Jump to content

User talk:Mealover

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Mealover! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 00:03, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Mealover, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Mealover! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Osarius (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Mealover

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Voorts, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Maya Aboul Hosn, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article. You may remove the deletion tag yourself once the article has at least one reliable source.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Voorts}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

voorts (talk/contributions) 23:41, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Lebanon 2024 moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Miss Lebanon 2024. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miss Lebanon 2024 (June 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OnlyNano was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
OnlyNanotalk 14:34, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nada Koussa

[edit]

Hi, nowhere in the article does it state Nada Koussa's religion. It is your responsibility to provide a source in the article body for this. Note that the religion of a beauty pageant titleholder is highly unlikely to be an essential, defining characteristics. Either remove the unsupported category per WP:CAT or add appropriate text and a reference in the article body per WP:PROVEIT. Thank you. Sciencefish (talk) 15:57, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding "stuff you know" about this person. Thank you.Magnolia677 (talk) 18:46, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Magnolia677, It's not clear whether this is direct at me (as a reply) or at Mealover? Sciencefish (talk) 19:55, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sciencefish: Sorry about that! My comment was in addition to yours. Mealover seems to be adding a lot of original research. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:57, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Nada Koussa, you may be blocked from editing. This is your third warning. Please stop adding unsourced content. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:43, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Nada Koussa. Please stop your disruptive editing. Magnolia677 (talk) 15:14, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Wburrow (talk) 19:37, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 20:27, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]