Jump to content

User talk:Kajox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Amenic Film requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:10, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Wordlessness has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tinton5 (talk) 23:58, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Welcome to Wikipedia! Need a hand?[edit]

Hii Sara;

i did some work and added some information to the page shokof.please, let me know if i have done OK? i searched the web sites and just placed them in as the related material. i hope this is a positive start as the page is really infant rrelative to the works and history regarding shokof. thank you marie



Teahouse logo
Hello! Kajox, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SarahStierch (talk) 07:36, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sarah thank you for your reply.i am not dissapointed with rejections but rather confused as i do not understand the reasons for any of the deletion reasons? Mr.Shokf's works are public and i do know much about it since i work with him and am a partner in the Shif Productions.I am Marie Selva.so much for that and the confusion comes where i almost wrote the same info. about our other pictures by Daryush Shokof and it seems to be OK? another issue is that his name gets scratched from lists that somehow were there for even years and then suddenly not any longer?! who does these things?! Mr.Shokof himself is not even aware of the works we all do about his works through international channels so that more people of informed about the works of this diverse and important "thinker" the least. i tried to just write what is already been talked about the importance of Amenic Filmmaking and yet it is rejected? or the Yekishim philosophy which has it's own site as well, and or him "Shokof" being a Notable director, which he has been often labled as a most original voice in cinema, and yet his Amenic gets elimination?! perhaps, yes, it would be greatest to have you assisting me on these matters. i remain thankful and appreciate your considerations in advance best marie selva

Conflict of interest[edit]

Please read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. --Sitacuisses (talk) 19:49, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Answer to Helpdesk question[edit]

Hello, Kajox. You have new messages at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#wordlessness.2C_Amenic_Film.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:17, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Are you yourself Daryus Shokof?[edit]

If so, I strongly suggest you read Wikipedia:Autobiography.

At this point it appears you may be Shokof or his associate, or just an individual very enthused about his work, but in any case the way you're going about it is not going to work for you. Rather than working within the Wikipedia system, you're bucking against it, which must be quite frustrating. If you slow down your pace and take in some of the advice given to you, you may be able to properly publish these articles you're working on, but if you keep fighting, it's just going to get material deleted.

Have you considered swinging by the Teahouse to get some advice from volunteer mentors? MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:05, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

i rather stop and no as i wrote to you i am marie. thank you anyway best to you marie

October 2012[edit]

Hello, Kajox. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:34, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Marie selva has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication that the subject meets the notability guidelines for inclusion. No significant third-party coverage found.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. §FreeRangeFrog 04:33, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Sfgiants1995. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Maximalism because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Sfgiants1995 (talk) 02:20, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Daryush Shokof (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Pathfinder, David Warner, Utube, John Chamberlain and Jack Taylor

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

The article MOON and 8 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability - does not appear to meet WP:NFF

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 17:29, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Daryush Shokof (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Atomic, Antenna, Persian, Psycho, Kunsthaus and Unity
MOON and 8 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to SFX

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Deletion discussion about MOON and 8[edit]

Hello, Kajox,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether MOON and 8 should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MOON and 8 .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Bensci54 (talk) 22:18, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Yekishim, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:13, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. JMHamo (talk) 17:57, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Strange Stranger has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sign of meeting WP:NFILM. Unreferenced article. Google search for "strange stranger" Shokof finds zero reviews, just database listings. Rotten Tomatoes has zero reviews (I counted 'em twice to be sure!) No Google Books results actually indicating this film.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 21:01, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]