User talk:Patiencebako

Welcome!

Hello, Patiencebako, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Ashionye Ogene, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Fram (talk) 15:32, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ashionye Ogene

The article Ashionye Ogene has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks notability, no independent, reliable sources are actually about him and not either by him (or his part-time employer) or mentioning him.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 15:32, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ashionye Ogene for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ashionye Ogene is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashionye Ogene until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fram (talk) 16:31, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Ashionye Ogene, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:01, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ashionye Ogene, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Do not remove content from the page, as an article for deletion will do that for you if it passes. JMVR1 🗪 🖉 📫 16:48, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fidelis Duker

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fidelis Duker, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:33, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Obaji Akpet moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Obaji Akpet, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) In addition, there appears to be a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:39, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chukwuma Frank Ibezim

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chukwuma Frank Ibezim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://theparadise.ng/who-is-chukwuma-frank-ibezim/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Celestina007 (talk) 21:41, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Obaji Akpet

Hello, Patiencebako. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Obaji Akpet, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Agiriye Monima Harry

Hello, Patiencebako. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Agiriye Monima Harry, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Agiriye Monima Harry

Hello, Patiencebako. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Agiriye Monima Harry".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:35, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Agiriye Monima Harry

Hello, Patiencebako. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Agiriye Monima Harry".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:45, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Niran Adedokun moved to draftspace

Thanks for creating Niran Adedokun. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 15:27, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Niran Adedokun moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Niran Adedokun, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:47, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha Morgan Capital moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Alpha Morgan Capital, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 23:22, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please note, all of your current sources sound like press releases. WP:GNG is much stricter. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 23:24, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alpha Morgan Capital for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alpha Morgan Capital is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alpha Morgan Capital until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 10:32, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The page has been improved and promotional elements deleted. For notability, this company is a notable company in Nigeria that I feel is worth writing an article about. I will see to it that I will constantly continue to research to improve the article as well, even as it continues to be work in progress. Patiencebako (talk) 03:20, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bendancer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bendancer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bendancer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oaktree b (talk) 00:13, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Bendancer, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:04, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Patiencebako. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 10:53, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dreamy Jazz,

I noticed you slammed a block Sockpuppet investigation against me on Wikipedia, which I consider as an opportunity for improvement. Can you shed more light on what exactly is the issue as it will help me improve on my articles in the future.

I appreciate. Patiencebako (talk) 03:28, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Using multiple accounts on the same page without disclosure is against policy. You have been blocked because you did this on Alpha Morgan Capital in a way which seemed to promote the company. You have also continued to abuse multiple accounts by evading the block on this account. If you create more accounts they will be blocked and your contributions reverted as block evasion. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 09:45, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to provide this feedback and point me to this issue. I admit I have multiple accounts on Wikipedia, most of which I created while still trying to understand the platform and have been using simultaneously. I apologize for this and will stop using multiple accounts from now on. I am still work-in-progress and happy you have provided me an opportunity to learn.

Warm regards

~~~~ Patiencebako (talk) 04:14, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, may ask if everything is now fine and how this blocking can be reversed?

~~~~ Patiencebako (talk) 04:17, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Patiencebako (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I edit on Wikipedia as Patiencebako my was recently blocked as sockpuppet and I am writing to appeal to be unblocked.

I joined the Wikipedia contributors family to volunteer my contribution to articles I feel were worth being published for research and information purposes. I felt there are many underserved articles about people and things in Nigeria and Africa of notability worthy of being read about; I have either edited or contributed new articles on Wikipedia as my own contribution to the community, and I have been taking out time out of my busy work schedule to do this consistently for years now.

While I acknowledge some shortfalls that may happen occasionally as I am also working in progress learning my way through making this contribution in a way that meets best practice I feel it is unfair to block me, but call my attention and point to any errors that I may have erroneously made on the platform. Hence, this appeal for my immediate unblocking.

As I look forward to this reversal, I appreciate the community Wikipedia has established over time, united for an informed and educated society and remain committed to the community tenets.

Thank you and kind regards Patiencebako (talk) 04:21, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The typical thing we ask for in this situation is for the user to go six months without editing under any account or IP, to demonstrate that they can abide by guidelines. I see no reason to not ask for that here. 331dot (talk) 08:24, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have fixed the formatting of the request. Another administrator should be around shortly to review your request. To non-CU admins, feel free to ping me to ask for the removal of the "checkuser block" part of this block so it can be processed like a normal unblock. If you have questions for me specifically, you can use the template {{ping}} to send me a notification. Otherwise I might not notice your message. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 22:45, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]