Jump to content

User talk:Sjharte

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A welcome from Sango123

[edit]

Hello, Sjharte, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy Wiki-ing!

-- Sango123 17:05, August 22, 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Welcome from an old friend

[edit]

Dear Stephen,

great to see you on here. Thanks for the ammendments... cobbled the article together from my knowledge of UFMCC. Great to see other articles appearing on Wikipedia now. Ace! Do you mind if I wikify some of your articles further? Davidkinnen 08:46, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Naming conventions

[edit]

I really love all your work on GLBT theology and religion articles, especially the Metropolitan Community Church and affiliated persons. Just a note that Wikipedia naming conventions don't allow for the use of formal titles, such as "Rev" or "Dr" in the name of the article. I have moved several that you created. Thanks again! EdwinHJ | Talk 00:07, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Metropolitan Community Church, Edinburgh

[edit]

Moved the page. KHM03 20:50, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I edited the page on "queer theology" page to include links to (DR) Rembert S. Truluck's page, and to truthsetsfree.net, another "gay christian" site.
In the process, I also added a religion-stub for (Dr) Truluck.
And it was also me who added the link to the Anti-"queer theology" site, which you removed, siting reason that it was "not about this debate".

I protest that your deletion was a POV-inspired deletion.
My edit's, I suggest, where balanced, NPOV - two supporting the idea of "queer theology", one against, and the creation of an NPOV page, which I contend added to this category, as Dr. Truluck is an prominent "gay christian".

How can you justify that a link to a page giving the other side of the argument is "not about this debate"?
(It's not as if I edited the article to include the stuff in the counter argument - I merely added a link!)


I would suggest that the fact that you are a member of the MCC (which, I presume is a "gay christian" church), adds weight to my argument that your deletion was a partisan, POV-inspired deleltion.

As I understand it, Wikipedia is an "encyclopedia", this means that pages are not "adverts" for one any particular idea, they must attempt to give some degree of balanced analysis.

The idea is that any user, of whatever "persuasion", might look up this page, read the main tenets of the article, and then have an opportunity to see other related ideas, including arguments against.

For example, if someone looks up the article on Stalin, he/she may wish to link to some external pages which are pro Stalin or anti Stalin.


I hope you will respond to my post, otherwise we may get into a rather silly add/delete cycle.


BTW, I put "queer theology" and "gay christian" in quotes as these are debated labels - it is my understanding that not every "gay" person would label themselves as "queer" - I notice that more and more we see the tag "LGBTQ" rather than "LGBT", making a distinction between queer and gay - I certainly haven't put these phrases in quotes to suggest any disparagement of these "labels".


BTW (2), I notice that you say in an earlier message that Dr's and Rev's should be removed - I'm not familiar with the justification for this. Can you explain?

CPMCE 01:17, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

--Sjharte 10:50, 27 November 2005 (UTC) Hi.[reply]

I think you must have misread something on the use of "Rev" and "Dr" etc - that was comment directed at me by someone else.

The article on Queer Theology is supposed to be just that - an explanation of the existence and devlopment of this branch of theology. The pro/anti gay debate is real and valid - my suggestion was that it not take place in this article as it would overwhlem it. Perhaps a "see also" link to those many otehr parts of wikipedia where that debate takes place - and I have made this change

The term "Queer" is a controversial one in many areas but it is the "term of art" for this type of theological by teh academic practitioners of it. Accordinly, I have made this point in the article but again would suggest that the validity or otherwise of the term "queer" is better handled in the queer section rather than repeated here. I have made refernece to this is the "see also" section.

The original links that I put in were to a US major acedemic institution that studied queer theologya nd to an online Queer Theology jounal. Both totally in point. I did not seek to put in links to gay ministries or affirming congregations (what you called "gay churches") - others did that. I would personal prefer to see those links to go too so that this piece could focus solely on discussion of this branch of theology and leave other issues to otehr posts.

In conclusion, I hope that you wills ee that i have not saw myself as trying to enforce my personal POV but instead tried to keep the article clean and relevant as it grows.

Join the Wikipedian communities

[edit]

Thanks for your reply. I take your point, and will not get into a "silly add/delete cycle" as threatened! As a compromise, I added this debate to the discussion page of the "queer theology" page.

I don't know if your interested, but IMHO your user page could be expanded, tarted up a bit! For example, you may wish to add yourself to the list of users in Scotland... Category:Wikipedians in Scotland|Sjharte Category:Wikipedians_in_the_United_Kingdom|Sjharte and you may wish to add your name to the list of LGBT Wikipedians : Category:LGBT Wikipedians|Sjharte

Just click on edit and copy the releveant text above onto your user page, putting it in double square brackets: [[]]!

Oh, and BTW, don't type so fast! Avoid typos! CPMCE 17:24, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Winnie Ewing

[edit]

I noticed that you editted Winnie Ewing's article to add her to the 'LGBT rights opposition' category and added text stating "joined her son Fergus Ewing in opposing repeal [of section 2A]". I was suprised to hear this and I checked the details of the vote [1] and found that both Ewings (not including Margaret) abstained rather than opposed. I see that the wording simply means "did not vote for repeal" but I this gives the notion that the Ewings voted against as opposed to not voting at all. I have changed the article to note this and have removed the 'LGBT rights opposition' category as many MSPs effectively abstained by not being present for the vote (such as Donald Dewar) and it is unfair to lump them in with the Tories or Souter. Jizz 12:32, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GBT Rights Opposition Category/Pope John Paul II

[edit]

I have only edited that page once and am not aware of any LGBT issue regarding the edit I made. -Drdisque 23:21, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pages listed on Categories for deletion

[edit]

Discussion on CFD - proposal to merge all subcats of Category:Members of the United Kingdom Parliament from Scottish constituencies up into the main cat. Relevant categories which would be deleted are:

I think that this is a rather important discussion for editors interested in Scotland-related articles, especially Scottish politics and Scottish biographical articles (particularly local history). Please have a read and ponder, and contribute to the debate if you like. Thanks. --Mais oui! 18:18, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It would also be relevant in this context to consider the discussions in the parent category for the UK parliament: Category talk:British MPs. I find it regrettable that Mais oui! has engaged in a restructuring of that category without entering into the discussions there. --BrownHairedGirl 18:03, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category of "women writers" under review for reinstatement

[edit]

Hi! I hope you will pardon this notice, but the category "women writers" was recently deleted and is now up for deletion review. I noticed that you commented on an earlier discussion about "women" as a qualifier in categories and thought that you might like to know about the current discussion. scribblingwoman 16:39, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Desist now from your smear campaign and personal attacks

[edit]

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.

It is considered especially offensive to use Edit summaries to conduct personal attacks. --Mais oui! 10:44, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, not meant to be personal but I hope you too will avoid the temptation to spin everything from a SNP perspective. The phrase "smear campaign" re the MacNeil issue is a POV statement by you. Please stay NPOV.--Sjharte 10:49, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:LGBT

[edit]

Hey, you might be interested in joining Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studies. Even if you don't join, if you ever need assistance in related areas on Wikipedia, ask at the project's talk page: WT:LGBT. — coelacan — 08:40, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Arlene Ackerman

[edit]

Your article about the Rev. Ackerman is up for AfD and thought maybe you should be aware of that. Callelinea 21:04, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think Wikipedia would be much improved if you would edit Ackerman's article to establish her notability (as well as remove all those dreadful tags). I prodded her originally, but am starting to wonder if with a little work she mightn't deserve an entry here. I know little about her though, so could you have a go?.
And I second your invitation to join WP:LGBT. The MCC is clearly an important art of LGBt and Christianity, but our article are not what they might be. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 12:57, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Jamie Rennie

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Jamie Rennie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 11:10, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CC Blooms

[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article CC Blooms, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of CC Blooms. Jfire (talk) 17:40, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of CC Blooms

[edit]

A tag has been placed on CC Blooms requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Beeblbrox (talk) 06:19, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Metropolitan Community Churches in London

[edit]

I have nominated Metropolitan Community Churches in London, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metropolitan Community Churches in London. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Outsider80 (talk) 06:00, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of John Hein

[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on John Hein, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because John Hein seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting John Hein, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 20:02, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of John Hein

[edit]

I have nominated John Hein, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Hein. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:26, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello Sjharte! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 7 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 698 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Karen Dunbar - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Mona West - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Diane Fisher - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Jim Mitulski - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  5. Caroline Flanagan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  6. Bernard Ponsonby - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  7. Andy Braunston - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:43, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Andy Braunston

[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Andy Braunston. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Braunston. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Rodney Berman

[edit]

I have nominated Rodney Berman, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodney Berman. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Wintonian (talk) 00:28, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Don Eastman

[edit]

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Don Eastman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Lionel (talk) 04:32, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Metropolitan Community Church in East London

[edit]

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Metropolitan Community Church in East London requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Lionel (talk) 05:01, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cecilia Eggleston

[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Cecilia Eggleston, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cecilia Eggleston until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jonathunder (talk) 13:21, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations

[edit]

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Lionel (talk) 20:07, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Elizabeth Stroud (pastor)

[edit]

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Elizabeth Stroud (pastor) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Lionel (talk) 21:27, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Equality Network

[edit]

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Equality Network requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Lionel (talk) 06:41, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pat Bumgardner

[edit]

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Pat Bumgardner requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Lionel (talk) 21:30, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion nomination of Delores P. Berry

[edit]

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Delores P. Berry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Lionel (talk) 23:27, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedian in Residence at the National Library of Scotland

[edit]

I'm just dropping you a quick note about a new Wikipedian in Residence job that's opened up at the National Library of Scotland. There're more details at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scotland#Wikimedian in Residence at the National Library of Scotland. Richard Symonds (WMUK) (talk) 14:56, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:#if:|==Proposed deletion of Norman Shanks==|{{subst:Firstarticle if new|target=Norman Shanks|nothanks=}}

Proposed deletion of Norman Shanks

}}

Notice

The article Norman Shanks has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. {{subst:#if: | The nominator also raised the following concern:

|}}

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Duckduckgo (talk) 18:00, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Queer theology for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Queer theology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queer theology until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LadyofShalott 16:47, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sjharte&oldid=1058227256"