User talk:Ravinder3790

Welcome!

Hello, Ravinder3790, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JohnCD (talk) 10:21, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Find it EZ

I have moved the page to correct the company name, and restored the AFC header templates, which should not have been removed. To submit it for review with a view to moving to article space, click the blue "Submit" button. JohnCD (talk) 10:21, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Ravinder3790, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia. If you need assistance, check out the Getting Help section below or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~), which will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please always fill in the edit summary field to describe your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Cordially, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:14, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Wikipedia's five pillars • A tutorial • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments • Help desk • Teahouse • Help directory Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources • Topic notability What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • List of guidelines • Three-revert rule • Copyrights Image use policy • Policy for non-free content • Deletion policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Conflict of interest • Sock puppetry

Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation The perfect article • Peer review • Featured content
The community
Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette Build consensus • Resolve disputes • No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump • Signpost • IRC channels
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages • Portals Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts Awards that registered contributors can achieve and award

Proposed deletion of Vaibhav Gehlot

Hello, Ravinder3790,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Vaibhav Gehlot, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:03, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi onel5969, I created the Page due to two major reasons. 1- This personality belongs to the family of politicians i.e. Ashok Gehlot who is the current Rajasthan CM. 2- He is supposed to contest Lok Sabha Election 2019 from Sawai Madhopur seat. So, I think he is going to be the next big search in the coming months. Rest, I appreciate your efforts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2401:4900:310B:A6E7:523:97FC:1336:8207 (talk) 14:17, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with your custom signature

You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. 19:04, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

I've made the appropriate changes. Thanks! 00:39, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Find it EZ for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Find it EZ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Find it EZ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Teratix ₵ 02:29, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1][2][3][4] MrOllie (talk) 13:32, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 14:13, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ravinder3790 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I am blocked due to spam activity. And my attempt to make a wiki page for public figure is considered as a spam. If you check the page I recommend on Wikipedia, is enriched with authentic and legit references. Even in the past, I have created pages for public figures. In all I have followed complete Wikipedia guidelines and accepted any corrections needed from the admin end . As per current page of ARCHANA SURANA is concerned, I recommended her page as she is a female public figure who has numerous recognition in her life and is an importation model for female across the country. Hence I appeal for unblock with the note that no spam is made that spoil or affect the quality and authenticity of Wikipedia database Ravinder Singh Tanwar (talk) 00:23, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address your violation of WP:COI and WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 07:09, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ravinder3790 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi MER-C. Since day 1 I have only Tried my best to add quality information on the Wikipedia platform to nurture the existing resources. I have even created a few pages in the past that were all a public figure. I only put my efforts on Wikipedia if I am sure about the authenticity of a resource and genuineness of any public figure. So I request to takedown the block request and allow me to keep the Wikipedia informative and clean. Ravinder Singh Tanwar (talk) 03:09, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:15, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi Yamla, I am blocked due to spam activity. And my attempt to make a wiki page for public figure is considered as a spam. If you check the page I recommend on Wikipedia, is enriched with authentic and legit references. Even in the past, I have created pages for public figures. In all I have followed complete Wikipedia guidelines and accepted any corrections needed from the admin end . As per current page of ARCHANA SURANA is concerned, I recommended her page as she is a female public figure who has numerous recognitions in her life and is an importation model for female across the country.

Hence I appeal for unblock with the note that no spam is made that spoil or affect the quality and authenticity of Wikipedia database . Ravinder Singh Tanwar (talk) 11:23, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=Hi, I am blocked due to spam activity. And my attempt to make a wiki page for public figure is considered as a spam. If you check the page I recommend on Wikipedia, is enriched with authentic and legit references. Even in the past, I have created pages for public figures. In all I have followed complete Wikipedia guidelines and accepted any corrections needed from the admin end . As per current page of ARCHANA SURANA is concerned, I recommended her page as she is a female public figure who has numerous recognition in her life and is an importation model for female across the country. Hence I appeal for unblock with the note that no spam is made that spoil or affect the quality and authenticity of Wikipedia database}}

Ravinder Singh Tanwar (talk) 00:23, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=I know you have blocked my account due to advertising or promotion.  However, I have never used Wikipedia as a means of advertising any specific brand or public figure. I only read about the people across the country and approached Wikipedia only if I found the public figure is in search and is popular among the people. 
:Since 2014, I have only worked on Wikipedia to boost its authenticity and knowledge base, without using it as a means of advertising or promotion. So, I request you to unblock my account.}}

Ravinder Singh Tanwar (talk) 08:16, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ravinder3790 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi Admin, Please reconsider my request to unblock my Account. I know you have blocked my account due to advertising or promotion. However, I have never used Wikipedia as a means of advertising any specific brand or public figure. I only read about the people across the country and approached Wikipedia only if I found the public figure is in search and is popular among the people. Since 2014, I have only worked on Wikipedia to boost its authenticity and knowledge base, without using it as a means of advertising or promotion. So, I request you to unblock my account.

Decline reason:

I have deactivated a duplicate unblock request that you made above (the first of the two was deactivated from the beginning). Please do not open multiple unblock requests at a time.

It seems quite clear to me that you were in fact using Wikipedia for advertising, and I don't find your explanation credible. As such, I am declining this request. --Blablubbs (talk) 19:57, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ravinder Singh Tanwar (talk) 11:46, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Archana Surana

Hello, Ravinder3790. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Archana Surana, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to email

I do not consider unblock requests sent via email, as clearly stated on the email form. Please do not email me again. MER-C 11:42, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]