Jump to content

User talk:Khoenr

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Khoenr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! xC | ☎ 12:38, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

India quick links

Links for Wikipedians interested in India-related content

This is a collection of links to WikiProject pages and Category pages relevant to India-related content

Region	India States Districts Cities
Religion	Hinduism Buddhism Jainism Sikhism Zoroastrianism Islam Christianity
State	Andhra Pradesh Arunachal Pradesh Assam Bihar Chhattisgarh Goa Gujarat Haryana Himachal Pradesh Jharkhand Karnataka Kerala Madhya Pradesh Maharashtra Manipur Meghalaya Mizoram Nagaland Odisha Punjab Rajasthan Sikkim Tamil Nadu Telangana Tripura Uttar Pradesh Uttarakhand West Bengal
UTs	Andaman and Nicobar Islands Chandigarh Dadra and Nagar Haveli Daman and Diu Delhi Jammu and Kashmir Lakshadweep Puducherry
Cities	Chennai Hyderabad Mangalore Mumbai Patna
Culture	Translation Classical Tamil Literature Hindustani and allied languages Music Cinema Television
Other	Education Geography Localisation Caste system Trade History Maps Politics Indian portals Military history Biodiversity, Protected areas & Environment Transport (Railways & Roads) Indian and Pakistani Wikipedians cooperation board

Indian Wikipedians (add [[Category:Wikipedians in India]] to your userpage)
India category
Wikimedia India English mailing list
Wikimedia India mailing list

utcursch | talk 08:04, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Trivia

Please do not re-add trivia sections that have been removed from articles. Trivia sections are frowned upn on Wikipedia (see WP:TRIV) and the one that you insist on re-adding to the Amitabh Bachchan article is a classic example of why such sections are discouraged.

Achitnis 15:26, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop I

I took two hours to clean up Amitabh Bachchan's awards page, so please don't revert the page again because you were the one who messede it up. Some of the so called "awards" are not awards at all, some of them are not national at all, and some of them are not supported by reliable sites.

For example, "Voted the 'Greatest Actor' in the film personalities category" by some magazine is NOT a national award and not an award at all. I didn't remove it but move it down to a new section. Some "award" titles MUST have been removed. The fact that Desifans.com names him the best doesn't matter, for the simple fact that it's a blog.

Regards, Shahid • ^Talk2me 14:21, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop II

I took two hours to clean up Amitabh Bachchan's awards page, so please don't revert the page again because you were the one who messede it up. Some of the so called "awards" are not awards at all, some of them are not national at all, and some of them are not supported by reliable sites.

For example, "Voted the 'Greatest Actor' in the film personalities category" by some magazine is NOT a national award and not an award at all. I didn't remove it but move it down to a new section. Some "award" titles MUST have been removed. The fact that Desifans.com names him the best doesn't matter, for the simple fact that it's a blog.

Regards, Shahid • ^Talk2me 17:00, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Bengal Film Journalists' Association - Best Actor Award

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Bengal Film Journalists' Association - Best Actor Award, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Bengal Film Journalists' Association - Best Actor Award is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Bengal Film Journalists' Association - Best Actor Award, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 09:00, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

Please stop changing the nominations on Filmfare Best Actor Award. Bachchan has received 26 nominations, not 28. Shahid • ^Talk2me 13:33, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

STOP it

This is the last warning you will receive for your false edits. Bachchan received ONE nomination in 1983, not three. Shahid • ^Talk2me 11:36, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No no no - it was ONE nomination for THREE roles - see the official site if you want. Shahid • ^Talk2me 11:31, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This was the time when Filmfare were giving only five nominations per year, they gave him one nomination for three movies - BollywoodHungama is nothing compared to the official site. See this. Anyway - if you choose to take things as you want to, it's your problem. Please stop reverting the article to your version. Done here. Shahid • ^Talk2me 15:34, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stop duplicating information!!Dr. Blofeld 10:54, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for Best Actor Award of Hindi Section

It would great if u could provide details of nominations received for best actor awards in Hindi Section of BJFA Awards from 1953-2010. Infact the awrds from 1967-1987 is neededShrik88music (talk) 13:33, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Guide to referencing

Click on "show" on the right of the orange bar to open contents.

Using references (citations)

Help another user by posting this to them. Put {{subst:refstart}} on their talk page or a relevant article talk page. Alternatively, use the link WP:REFB, which goes to a help page.

I thought you might find it useful to have some information about references (refs) on wikipedia. These are important to validate your writing and inform the reader. Any editor can remove unreferenced material; and unsubstantiated articles may end up getting deleted, so when you add something to an article, it's highly advisable to also include a reference to say where it came from. Referencing may look daunting, but it's easy enough to do. Here's a guide to getting started. If you need any assistance, let me know. -- Ty 08:15, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good references

A reference must be accurate, i.e. it must prove the statement in the text. To validate "Mike Brown climbed Everest", it's no good linking to a page about Everest, if Mike Brown isn't mentioned, nor to one on Mike Brown, if it doesn't say that he climbed Everest. You have to link to a source that proves his achievement is true. You must use reliable sources, such as published books, mainstream press, and authorised web sites. Blogs, Myspace, Youtube, fan sites and extreme minority texts are not usually acceptable, nor is original research (e.g. your own unpublished, or self-published, essay or research), or another wikipedia article.

Inserting a reference

The first thing you have to do is to create a "Notes and references" section (unless it already exists). This goes towards the bottom of the page, below the "See also" section and above the "External links" section. Enter this code:

==Notes and references==

{{reflist}}

The next step is to put a reference in the text. Here is the code to do that. It goes at the end of the relevant term, phrase, sentence, or paragraph to which the note refers, and after punctuation such as a full stop, without a space (to prevent separation through line wrap):

<ref> </ref>

Whatever text you put in between these two tags will become visible in the "Notes and references" section as your reference.

Test it out

Open the edit box for this page, copy the following text (inserting your own text where indicated), paste it at the bottom of the page and save the page:

==Reference test==

This is the text which you are going to verify with a reference.<ref>Reference details go here</ref>

==Notes and references==

{{reflist}}

(End of text to copy and paste.)

It should appear like this:

Reference test

This is the text which you are going to verify with a reference.^[1]

Notes and references

^ Reference details go here

Information to include

You need to include the information to enable the reader to find your source. For an online newspaper source, it might look like this:

<ref>Plunkett, John. [http://media.guardian.co.uk/site/story/0,14173,1601858,00.html "Sorrell accuses Murdoch of panic buying"], ''[[The Guardian]]'', 2005-10-27. Retrieved on 2005-10-27.</ref>

When uploaded, it appears as:

Plunkett, John. "Sorrell accuses Murdoch of panic buying", The Guardian, 2005-10-27. Retrieved on 2005-10-27.

Note the single square brackets around the URL and the article title. The format is:

[http://URL "Title of article"]

Make sure there is a space between the URL and the Title. This code results in the URL being hidden and the title showing as a link. Use double apostrophes for the article title (it is quoted text), and two single quote marks either side of the name of the paper (to generate italics). Double square brackets round the name of the paper create an internal link (a wikilink) to the relevant wikipedia article. Apostrophes must go outside the brackets.

The date after The Guardian is the date of the newspaper, and the date after "Retrieved on" is the date you accessed the site – useful for searching the web archive in case the link goes dead.

References not online

You can use sources which are not online, but which you have found in a library or elsewhere—in which case leave out the information which is not relevant. The newspaper example above would be formatted like this:

<ref>Plunkett, John. "Sorrell accuses Murdoch of panic buying", ''[[The Guardian]]'', 2005-10-27.</ref>

When uploaded, it appears as:

Plunkett, John. "Sorrell accuses Murdoch of panic buying", The Guardian, 2005-10-27.

Here is an example for a book:

<ref>Charmley, John (2006). ''The Princess and the Politicians'', p.60. Penguin Books Ltd., London. ISBN 0140289712.</ref>

When uploaded, it appears as:

Charmley, John (2006). The Princess and the Politicians. Penguin Books Ltd., London. ISBN 0140289712.

Make sure you put two single quote marks round the title (to generate italics), rather than one double quote mark.

Date format

These formats are all acceptable for dates:

2005-01-27

27 January 2007

January 27, 2007

Citation templates

You may prefer to use a citation template to compile details of the source. The template goes between the ref tags and you fill out the fields you wish to. Basic templates can be found here: Wikipedia:Template messages/Sources of articles/Citation quick reference

Same ref used twice or more

The first time a reference appears in the article, you can give it a simple name in the <ref> code:

<ref name="smith">Details of ref here</ref>

The second time you use the same reference in the article, you need only to create a short cut instead of typing it all out again:

<ref name="smith"/>

You can then use the short cut as many times as you want. Don't forget the /, or it will blank the rest of the article! Some symbols don't work in the ref name, but you'll find out if you use them. The quotes around the name are optional unless there is a space in the name.

You can see multiple use of the same refs in action in the article William Bowyer (artist). There are three sources and they are each referenced three times. Each statement in the article has a footnote to show what its source is.

Alternative system

The above method is simple and combines references and notes into one section. A refinement is to put the full details of the references in their own section headed "References", while the notes which apply to them appear in a separate section headed "Notes". The notes can be inserted in the main article text in an abbreviated form as seen in Harriet Arbuthnot or in a full form as in Brown Dog affair.

Further information

More information can be found at:

Notice

Please use a proper formatting of references. It's not enough to use "[http...url.com]" - please consider it. You have already been notified about it but did not bother to work according to this generous guidance. Sorry, but you will have to do it. Also remember to use reliable sources. If you do not use the proper format and do not adhere to policy your edits will not be accepted. Shahid • ^Talk2me 10:48, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I saw you have deleted so many articles from the "List of Amitabh Bachchan's awards, honours and recognitions". I still don't understand that. You have also deleted Such article as, that In June 2000, Bachchan became the first living Asian to have been immortalised in wax at London's prestigious Madame Tussauds Wax Museum. Link: http://www.screenindia.com/news/art-of-cinema-is-a-small-contribution-amitabh-bachchan/441709/ and Bachchan got Honory Doctorate from the Leeds Metropolitan University in Yorkshire in 2007. Link http://www.lmu.ac.uk/internat/region/south_asia/south_asia.htm or http://gulfnews.com/news/world/india/leeds-awards-honorary-degrees-to-3-film-veterans-1.183690

Why have you deleted these 2 big international recognition of Bachchan.

List of awards and nominations received by Ajay Devgn et al

Please use reliable sources, such as mainstream newspapers (or in this particular instance the home site of the award) for citations, not forum posts, blogs, personal websites, gossip pages etc. Active Banana (^bananaphone 14:58, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Salman Khan

I have just posted on the Talk:List of awards and nominations received by Salman Khan page. There seems to be a check or two needed on the article. thanks Chaosdruid (talk) 21:19, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RS

Please start using reliable sources when you're adding awards. This has become insufferable and will no longer be tolerated. Also, please do fill in the citations using {{cite web}} and {{cite news}} parameters where required. Being a Wikipedia user for more than 3 years, it's high time you learnt to use them. Shahid • ^Talk2me 16:43, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning

Please stop vandalising the Shahrukh Khan page, while adding completely irrelevant pages to the issue. Also, the Amitabh Bachchan page is not your fansite, and stop copying verbatim sentences from other articles.

If you do it again, you will be blocked from editing. Shahid • ^Talk2me 11:09, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am not vandalising the Shahrukh Khan page, but the three articles about Shahrukh as "King of Bollywood" are old, Dec 19, 2008, February 05, 2008 and 4 August 2006. According to BoxOfficeIndia is Shahrukh since 2009 no longer more the King of Bollywood. It's Aamir Khan. And now even Salman Khan is far ahead of Shahrukh. You are wright, Wikipedia is not a fan-site. So how can Wikipedia write nonsense like Shahrukh is the King of Bollywood. He is now where close to Aamir Khan. Check this of BoxOfficeIndia http://www.boxofficeindia.com/cpages.php?pageName=top_actors If you are putting old articles to claim someone as King, than you should put also old articles on the page of Amitabh Bachchan or Dilip Kumar to claim that they are also King of Bollywood. Check also this most recent BoxOfficeIndia.Com Star Power Rankings INDIA 29/10/11 http://www.boxofficeindia.com/manage_stars.php?c=star_ranking_india So, who's the Real King? Amen

The fact that his films don't do that well today does not mean his achievements are all gone. Those who are currently the most successful, good for them. The "King of Bollywood" does not derive from who is he no. 1 at the box office now. It's a nickname, not an old one (see this and this - these are new articles. No one is really a king, but SRK is the one who's referred to by this title, there's a book called like this. BRW, so far his films do the best business in overseas markets, should not be ignored. Shahid • ^Talk2me 16:29, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited List of awards and nominations received by Amitabh Bachchan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maharashtrian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Amitabh Bachchan, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 15:15, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have change on this page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amitabh_Bachchan that Amitabh Bachchan has been nominated overall 37 times in the Filmfare Acting category. I did also change that he has been nominated for the film Aarakshan in the Filmfare Best Actor category. This is my source http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filmfare_Award_for_Best_Actor So, I didn't anything wrong. I have only updated the page of Amitabh Bachchan.

List of awards and nominations received by Amitabh Bachchan

I would appreciate if you can put your comments here. - Vivvt • (Talk) 15:52, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced changes

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Amitabh Bachchan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:13, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Khoenr. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Khoenr. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Khoenr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Khoenr&oldid=1091518824"