User talk:Monniasza

Stop adding excessive, nonsensical links to articles

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.—J. M. (talk) 12:01, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:For adults

A tag has been placed on Template:For adults requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. • Gene93k (talk) 22:31, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipeid

A tag has been placed on Wikipeid requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —J. M. (talk) 12:48, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Battle of Bladensburg has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Battle of Bladensburg. Thanks! CNMall41 (talk) 05:10, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Hello, I'm LiberatorG. An edit that you recently made to Murder seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! LiberatorG (talk) 08:50, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

I wanted to let you know that your signature does not conform to the guidelines at WP:SIG. In particular, it shouldn't be a table that spans multiple lines. Please change it to something reasonable; thank you. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 21:45, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Monniasza I see that you changed your signature, but it's still a problem. You should not make a multi-line signature. Aside from taking up excessive vertical space, it will cause accessibility difficulties in discussions due to LISTGAP issues. I also strongly suggest that you include "Monniasza" in the signature. Your current sig doesn't actually show your name. I think this is what you want, all on one line:

[[User:Monniasza|Monniasza]] [[User talk:Monniasza|talk]] [[Special:Contributions/Monniasza|edits]]

Alsee (talk) 17:48, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Welcome, newcomers" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Welcome, newcomers. Since you had some involvement with the Welcome, newcomers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 17:08, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Possibly empty categories

A tag has been placed on Category:Possibly empty categories requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:02, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Monniasza! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 07:03, Saturday, August 31, 2019 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Pochea - CSD declined

Hi. I'm just letting you know that I m have declined your CSD on Pochea. This was not a COPYVIO. The content was a quotation from a cited source.

Please do not patrol new pages on the English Wikipedia until you have significantly more experience and can satisfy the requirements at WP:NPR and can apply for the user right. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:36, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Australia-Hungary" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Australia-Hungary. Since you had some involvement with the Australia-Hungary redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:06, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Novice users

A tag has been placed on Category:Novice users requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Steven (Editor) (talk) 01:31, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Monniasz,

It doesn't seem like your new creations of categories and redirects are having success. Perhaps you should edit existing articles and pages rather than creating pages which are subsequently deleted. If you have questions, please visit the Teahouse. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:19, 20 September 2019 (UTC)@Liz: Category is redirected. Monniasza talk 04:21, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 23:14, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Monniasza (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please reduce the block to following namespaces: mainspace, templates, metapages and help pages, because I haven't been disruptive on talk pages.
I may have been blocked, because I have misunderstood page review for template approval, as in the "uw pos" template.
I'm going to discuss improvements before full unblock. Evidence:
Oversight warning template logs, released
Oversight warning template logs, in sandbox Monniasza talk 16:04, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That is not technically possible at this time, and even if it were, if you cannot be trusted to edit certain namespaces, how can you be trusted to edit the rest of the project? I am declining your request.331dot (talk) 01:10, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Monniasza (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@331dot and Bbb23:I may have been blocked, because I have misunderstood page review for template approval, as in the "uw pos" template.
I'm going to discuss improvements to pages, policies and templates. Evidence:
Oversight warning template logs, released
Oversight warning template logs, in sandbox Monniasza talk 08:15, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That's what you said above, and it was not sufficient. Please read the guide to appealing blocks before requesting unblock again. Repeating yourself may result in losing the ability to edit this page. SQL ^{Query me!} 21:36, 1 November 2019 (UTC) SQL ^{Query me!} 21:36, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"Wiipedis" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wiipedis. Since you had some involvement with the Wiipedis redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — Searingjet // talk // contribs 14:03, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Bladensburg

Hello, Monniasza. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of Bladensburg".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 10:54, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Aiplane" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Aiplane has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 23 § Aiplane until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 22:11, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]