User talk:Power22

Potzdam 1723 Musket

Potzdam 1723 Musket was the early modern period Musket of Prussian Empire which was comparable in role to Charleville of France & Brown Bess of Britain.

Potzdam Musket 1723

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Potzdam Musket 1723, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.militaryheritage.com/musket19.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:48, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Potzdam Musket 1723

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Potzdam Musket 1723 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.militaryheritage.com/musket19.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. →εϻαdιν ^ΤαΙk _{Ͼδητrιβμτιoης} 12:48, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Potzdam Musket 1723. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. →εϻαdιν ^ΤαΙk _{Ͼδητrιβμτιoης} 15:09, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kraftway

Hello Power22,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kraftway for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 06:58, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Koos bekker.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Koos bekker.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Christoffel Wiese, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shoprite. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Hello, I'm Kharkiv07. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to List of Pakistanis by net worth because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Kharkiv07 ^Talk 00:29, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Cape Germans has been reverted, as it removed all content from the page without explanation. Please do not do this, as it is considered vandalism; instead, use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see here for what to do. Thank you. Amaury (talk) 05:41, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Media24, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tuis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jahanzeb College Swat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swat. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Miandam

Thanks for cleaning up Miandam! --M @r ē ino 15:38, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

Hello. While listing the regional languages of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, it is important to list all the indigenous regional languages too. Please do not remove all indigenous regional languages. If however a mistake has been made that you feel can be correct, feel free to remove individual languages that are not spoken regionally in the province. Thank you. Khestwol (talk) 16:46, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pashtun related articles

hi please note a user Rashid zaman and his sock puppets account who are continously changing the facts in Pashtun related articles.One of his sock puppets user:Maria0333 (who is now blocked on enWP) has uploaded maps to commons wikimedia which are baseless and based on his Punjabi Mindset. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.108.129.48 (talk) 05:01, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bashigram Lake

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Bashigram Lake, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.valleyswat.net/tourism/bashigram.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:04, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Moving articles

Hi just a note that you moved Wikipedia:Sakhaneftegaz to the wrong location. The "Wikipedia:" namespace is for articles pertaining to the editing of Wikipedia. Articles themselves go in the "(article)" namespace. Additionally, you should first look at the article to make sure it does not meet a criteria for speedy deletion. Happy editing. Opencooper (talk) 05:15, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I

This message is to inform you that a thread about your editing has been opened here Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Reporting extremely abusive summary line by Power22. MarnetteD|Talk 16:08, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for attacking other users. This edit summary, which has now been hidden (but I'm sure you can remember it) was completely unacceptable. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 20:33, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There was a word in your edit summary that I didn't understand; now I have informed myself, and in consequence I'm raising the block to one week. You haven't been blocked before, I presume because you haven't behaved like that before. Don't do it again. Bishonen | talk 20:59, 1 March 2016 (UTC).[reply]

@Bishonen: after you blocked this user escaped the block using following IPs [1] [2] [3]. First edit by IP number one was with in 72 hours blocage. Second IP did same edit and used same edit summary. Third IP did same edit and confessed that he edit war on Khyber pakhtunkhwa article [4] ¬¬¬¬

March 2016

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Adilswati. Thank you. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 20:48, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 22:37, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Power22. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Motyginskaya hydroelectric power plant

The article Motyginskaya hydroelectric power plant has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable proposed local power station. I see no evidence it was ever built.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 20:21, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Evenk hydroelectric power plant for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Evenk hydroelectric power plant is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evenk hydroelectric power plant until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chidgk1 (talk) 09:37, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]