User talk:MarthaAnsara

Welcome![edit]

Hello, MarthaAnsara, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Draft:Australian Directors Guild, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Missvain (talk) 23:22, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MarthaAnsara, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi MarthaAnsara! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:11, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Russell Edwards (August 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Russell Edwards and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sionk (talk) 20:40, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Russell Edwards concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Russell Edwards, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

thanks HasteurBot I am not sure where I should be answering your letter -- sorry. I passed on the criticism of the article to the subject and asked for additional references which would demonstrate his notability. And he has not yet provided them. He IS notable s an Australian film critic -- but maybe that's not notable enough.... I will ask him once more for the references -- and if he doesn't do it asap. Then we should delete the article. I'll let you know as soon as I can. regards MarthaAnsara (talk) 05:48, 18 February 2015 (UTC)Martha Ansara[reply]

Australian Directors Guild[edit]

Dear Friends -- incl Missvain, I do not have nor have had any office or employment from the Australian Directors Guild. I am not even a board member, nor have I ever been. I am merely a long time member trying to contribute a little task that I saw needed doing -- namely, to put the history and information about the ADG on wikipedia. I find contributing to Wikipedia a bit confusing at times....but I did read the various guidelines. I don't know where there could be a conflict of interest. I have over the years written many articles about film and film business for Australian magazines and saw this as just another. Could you be more specific about what might be wrong with the article. Thanks very much for any help you can give MarthaAnsara (talk) 05:43, 18 February 2015 (UTC)Martha Ansara[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, MarthaAnsara. You have new messages at Missvain's talk page.
Message added 22:28, 18 February 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Missvain (talk) 22:28, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Australian Directors Guild has been accepted[edit]

Australian Directors Guild, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- Sam ^Sing! 00:03, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Russell Edwards[edit]

Hello MarthaAnsara. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Russell Edwards".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Russell Edwards}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 02:27, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Russell Edwards[edit]

Draft:Russell Edwards · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, MarthaAnsara, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MarthaAnsara (talk) 03:44, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Friends, I was working on the article just a matter of minutes ago when it DISAPPEARED.! Can I have it back please - I have new information. Thanks so much. Martha Ansara MarthaAnsara (talk) 03:44, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Russell Edwards concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Russell Edwards, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Russell Edwards concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Russell Edwards, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Russell Edwards[edit]

Hello, MarthaAnsara. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Russell Edwards".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find the article, as I wrote earlier and it's all just too hard! i give up. I enjoyed it but can't do it if I can't find the article that mysteriously disappeared and won't come back! MarthaAnsara (talk) 09:54, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Martha, HasteurBot isn't a person but a program written to take care of basic automated tasks. The reason the article was deleted was because it had gone stale, meaning that you hadn't edited it in six months. While the first deletion was improper given that you had started editing the article, the second deletion was proper since you hadn't resumed editing after successfully requesting that it be restored at WP:REFUND. I'm willing to restore this a second time but I need some sort of assurance that you'll work on it this time. You can do this by responding here or at the REFUND request here. I do need to warn you that if this is restored again and it doesn't get edited, it's unlikely to be restored a third time. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:18, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It's better if you do it at the REFUND page since I'll be logging off soon and might not see this talk page message, whereas there's usually an admin watching the REFUND board and can see your message before I log back in, which might be at least a day or two right now since I have some reading for school to finish. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:19, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Martha. I was curious about the Draft:Russell Edwards page, so I asked for it to be restored. Feel free to continue editing it. ★NealMcB★ (talk) 16:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Nealmcb and whoever else is out there (sorry I can't find the REFUND page) I have once again submitted my article about Russell Edwards (a different Russell Edwards to the bloke from the USA who already has a page). I have included references which verify what I have written about his activities/positions. On the whole, film critics write about others -- not very many of them are themselves the subjects of articles the way filmmakers are. But I have included plenty of references TO Russell Edwards -- as compared to articles BY him.

I originally wrote this article as i thought it would be an easy way of dipping my toe into wikipedia, and followed it with a more complex article about the Australian Directors Guild which required much more research and design. Alas, I found writing these little articles enjoyable but too difficult for me in terms of meeting the wikipedia requirements and have (at least for now) given my attempts away. However, I did want to finish what I started. Hence this final submission on Russell Edwards. Thanks to everyone who has tried to help me!! I may get a second wind. MarthaAnsara (talk) 09:19, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Russell Edwards (March 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment they left was:

All of this still questions solid notability for his own article, focus with adding any further available amount of in-depth third-party news sources overall.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Russell Edwards and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 05:00, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Russell Edwards[edit]

Hello, MarthaAnsara. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Russell Edwards".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 13:23, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]