User talk:PauloHelene
A tag has been placed on Spin Jet, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Brusegadi (talk) 06:28, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Spin Jet
[edit]I have nominated Spin Jet, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spin Jet. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Brusegadi (talk) 16:30, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:PPCPPM1.JPG
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:PPCPPM1.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:44, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Egmodel.JPG
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Egmodel.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:40, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:AbcMOR.JPG
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:AbcMOR.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:50, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:DPPLPP1.JPG
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:DPPLPP1.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:42, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of C40 Large Cities Climate Summit SEOUL, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.c40cities.org/news/news-20090522.jsp. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:53, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Copyright problems with C40 Large Cities Climate Summit SEOUL
[edit]Hello. Concerning your contribution, C40 Large Cities Climate Summit SEOUL, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.c40cities.org/news/news-20090522.jsp. As a copyright violation, C40 Large Cities Climate Summit SEOUL appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. C40 Large Cities Climate Summit SEOUL has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:C40 Large Cities Climate Summit SEOUL and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and CC-BY-SA, under CC-BY-SA, or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:C40 Large Cities Climate Summit SEOUL with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:C40 Large Cities Climate Summit SEOUL.
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Jujutacular talk 14:22, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Welcome
[edit]
|
Planet hypothesis of the moon
[edit]This page has been deleted. The deletion and move log for the page are provided below for reference.
15:28, 26 October 2009 Ged UK (talk | contribs) deleted "Planet hypothesis of the moon" (G1: Patent nonsense, meaningless, or incomprehensible)
Dealing with patent nonsense
[edit]There are various ways to deal with total nonsense—use your good judgment to decide which is most appropriate:
- Replace it with brilliant prose.
-> Who will do this as a native speaker scientist?
- Move it to the article's talk page.
- Move it to the user's talk page.
- Remove it from the article if there is anything left in the article after that.
However, if anybody objects, because they believe that the content is not total nonsense, then it is best to discuss the issue with them and to try to reach a consensus. In particular, if someone says that they think they can rework the "nonsense" into something worthwhile, then please give them some time and space to do so.
If an article contains nothing but patent nonsense, use your good judgment to decide whether to:
- list it on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion
- delete it straight away (only if you are an administrator)
- add the tag {{db-g1}} or one of its alternative names {{nonsense}} and {{db-nonsense}}, which automatically lists it on Category:Candidates for speedy deletion
- nominate the article for Wikipedia:Proposed Deletion with the {{prod}} tag if the article is uncontroversial, but nonetheless merits review.
No
[edit]- appears to be a joke; doesn't discuss a WMF issue and isn't a proposal. user:Tempodivalse
- 15:28, 26 October 2009 Ged UK (talk | contribs) : "Planet hypothesis of the moon" (G1: Patent nonsense, meaningless, or incomprehensible)
Yes
[edit]The Moon is very very dense and the Earth moves around the moon.
Planet Hypothesis of Moon
[edit]The Rotation period of the Moon is about 28 days which is appropriate value between those of Mars and Venus.
Moon is nearer to earth when it is full . That is to say, moon make earth reced more than earth make when it is near the sun.
See also
[edit]- Hollow earth
- Galileo Galilei
- And yet it moves (E pur si muove!)
- Proposal:High speed jet engine
- WMF issue : Where to go for growth :And yet it moves around moon
- Patent:Rocket engine aparatus making high speed jet
Speedy deletion nomination of Planet hypothesis of the moon
[edit]A tag has been placed on Planet hypothesis of the moon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 02:58, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
CfD nomination of Category:SHG
[edit]I have nominated Category:SHG (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Second-harmonic generation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:15, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:PauloHelene
[edit]User:PauloHelene, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:PauloHelene and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:PauloHelene during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ScienceApologist (talk) 17:20, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
File source problem with File:TPPEPPM1.JPG
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:TPPEPPM1.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:04, 20 October 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 11:04, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
File:TPPEPPM1.JPG listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TPPEPPM1.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 03:20, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Category:Kosala
[edit]Category:Kosala, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Redtigerxyz Talk 20:08, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Category:Yaksha Kingdom has been nominated for deletion
[edit]Category:Yaksha Kingdom has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Redtigerxyz Talk 12:42, 18 July 2021 (UTC)