User talk:LOCdataLKR44
 | This user is new to Wikipedia. Please assume good faith, remain civil, and be calm, patient, helpful, and polite while they become accustomed to Wikipedia and its intricacies. |
Welcome LOCdataLKR44!
I'm Jax 0677, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your userpage.
Please remember to:
- Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp. - Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
Sincerely, Jax 0677 (talk) 16:36, 23 August 2020 (UTC) (Leave me a message)
Disambiguation link notification for September 5[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Obelisk (disambiguation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Incorrect category[edit]
Why did you add this category? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:35, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Hellfest '05 Banner.png[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Hellfest '05 Banner.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dylsss(talk contribs) 23:03, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Hellfest-2005-2.gif[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Hellfest-2005-2.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dylsss(talk contribs) 23:04, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Hellfest '05 Banner.png[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Hellfest '05 Banner.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 8[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blood Has Been Shed, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diecast.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
"Anne Productions" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Anne Productions. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 21#Anne Productions until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 16:15, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Your edits[edit]
Hello, thanks for your edits to Arthur Godfrey, but citations usually go in the body of the article, not in the lead. Graham87 02:31, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Michael Koelsch[edit]
Hello! I noticed that you recently created the article Michael Koelsch, and a lot of your recent activity seems to have involved adding his name to every single article for a work of art he was professionally involved in. Based on some searches, I'm not convinced Koelsch is notable, and I definitely think there are a number of issues with the article as it currently stands. As such, I've added a number of templates to it. We can discuss further on the article's talk page, but I think it would be a good idea if you went through the article and trimmed it down considerably to meet WP:SUMMARY style - after all, it's not a resume or portfolio. Right now it reads quite promotionally. Ganesha811 (talk) 05:00, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Repressed books[edit]
Hi, I noticed that in a number of articles, you added that a book or series was "repressed". Please go back through all of those articles and change "repressed" to "republished". I don't know if the publishing industry uses "repress" as technical jargon, but it is not a term that would be commonly understood by general readers to mean "republish" or "reissue". Thanks! Schazjmd (talk) 14:24, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Please don't fill Wikipedia with irrelevant stuff.[edit]
Good morning LOCdata. Thank you for the many hours you are putting in to improve Wikipedia. I notice that you have made about 50 edits like these: [[1]] [[2]] [[3]] [[4]] etc. One of the principles of editing is that added material must be encyclopedic. In this case please remember that Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion WP:NOTPROMO and not a directory WP:NOTDIR of everything in the universe that exists or has existed. What we are after is a balanced article, and - elsewhere, a mention of the subject if especially relevant. Have a look at the article here: Quentin Blake and here Uncle and the Treacle Trouble. This is all it needs - a passing mention in other articles where Michael Koelsch has been a major contributor to the work (and that is only if he is notable, and this is at least questionable) - in other articles where he has made a really significant contribution. In general it is also worth a look at Help:Your first article and [[5]]. With regards and all respect. Springnuts (talk) 07:00, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Michael Koelsch for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Koelsch until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
JBchrch talk 21:16, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Managing a conflict of interest[edit]
Hello, LOCdataLKR44. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --- Possibly (talk) 21:39, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Do you have a conflict of interest on Michael Koelsch? Do you know him, are you being paid to write on him, or do you have any connection with him in the real world? Some of the material you added to the article, which is massively bloated with puffery, is not mentioned in the sources. --- Possibly (talk) 22:02, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl Saff until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
--- Possibly (talk) 22:25, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of The Obelisk (magazine) for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Obelisk (magazine) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Ganesha811 (talk) 22:58, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Botchla until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Ganesha811 (talk) 23:02, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation[edit]
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/LOCdataLKR44, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
JBchrch talk 01:48, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Category:Books with cover art by Michael Koelsch has been nominated for deletion[edit]
Category:Books with cover art by Michael Koelsch has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ganesha811 (talk) 15:46, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:TheObeliskHeaderLogo.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:TheObeliskHeaderLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Category:Michael Koelsch has been nominated for deletion[edit]
Category:Michael Koelsch has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ganesha811 (talk) 18:15, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Category:Book covers by Michael Koelsch has been nominated for deletion[edit]
Category:Book covers by Michael Koelsch has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ganesha811 (talk) 18:16, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Category:Film posters by Michael Koelsch has been nominated for deletion[edit]
Category:Film posters by Michael Koelsch has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ganesha811 (talk) 18:16, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Category:Albums produced by Carl Saff has been nominated for deletion[edit]
Category:Albums produced by Carl Saff has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Οἶδα (talk) 10:02, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Concern regarding Draft:The Obelisk (magazine)[edit]
Hello, LOCdataLKR44. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Obelisk (magazine), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:The Obelisk (magazine)[edit]
Hello, LOCdataLKR44. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Obelisk".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:33, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
File:TearFromTheRedLP.jpg listed for discussion[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TearFromTheRedLP.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. (CC) Tbhotch™ 00:39, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Conquer the World Records[edit]
A tag has been placed on Category:Conquer the World Records indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:42, 13 October 2022 (UTC)