User talk:PleaseConsider

Welcome!

Hello, PleaseConsider! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:59, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Talkback

Hello, PleaseConsider. You have new messages at Talk:List of wars involving the United States.
Message added 02:01, 29 December 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

SantiLak (talk) 02:01, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, PleaseConsider. You have new messages at Talk:List of wars involving the United States.
Message added 02:20, 29 December 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

SantiLak (talk) 02:20, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at List of wars involving the United States

Hello PleaseConsider. It looks like a new edit war has broken out on this article. This time around, I think the main responsibility for the war falls on you. I haven't found anyone on the talk page who supports any of your recent changes. Continuation of your recent reverts might be seen as disruptive editing. In your short time on Wikipedia you've already been blocked twice. Please consider the wisdom of opening a discussion on the talk page about your desired changes. If you find consensus there, then you can go ahead and make your changes. If you won't do that, a block may be issued with no further warning. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 04:06, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Singles on .5: The Gray Chapter

Prove it. So far I've found nothing but promo videos with possible cover art. It has been removed until proof is shown; do not change until you can source respective singles. DannyMusicEditor (talk) 20:52, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Their is no proof to be shown. We use sources here on the wiki. And these singles were released separately and individually. And what do you mean "possible cover art"? The artwork is what Slipknot put in themselves. - PleaseConsider (talk)

I doubt they were released individually. Show me. DannyMusicEditor (talk) 04:13, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And even if they did get an individual release they were not official singles they were promos so they should not be listed. DannyMusicEditor (talk) 04:15, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No one here cares about your opinion. And do you not see the dates that the video were uploaded? Instead of wasting my time why don't you click the videos yourself, and see for yourself? Im not gonna keep telling you. Singles are singles. Enough said. - User:PleaseConsider (talk)

Stop using the "show me proof" as a way to defense to keep it your way. It doesn't work like that here.

That's the thing. It DOES work like that here (partially). The thing about promos and video singles isn't opinion. I learned that from trying to list them myself. They can have their own article provided they have standard notability, but they don't go in the singles list. If they did, The Hunting Party would have "Wastelands" in the singles list. Now I know LP has nothing to do with Slipknot, but still, the LP album article series make good models. How we got away with adding them on .5 for so long is unknown to me. (And I used the "Sarcastrophe" video to follow your example - nothing giving away a true single. If it was a true single it'd be sold in stores/online for profit, aside from buying it as a part of an album.) DannyMusicEditor (talk) 23:17, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The thing is that they WERE sold online. Spotfiy and iTunes made them available as soon as they were uploaded. And I cant use Spotify and iTunes links as resources. So I can't show you. This already common fact. Singles like Disasterpiece Live were not sold in stores or anywhere for that matter. It was a promo single and its still considered a single. Either we come to an agreement now or Ill move this to the article.

War in Afghanistan rename

Just wanted to let you know. Despite the rename proposal going through with a 100% consensus, editor RightCowLeftCoast has jumped in again within a day of the discussion being closed and the article renamed and has requested the article name be returned to before and plus merge the 2015-present article into the 2001 one. Your arguments and opinion from before would be appreciated once again at the talk page. Cheers! EkoGraf (talk) 14:18, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Be careful, the wording of this message sounds kind of like canvassing. -SantiLak (talk) 21:37, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Im with SantiLak on this one. - User:PleaseConsider (talk) 10:59, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Hello, I'm Excirial. I noticed that you recently removed some content from List of wars and battles involving the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 20:57, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 8 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Gilroy High School page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Hello, I'm Bamyers99. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. --Bamyers99 (talk) 02:00, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 09:20, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Winklevoss twins. Serols (talk) 14:53, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, PleaseConsider. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at 6ix9ine, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. This edit is unacceptable. Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:39, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. AustralianRupert (talk) 08:54, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 09:55, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]