User talk:Ramrancher8

Hi Ramrancher8! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

03:30, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

Hello, I'm STATicVapor. I noticed that you recently removed content from Major League Wrestling without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. StaticVapor message me! 05:21, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lucha Libre AAA Worldwide, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. StaticVapor message me! 07:24, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Ring of Honor. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. StaticVapor message me! 17:21, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at People Nation. SummerPhD^v2.0 19:05, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:21, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ramrancher8, I saw that you made this edit without adding an edit summary or citing a reference. I also noticed that you've been repeatedly warned by other users for adding unsourced content to Wikipedia. This is why you've been blocked for 36 hours. However, if you want to appeal your block and create an unblock request, and you promise to be more careful, review the policy, and cite sources when needed, I'll accept your unblock with the condition that this doesn't continue. :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:23, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

War of the Worlds (2019) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, War of the Worlds (2019), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:30, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on 2019 in professional wrestling. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. StaticVapor message me! 23:34, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ROH Mass Hysteria

Hello Ramrancher8,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged ROH Mass Hysteria for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

QueerEcofeminist^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 12:55, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ROH Mass Hysteria moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, ROH Mass Hysteria, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 06:05, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at State of the Art (2019). StaticVapor message me! 22:00, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Quest (2019) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Royal Quest (2019), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:34, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Southern Showdown moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Southern Showdown, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:35, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced edits

Alright Ramrancher8, so I have noticed that most of the time when you add new content, you do not add a reliable source for you additions. We have a policy on verifiability<------- click that link. Any content added needs to be able to verified by vandalism patrolers now and editors in the future. Without a citation how do we not know you are making things up? Please refer to these links:

I appreciate your efforts in editing wrestling articles. However, if you do not bother listening to this message, I will open a WP:ANI, where you face being blocked now and in the future. StaticVapor message me! 07:00, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Championship Wrestling from Hollywood. StaticVapor message me! 05:37, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Watch Dogs

Template:Watch Dogs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 18:40, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 22:16, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your block has been lifted early. A complaint made against you cited as evidence a particular addition by you, but on closer examination that turned out to be one of two edits in which you cut unsourced material from one paragraph and re-added it elsewhere in the article.

I have not examined your other edits. If other evidence is presented which was to show that you have been editing in breach of Wikipedia's policies, then you could be blocked again.

However, right now, on behalf of the admin corps I apologise for this unsatisfactory sanction taken against you. – Fayenatic London 07:32, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Someone has left a note on my talk page listing other edits of yours that are open to criticism. You certainly need to start using the edit summary; see Help:Edit summary. – Fayenatic London 22:11, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Summer Supercard. StaticVapor message me! 22:47, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:02, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Global Wars Espectacular, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Singles match (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:07, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Hello, I'm Larry Hockett. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mexican Americans, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Larry Hockett (Talk) 03:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Globe Theatre (Los Angeles) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Globe Theatre (Los Angeles), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:04, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Fighting Spirit Unleashed (2019). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. StaticVapor message me! 23:18, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Honor United (2019). StaticVapor message me! 05:27, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. JGHowes ^talk 01:40, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ramrancher8. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. ST47 (talk) 05:27, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:ROH Mass Hysteria concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:ROH Mass Hysteria, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:War of the Worlds (2019)

Hello, Ramrancher8. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "War of the Worlds".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 09:14, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Royal Quest (2019)

Hello, Ramrancher8. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Royal Quest".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 01:02, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Globe Theatre (Los Angeles) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Globe Theatre (Los Angeles), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:ROH Mass Hysteria concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:ROH Mass Hysteria, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:ROH Mass Hysteria

Hello, Ramrancher8. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ROH Mass Hysteria".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:07, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Best In The World (2019" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Best In The World (2019 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 20 § Best In The World (2019 until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:46, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]