Creek. The level of detail to be expected here is appropriate for a 20-mile river through the northern half of a county. For a 2.4 mile stream you can walk down the centre of without fully immersing your shoes, of which no one has deemed significant enough to address with its own reliable sources, Neepaulakating Creek is IMHO appropriately scaled. Comparatively, neither of them are the Amazon. JackTheVicar (talk) 19:26, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Neepaulakating Creek GA

Are you going to complete the review? because I think your comment of "you complete it, I don't really care" was rather flippant--like a thwarted kid picking up his toys and going home. Finish what you started, otherwise I can only assume to characterise the delay of the last two days--while you worked on other things--to be purposefully dilatory and petulant in light of the outcome of the requested second opinion.JackTheVicar (talk) 13:09, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Powderly Creek

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:32, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Racket Brook

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:47, 29 July 2015 (UTC)