User talk:MetaGrrrl

Current Conversation

My last big project was an article on Leslie Harpold which met Wikipedia's notability standards.

Past Conversations

Strong encouragement is being applied to me to write an entry about early U.S. bartender Tom Bullock. ;)

If you do make that article about Tom Bullock, I shall love you forever. Well. Sorta. 85.229.48.166 (talk) 12:50, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Thanks, Tom Morris, for your help getting me started on my migration from Wikipedia dilettante to proper editor! I'll definitely be keeping the material below for reference for a while. MetaGrrrl (talk) 22:49, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MetaGrrrl! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! —Tom Morris (talk) 22:30, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Userfied Leslie Harpold

Hi MetaGrrrl,

I've moved a copy of the page to your userspace: User:MetaGrrrl/Leslie Harpold. You can work on it in your own time and improve it. When you think it is ready and good to go, just shout and I'll be happy to move it into mainspace if it satisfies the notability requirements. If you've got any questions about Wikipedia policy, feel free to ask on my talk page. —Tom Morris (talk) 22:42, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Tom! MetaGrrrl (talk) 22:49, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Great work on rewriting the article on Leslie Harpold and helping preserve the history of a pioneering woman creator on the web. —Tom Morris (talk) 22:15, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Your article about Leslie Harpold is very good. I have a sense of how much work it takes to write an article like that, and it would just get harder in the future as more links break, so I am glad to see it now. Thanks for writing it. Dreamyshade (talk) 23:09, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I really appreciate your help and I am learning from your improvements to the article. MetaGrrrl (talk) 23:21, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Leslie Harpold

On 7 January 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Leslie Harpold, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Leslie Harpold was an early influential blogger whose unexpected death raised the issue of digital estate planning for online creators? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Leslie Harpold. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Harrias ^talk 12:02, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chris Wetherell (February 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Samuell1616 was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chris Wetherell and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

One life to live (talk) 11:24, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chris Wetherell has been accepted

Chris Wetherell, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:29, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Fox Hills Country Club sign in mid-20th century.png

Thanks for uploading File:Fox Hills Country Club sign in mid-20th century.png, which you've attributed to Dinah Sanders. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:22, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This also applies to File:76 gas station with tower sign in Southern California circa 1930s.png. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:22, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Diannaa! Both now updated with links to my blog where I announced these gifted to the public domain. MetaGrrrl (talk) 19:15, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pacific Union Club Punch for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pacific Union Club Punch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pacific Union Club Punch until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

casualdejekyll 19:15, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]