User talk:Jonathan Groß

Welcome!

Hello, Jonathan Groß, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Bhadani 08:23, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Took you guys a lot of time to recognize me. No problem, I'm not quite active. Anyway, I would prefer not to receive ^ that automatic message. I know nobody typed it himself for me, exspecially for me, for if you, Bhadani, had read my User Page, you'd seen my German account and could have checked my edits there and found that I'm quite settled in WP. There may be some differences (like the Categorization or the Criteria for pertinence (de) but I think I didn't screw up anything yet, did I?

But thanks anyway for recognizing me. --Sarazyn 08:45, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Berlin meeting

To make this a little more personal: of course you're free to come around if you can make it at such short notice...but I think it is nothing like the Berliner Stammtisch of the German wikipedia :)) Lectonar 13:14, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Guess not. Have you already defined the differences? :) -- Sarazyn • TALK • DE 13:31, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We'll see...how much people will really turn up; no one has had much interaction with the other up to now; I made the invitations according to the category Wikipedians in Berlin. BTW, how did you get to the meeting page (just being curious here :)) And would you be so nice as to answer on my talk-page? Lectonar 13:39, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why on your talk page? I hate splitting discussions... there was some promotion on de:WP:T/B and I got curious... -- Sarazyn • TALK • DE 13:47, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's why: please respond on my talk-page so that my new message box lights up, as I will notice your message sooner. Thank you. And that's some kind of promotion. Hope you don't think I'm the devil incarnate. :)))) Lectonar 14:46, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Lectonar 14:54, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First of all: Thank you for the award/goodie; have a

WikiThanks

for that 2. I will move the User:Lectonar/Berlin Meeting page to WP:Meetup/Berlin; wolud you be so kind as to upload the picttures from commons to the page; I shall endeavour to write a summary and make a general fixup in the next days 3. Your "e.mail this user" function doesn't seem to work in en-wiki. Cheers. Lectonar 13:48, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I created a page on WM Commons: English Wikipedia Berlin Meetup. Is there any use for another gallery? -- Sarazyn • TALK • DE 14:19, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet photos ;). see you next time. ∴ here…♠ 15:07, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I hope May 21st Sarazyn • TALK • DE 21:15, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Rosetta Barnstar
		For your efforts translating English articles about Chinese history to German, you are awarded the Rosetta Barnstar. (It would have been awarded on the German Wikipedia except I can't seem to find any barnstars there...) --Nlu (talk) 15:09, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Map in Deutsch Wikipedia

You got Wei Xiao's position placed incorrectly -- his position was to the west of Chang'an, not to the northeast. --Nlu (talk) 14:17, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was following the desription in Emperor Guangwu of Han. That's a great example how useful maps are... Thx 4 your hint! Sarazyn • TALK • DE 14:17, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just funny

Have a look here. I think this is seriously funny. Lectonar 09:42, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, crap. I thought I could do that wacky thing to assure myself... Sarazyn • TALK • DE 10:52, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

fair use image on your userpage

I am concerned that you are using a fair use image on your userpage. The terms of the use of Image:Doctor Zoidberg.png prevent it from being used anywhere except the article in question, and particularly not on userpages. Please see Wikipedia:Fair use#Policy and Wikipedia:Removal of fair use images for more information. I'd ask that you please remove this yourself, as I do not wish to disturb your userpage/userboxes. -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 00:45, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How do you do?

I thought you might enjoy this...Cheers. Lectonar 08:54, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

h0h0h0, lovely ;), thanks. ∴ here…♠ 22:55, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user humbly begs the European Union to allow the U.S. state of Massachusetts to join.

This user prefers the cereal oat meal.

Wonderful user boxes

Saw your comment regarding permission to photograph Amish people. I left a comment there, It seems to be more an issue of politeness than legality. Not that manners can be over emphasized. But it is a much milder issue for the Amish, than several Oceania and Amazon peoples who believe their life, or their soul is being diminished or taken away when photographed.

But my primary reason for writing is to compliment you on your great user boxes. And herewith, a couple of mine. CApitol3

Thank you so much! As I recall, the Amish don't believe their souls can be captured by depiction, so you're right. Sarazyn • TALK • DE 01:03, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hello/translations

Hi Sarazyn

I'm also a German, but I translate from German wiki to English wiki. Somehow ended up here and less in the German wiki. I would like to ask you if we could cooperate on translations from time to time. My main topic is military history (yes, I'm a project member). Greatings Wandalstouring 17:02, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be honored :) Sarazyn • TALK • DE 09:19, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Jiang Wei

I don't know enough about the subject to be able to say whether these comments are "crap" or not, but I do know that whether stuff on a talk page is valid or correct is not a basis for deleting the talk page. Talk pages aren't held to the same standards of verifiability as articles. NawlinWiki 20:14, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your hint..

.. on NetObjects, Inc. page is much appreciated. --Peter Eisenburger 18:11, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Danke, sagt ex-Sarazyn Sarazyn • TALK • DE 18:18, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Chinese Warlords in 25 AD.jpg

Hi -- Deadkid dk (talk · contribs) added the image to the article Emperor Guangwu of Han, and I appreciate the map, but the location given for Wei Xiao in the map is wrong -- Wei's territory was to the west of Chang'an, not to the east. (It is just southeast of Dou Rong's.) Would you be able to change that? --Nlu (talk) 04:33, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Already changed it on some other guy's request... Please do it yourself, I fear that I would make it wrong again ;) Sarazyn • TALK • DE 23:57, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help with a translation

I translated this from german to English in the article Punic military forces, but I'm not sure whether this is the best possible translation, so I'm open to suggestions.

"The central problem (to understanding) the Carthaginian political institutions is their relation to military aspects"("Das zentrale Problem des karthagischen Staatslebens ist sein Verhältnis zum Militärwesen")

Greatings Wandalstouring 23:26, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deutsch version of Wang Mang

Hi, I don't know whether you or someone else created the family tree image file in de:Wang Mang, but it is not correct to the extent that it stated that the Princess Huanghuang was Emperor Gengshi of Han's wife. She was Emperor Ping of Han's wife. Can you look into this? Thanks. --Nlu (talk) 15:33, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dang, you're right. Gotta fix that sometime. Sarazyn • TALK • DE 15:37, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

wikiproject Three Kingdoms

Thanks again for your contribs to Battle of Red Cliffs. A few of us are trying to start a wikiproject Three Kingdoms, the "under construction" version of which is being discussed here and constructed here. You're welcome to join in, if you like... Thanks again! Ling.Nut 23:12, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invitation! I fairly contributed to the Three Kingdoms here (but I took advantage of your work here to build de:Category:Zeit der Drei Reiche on my own :) but now that I've settled with the matters I guess one day I'll optimize the minor character articles which are now stubs... I'd love to help you. Greetz, Sarazyn • 丁ALK • DE 07:32, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

project proposal

If interested in WikiProject Three Kingdoms, please add your name to the project proposal to show support. It may encourage others to join. Ling.Nut 19:19, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Red Cliffs

Hey Sarazyn... you left the comment "Undecided" about Battle of Red Cliffs on WP:GAC. As long as that comment is there, no one else will review the article. They will assume that you have taken responsibility for it... Thanks! Ling.Nut 00:43, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OMG! What do I do? I just wanted to point out my concern. Can you take care of that? Sarazyn • 丁ALK • DE 22:54, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(undent) Don't Panic. :-) I put it in WP:GA/R. That isn't standard procedure, but this isn't a standard case. Thanks! Ling.Nut 23:02, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use "undecided" as a GA review result. Pass/Fail/Hold are your options. Undecided would fall under Hold. These last for no less than two and no more than seven days (extensions can be granted under certain circumstances). Seven days is the typical hold period, however. A detailed list of issues found needs to be listed as well. Periodically check progress. Once issues have been addressed, promote the article. If they are not met within the hold period, fail the article. If you only have concerns that you want to point out without actually doing a review, just leave a message on the article talk page and leave the GA/N page alone so that another editor can take the review.

Regards, LaraLove ^T/_C 19:39, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, Sarazyn. I did it, not you, and it's not a big deal... Ling.Nut

Sun Jian

Okay, yeah thanks for reaching me in my talk page, edit warring is not the best move, so you did the right thing. Thanks.--EveryDayJoe45 14:46, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I was making refernce to Liu Bei specifically, because it sais "powerful warlord" on his page. --EveryDayJoe45 14:57, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, he was one of the three powerful warlords to survive the Han Dynasty, wasn't he? And being in charge of Shu & Hanzhong provided him with valuable power (see Zhuge Liang's Northern Expeditions). Sarazyn • 丁人LK • DE 17:49, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Little while no see

Hi Sarazyn, haven't bumped into you in a little while. Hope things are going well! Ling.Nut 00:40, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

please see

Please see this Ling.Nut 14:44, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, did that little hiccup with the GA nom of Battle of Red Cliffs make you uncomfortable? Sorry if I somehow stepped on your toes... Ling.Nut 22:39, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stub maintenance

Hello, Sarazyn. I noticed in your WP3K member description that you're thinking about doing some work on the multitude of stubs we have. If you're up to it, Liu Qi (Three Kingdoms) is a right mess. I've taken care of Liu Cong (Three Kingdoms), but I'm wrapped up in the VG project right now. This stub's all yours if you want it. Cheers. Gamer Junkie 09:20, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:AkiKimura99

This guy has awarded themself a barnstar and signed your name to it. Corvus cornix_talk 05:27, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He did? Really? Wow. This guy sucks! :) Sarazyn • 丁人LK • DE 09:52, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Germany Invitation

Hello, Sarazyn! I'd like to call your attention to the WikiProject Germany and the German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board. I hope their links, sub-projects and discussions are interesting and even helpful to you. If not, I hope that new ones will be.

--Zeitgespenst (talk) 21:09, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Meetup in Athens

Hello Jonathan. I am aware of the meetup though it is highly likely that i won't be in Athens on the 31st of March. I also saw the proposal of the place, i ll try to have a walk around the area of interest to see if there is some place else it can be held. Thanks --Alaniaris (talk) 13:24, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, i 've seen it. If i 'm gone though it ll be from the 29th of March till the 15th of April. But i 'll know for sure by the 25th so i might as well make it on one of the meetups (or both if i 'm very lucky!!!) --Alaniaris (talk) 13:53, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello from me too. I am highly intrested in such a meeting, but unfortunately i wont be in Athens till 1st of April. Please inform me for any arrangements and anything new on this subject Ppapadeas (talk) 21:22, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Maas

I edited your draft without realising it was still in userspace ... just small points. Charles Matthews (talk) 16:36, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's nice, thx. I've lost track of translating it, soooo hard... Sarazyn • 丁人LK • DE 01:04, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Werjae.jpg

I declined your speedy deletion request for Image:Werjae.jpg because it is not clear that the image is not PD. It would be better to request deletion in WP:IFD, where you can explain in detail why it is not PD. (Many sysops, like me, are not familiar with German copyright laws.) Pegasus «C¦T» 03:30, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's quite simple: The picture was clearly taken in the 50s or 60s. This means that its author can't be dead long enough to be in the public domain. Therefore, the picture still is copyrighted and should be deleted. Sarazyn • 丁人LK • DE 16:50, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Your note about the Friedrich Solmsen article was much appreciated. How nice of you to take the time to leave it. Cynwolfe (talk) 21:40, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I seem to remember not being sure about Solmsen's year of birth based on whatever info I had, so yes, it's best to go with your source. I've written a very few articles on classical scholars, and most of them are quite insubstantial, but when I rely on a scholar frequently in writing other kinds of articles, I like to have a link to lend some substance to their authority. My user page has a list of articles that are mainly my work; the only one on a scholar that's anywhere near as developed as Solmsen's is Pieter Willem van der Horst, because after I wrote my usual bland stub, someone left a note pointing me to an extremely interesting controversy he was involved in. The only modern scholar I plan to develop a "real" article on at present is Elizabeth Rawson; I've now got the goods to do so, but must finish up a few other things I'm working on first. Cynwolfe (talk) 20:52, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Emmanuel Kriaras

Hi. I don't know if you saw my message the last time, but a blog is not a reliable source, so it cannot be used as a citation for Emmanuel Kriaras's date of birth. Furthermore, this particular blog proves itself to be an unreliable source by contradicting itself: How can he be in his 104th year if that article is from July 22, 2009 and he was born in November? That only works with the April date of birth, which was sourced to a news article about his birthday that has now gone offline. If you have a better source for the November birthdate, then I'll gladly accept the change, since the old source for April has disappeared, but a blog won't do, sorry. Cheers, CP 15:43, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm... interesting. Perhaps the best idea would be to put "November 1906" and add a footnote saying essentially what you wrote on my talk page? Cheers, CP 20:57, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings

Thanks, Jonathan, for your kind message on my talk page -- I'm sorry I was slow to reply, but I'm working hard on a conference paper right now (about the luxuries of King Solomon: not too far, in fact, from my usual subject area). And thank you for putting my biography on de:wiki. It's good to be there! Very best wishes -- Andrew Dalby 14:54, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Translation of Page?

I noticed that de.wiki has a page about Cueva Antón, however, there is no Cueva Antón on en.wiki. Judging by the fact that you do speak German (Ich bin nur Deutsch lernen), could you translate? A p3rson ‽ 20:31, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Credo Reference Update & Survey (your opinion requested)

Credo Reference, who generously donated 400 free Credo 250 research accounts to Wikipedia editors over the past two years, has offered to expand the program to include 100 additional reference resources. Credo wants Wikipedia editors to select which resources they want most. So, we put together a quick survey to do that:

Link to Survey (should take between 5-10 minutes): http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/N8FQ6MM

It also asks some basic questions about what you like about the Credo program and what you might want to improve.

At this time only the initial 400 editors have accounts, but even if you do not have an account, you still might want to weigh in on which resources would be most valuable for the community (for example, through WikiProject Resource Exchange).

Also, if you have an account but no longer want to use it, please leave me a note so another editor can take your spot.

If you have any other questions or comments, drop by my talk page or email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers! Ocaasi^{t | c} 17:21, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Gerhard Schmidt

Thanks for the interwiki link. BTW, there's a translation template on the talk page giving proper attribution to the German article. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 15:33, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Albert Herrmann, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pilsen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:41, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Zhang Qian travels

Hi Jonathan, thanks for your file ZhangQianTravel.jpg . Unfortunately, there is one inconsitency: the Yuezhi (old transcription: Yüeh-chih) are transcripted this way in pinyin; Yuehzhi is wrong (one "h" that should not be there). Reilinger (talk) 13:00, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 20:41, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi^{t | c} 15:12, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for your help last week. I've translated another article, Theodor Birt, and added some paragraphs. The translation template needs a version number etc. Is it obvious where to find these? Any comments or criticism welcome. JohnD'Alembert (talk) 23:12, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ward W. Briggs

Hi Jonathan, you are the creator of all the German Wikipedia article links (I added) to the List of Presidents of the American Philological Association. Following some links I stumbled upon de:Benutzer:Jonathan Groß/Literaturstipendium. Do you still have the Ward W. Briggs book? If yes, I wonder if you can create a list of all the Sanskritists mentioned in the book. Chances are majority of the Scholars mentioned there are Rome/Greek experts, a filtered list of Sanskritists (and/or Indologists) will be very helpful to me. Solomon 7968 10:25, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Sorry for getting so long to reply to this. I left a note at Talk:Ward W. Briggs (for others, if any, interested) and intend to get back to this. Solomon 7968 07:59, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jonathan Groß. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jonathan Groß. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jonathan Groß. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been removed from Wikipedia:Local Embassy due to inactivity

Hi Jonathan Groß! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:Local Embassy, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 6 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:Local Embassy.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:06, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]