User talk:Nagara373

Chris Christoffersen

born: June 13, 1979

height: 218cm (7'2)

weight: 136kg (300lbs)

nationality: Denmark

Hello Nagara373, and welcome to Wikipedia! Here are some recommended guidelines to help you get involved. Please feel free to contact me if you need help with anything. Best of luck and happy editing! Mgm\|^(talk) 11:50, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects
Getting your info out there
Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Policy Library

Getting help
New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions
Getting along
Wikipedians Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Conflict resolution
Getting technical
Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

- Mgm|^(talk) 11:50, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Christoffersen

Hello! Chris Christoffersen is not the appropriate spot to post information about yourself, because that's the encyclopedic part of the Wikipedia website. User:Nagara373, however, is all yours to use more or less as you wish. Please see Wikipedia:Introduction and Wikipedia:User page for more information. TigerShark 09:24, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently created the article Chris Christoffersen. This was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate the article: if you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a review at Wikipedia:Deletion review. TigerShark 09:41, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop recreating this article. If you feel that it should not have deleted, please follow the process mentioned above. If you keep recreating this article, without following the correct process, you may be blocked from editing. Thanks TigerShark 10:39, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Andy van Volkenburgh

You have recently created the article Andy van Volkenburgh. This was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate the article: if you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a review at Wikipedia:Deletion review. TigerShark 13:00, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For the original deletion discussion, please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy van Volkenburgh. Thanks TigerShark 13:01, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Joachim Johansson (bodybuilder)

Nagara373, you'd do well to check the biography guidlines for living people as articles like this usually get speedily deleted. If you disagree please follow the instructions on the page - 10:11, 12 June 2006 (UTC)~

Jonas Lundberg

Hi.

You need to give evidence of why this person is notable, before you remove the tag from the article.

At the moment, you've not achieved that. Dweller 10:22, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - Peripitus (Talk) 10:23, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ignoring messages from other editors and persistently deleting tags is going to get you into trouble with the admins. Is it really worth it? Dweller 10:32, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dweller 10:45, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

(Persistently) removing tags is vandalism. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Dweller 12:23, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All I get for Joachim Johansson online is information about the tennis player. Please provide some reputable sources that proof this body builder exists. - Mgm|^(talk) 12:43, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bryant Reeves

Please see WP:NOR: Wikipedia does not allow original research - what you inserted does not seem to be accompanied by any references. Please do not reinsert your material unless you can find credible sources that support your claim. 18:01, 18 June 2006 (UTC) Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Bryant Reeves. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. -- Omicronpersei8 18:39, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Kaman

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.--203.214.105.113 09:40, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You did it again (under your IP address). Please don't do it. --203.214.105.113 10:28, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shawn Bradley

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.--203.214.105.113 09:40, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ectomorphic

Your additions to the Ectomorphic were directly copied from this website. Please remember that websites are copyrighted unless otherwise stated and that copying such information is not allowed. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:40, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Kaman

Please stop adding that information. His shoe size is mentioned because he's a basketball player, but his eye and hair color are not encyclopedic. Also, the number of DVds he owns his not verifiable. As for those see also links you keep adding, they are not relevant to the player himself. Only keep see also links to a bare minimum. Please read for the policy on these links: Wikipedia:See also. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:48, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, are you reading these messages? You don't appear to be heeding the advice. STOP ADDING THOSE LINKS, PLEASE! (thanks, if you understand) --203.214.105.113 12:19, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blond

Please stop adding irrelevant information and a nonexistant category to Blond. User:Angr 09:41, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You've been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for adding copyrighted and irrelevant material to articles. You're welcome to contribute constructively after the block expires. Remember that Wikipedia is a shared effort. If you don't agree, don't just put it back again and again, but engage in conversation. Most of the people who've been telling you to stop have been on Wikipedia a lot longer than you have, so they know what rules and policies apply. Please take some time to read a few pages of the welcome message above. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:26, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jay Cutler

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Yankees76 19:26, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dedric Fuchs

You have recently re-created the article Dedric Fuchs. This was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article: if you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a review at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Danny Lilithborne 10:26, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:1030191964 l.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1030191964 l.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:04, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:1164331040 l.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1164331040 l.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:04, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Estrogen. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

I see you've already done other vandalism edits.. don't or you'll get level 3 warnings. That was a level 2. --anger2headshot 09:08, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you asking questions about my appearance?

What are you asking about my hair and eye colour and my height for? RobbieG 16:43, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Defamation in Chris Kaman

Please stop. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did to Chris Kaman, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Darkspots 23:47, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Please don't mark edits as minor that add substantial content to articles in the mainspace. It makes it more difficult for other editors to see what you've added. You mark nearly every edit you make as minor, even ones adding sentences and paragraphs to articles. Please see WP:MINOR for more information about this. Darkspots 23:59, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sexual Harassment

I find this edit a bit disturbing in light of you making a number of edits along the lines of this. Sexual harassment of other editors is absolutely not permitted at Wikipedia. Anything further along these lines will almost certainly result in you being banned from this website. Darkspots 00:19, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Those questions have properly been removed and I have removed the information about who you're looking for from your userpage. Wikipedia is not a dating site. Please don't proposition other users or ask them about their personal lives. It's not appropriate.--Chaser - T 01:00, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Murphy

I have no problem with your creating articles for twin brothers named Ben Murphy and Brady Murphy, but please do not move other pages in order to free up the name you want to use without sufficient reasoning. The actor Ben Murphy, whose article you moved, is not known by the name Benjamin E. Murphy. Persons looking for that page would not particularly know to search for that name and when you do create the other article, it would be confusing. If the Ben and Brady Murphy you noted are related to this article, it would absolutely be inappropriate to move a notable actor to a more complicated title to make room for this. There should be a better way to disambiguate the page you've considered making than this. Thanks. Wildhartlivie (talk) 09:01, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Brenden Adams

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Brenden Adams requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Vejvančický (talk) 07:42, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dean Hanson

A tag has been placed on Dean Hanson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Favonian (talk) 08:55, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Paul Sturgess

A tag has been placed on Paul Sturgess requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Favonian (talk) 09:21, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Moving articles

Hello, Nagara373. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at WP:ANI#Ill-considered article moves regarding your repeated moves of biographical articles to names under which the persons are not commonly known. The discussion is about the topic Paul Sturgess. Thank you. --Favonian (talk) 10:08, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. --Vejvančický (talk) 10:12, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves

If you want to make a new page on someone who has a name identical to a name that is already on Wikipedia, do not move the old page to make a new one. Instead, make a new page with what the person is in parentheses after the name.

You should not have moved Paul Sturgess the footballer so you could make a page on Paul Sturgess the basketball player. Or Ben Murphy the actor for one of the twins "Ben and Brady Murphy". If you make these moves again, you will very likely be blocked from Wikipedia.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 10:27, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lamborghini

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Lamborghini, you will be blocked from editing. Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 10:33, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notification

Hello, Nagara373. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Basket of Puppies 16:00, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In follow-up to the above, please also see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#2nd opinion requested re Nagara373. EyeSerene^talk 18:52, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Editors at ANI are suggesting that you may have deliberately added wrong information to articles, as when you asserted that Lamborghini is the parent company of Koenigsegg. You seem knowledgable about cars, so why would put in something that is wrong? If your action was deliberate, it would be quite serious, so it's to your advantage to respond to the ANI complaint. EdJohnston (talk) 21:03, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinitely blocked

Per the above ANI thread detailing some long-term issues with your editing, I have blocked your account. Note that "indefinitely" does not necessarily mean "permanently". Your non-responsiveness to other editors' concerns is a large part of the issue, and we would be interested in hearing your explanation for the issues raised. You can still edit this talkpage, and I have it watchlisted (as, I'm sure, have others). If you want to formally request an unblock, you can use the {{unblock}} template (instructions on that page). EyeSerene^talk 10:32, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nagara373 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm still blocked. Nagara373 (talk) 09:21, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

How observant. To be unblocked, see below, and above. Specifically, we'd appreciate a response to the concerns that were raised back in November. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 03:04, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You need to request unblock right here, following the instructions provided above. See WP:GAB (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:05, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've refactored your unblock request slightly. Please note that it's generally a good idea to explain why you feel you should be unblocked (reading Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks might help). – Luna Santin (talk) 02:03, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nagara373 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

You have not given any reason why you should be unblocked. You need only make one unblock request, but it needs to make clear that you understand why you were blocked, and that you will not continue with the behaviour that led to the block. Read the Guide to appealing blocks first. JohnCD (talk) 10:22, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nagara373 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I cannot edit any articles or discussions

Decline reason:

I'll be a bit more clear on this matter i guess. If your blocked you can not edit any page whatsoever. Your block is currently indefinite, which means permanent unless changed. Using unblock request is the correct way to deal with this, but you need to address the reason why you were blocked and explain why it isn't valid, or why it doesn't apply any more. In other words, we need a reason to unblock you, or, to put it bluntly, a reason to allow you to edit. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 10:59, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am still blocked. Should I be retired? Nagara373 (talk) 09:33, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]