- 1 Welcome
- 2 Image Tagging for Image:Gaenselieselbrunnen.jpg
- 3 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Acp cover.jpg
- 4 Thermodynamik chemischer Vorgänge
- 5 Volume concentration/fraction
- 6 Orphaned non-free image File:Acp cover.jpg
- 7 Henry′s law
- 8 Happy New Year
- 9 Isotopic atmospheric chemistry
- 10 Disambiguation link notification for July 13
- 11 Osmolarity vs osmolar concentration
- 12 Raoult's law
- 13 Disambiguation link notification for November 4
- 14 Eponymous theory
- 15 Persistence of percent concentration
- 16 Disambiguation link notification for June 4
- 17 Indexes
- 18 Rollback
- 19 Managing a conflict of interest
- 20 ArbCom elections are now open!
- 21 ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Image Tagging for Image:Gaenselieselbrunnen.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gaenselieselbrunnen.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Acp cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Acp cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:20, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Apparently, you can buy it here:
Indeed, the IUPAC web page is the same for both. To me, only "volume fraction" seems to be well defined. In the absense of a proper definition of "volume concentration" I have to assume that it is exactly the same...--RolfSander (talk) 17:48, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
It also seems that for non-ideal mixtures like alcoholic ones the volume fraction is easy to calculate but difficult to measure due ton volume non-additivity while volume procent/concentration is easy to measure.(?)--MagnInd (talk) 23:14, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Acp cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Acp cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
What data are there concerning Henry′s law constants for gas solubilities in partial miscible multiphasic liquids? And how is the expression of the law in these situations? Is the constant additive? (consisting from contributions give by the solubilities in each of liquids and the partial miscibility domain). (of course taking activities into consideration when necessary).--MagnInd (talk) 17:10, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
- I'm sorry but I've only looked at Henry's law for aqueous solutions (I'm an atmospheric chemist: distribution between air and clouds). I cannot help you here--RolfSander (talk) 19:32, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Is the solubility of gas in aqueous solutions, say oxigen, influenced by presence of electrolytes comparatively to distiled water and how? Is the value of the constant from the law different or activity coefficient comes into play in this case?--MagnInd (talk) 21:12, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Solubiity of gases decreases with increasing salt concontration of the solution. To see how it is linked to Henry's law, I suggest you google "Sechenov equation" to find out more.--RolfSander (talk) 21:32, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the tip. Perhaps a redirect would be useful Sechenov equation and the article Henry law should be added infos concerning the influence of electrolytes found on google search.--MagnInd (talk) 12:21, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- If you want to add a Sechenov section to the Henry's law page, go ahead! I currently have too many things to do to start with this.--RolfSander (talk) 19:34, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Happy New Year
Isotopic atmospheric chemistry
- Deuterium (and other isotopes) are mainly used as a diagnostic tool:  --RolfSander (talk) 11:17, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Relative atomic mass, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Resolving power (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Osmolarity vs osmolar concentration
When there are several names, I always prefer the name that IUPAC recommends: , i.e. osmotic concentration. They say it was "formerly called osmolarity". A link to this goldbook page should probably be added to the article as well.--RolfSander (talk) 20:02, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
What is the exact statement of Raoult's law for aqueous electrolytes considering van't Hoff factor? It seems that there is a persistent erroneous statement neglecting electrolyte dissociation even in meteorology and atmospheric chemistry sources.--MagnInd (talk) 20:15, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vapor quality, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mass fraction (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Persistence of percent concentration
Regarding the persistence of the name percent concentration, how was mass fraction called when encountered it first time in the elementary textbook? Was it called mass fraction or percent concentration?--MagnInd (talk) 23:28, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eurocycle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Altenstadt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi, I noticed that you requested rollback right at WP:PERM. That right can only be used when the edit is obvious vandalism. The example you mentioned is not obvious vandalism because the user might be thinking that their edits are helpful to wikipedia. I want to tell you that there are other ways of reverting consecutive edits by same user. You can use Twinkle, it gives non rollbackers the ability to rollback, you can enable it in preferences. Another way is to edit the version, which is in good condition. You can see second method in detail here. Thank you Supdiop talk 10:16, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the hint! It worked, I don't need the rollback right anymore. RolfSander (talk) 11:48, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, RolfSander. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Geoscientific Model Development, you may have a conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:
- avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
- instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the
- avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
- exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 15:42, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)