User talk:SpArC

Username

Regarding the request on your user page: usernames must start with a capital letter, if you would like to change your username to "Pradeep.V", you can post a request at Wikipedia:Changing username. jwillbur^talk 22:25, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

--Thanks Jwillbur :)

Your attention needed at WP:CHU

Hello. A bureaucrat or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up as soon as possible. Thank you. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 19:14, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Olivepad vt10

The article Olivepad vt10 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NN product

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Toddst1 (talk) 04:46, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I din't undo.

hi, Look at my changes. I have removed the redundant terms like Holy, Divine and also i ahve cut short some of the long names. I din't simply undo your edit and moreover i din't even do undo. Wasifwasif (talk) 13:14, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake. Looked like a complete undo. Could you trim down the article? It appears to be too religion centric, big and goes on to list various kings and rulers. A random person looking up 'Erwadi' would not be interested in all that info. --SpArC (talk) 14:31, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

yeah. WIll have to spare some time to work on that. Will do it. Wasifwasif (talk) 12:23, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rupee Symbol

Hello, SpArC. You have new messages at Orionist's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Kochi Metro

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia for anyone across the world to be able to see it to get some knowledge. So I guess we need values in both INR and USD for being more reader friendly. You will be amazed how many people outside India read about India. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mittal.fdk (talk • contribs) 22:09, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moved it to the talk page --SpArC (talk) 03:32, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Olivepad-home-screen-3d.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Olivepad-home-screen-3d.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 09:59, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed it. Thanks for pointing that out. SpArC (talk) 12:37, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ganga

Please contribute to the discussion on move on Ganga talk page. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 06:23, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm with you --SpArC (talk) 09:48, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stay tuned and respond to arguments. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 13:03, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ervadi

Hi,

wikipedia is not a forum to dump newspaper garbages and it is not a BLOG to showing the news, showing incidents (news).

If you will show the policy of wiki to publishing about the daily news i am not not going to delete

Regards Lamchungli

Hello, please take a look at Mumbai. It has news item about the 2008 bomb blasts. The only way I found out about Erwadi is because of the faith based healing homes and an accident there. It is not garbage. It is news and part of the city. If you search for 'Erwadi' in google, many links on the first page refer to the accident.SpArC (talk) 15:29, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did not found that news in Mumbai; I did not found even the word "blast" on the page.... let me know where it is in? any have .. I don't want the references of other cities (it may in wrong way) . I just want to know, did wiki is allow to publish the news or not?.

If yes, (I will wait till 28th nov 2010. ) just give me the link and point number else remove that items....

If you are not ready to remove that item i will. Regards Lamchungli

Hi SpArC you are not able to show the policy. (because it is against of wiki).. so Please remove that content... if you are not delete the content i will ...

thanks Lanchungli

Going to remove end of this week. Hope that you agreed my points.. thanks Lanchungli

Let me put it this way: there is no rule against placing news. It is very relevant to Erwadi. A google search http://www.google.co.in/search?q=Erwadi yields information about the accident which happened years ago. I'll be forced to report this if you delete the content. --SpArC (talk) 16:07, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also see images, http://www.google.co.in/images?q=Erwadi&biw=1366&bih=677. --SpArC (talk) 16:11, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just look at the first line of Wikipedia:No_original_research Wikipedia does not publish original research. The term "original research" refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and stories so not able to publish the facts - Ishaq

The Erwadi accident is not original research or rumour. It has been widely published. It has also been mentioned in websites of organizations which cater for special needs children. --SpArC (talk) 13:01, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i think you did not understand the above point...

original research == facts = ervadi accident so not able to publish

Let the article contain the incident. No harm. But undue importance need not be given to the incident. Wasifwasif (talk) 12:21, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2016 Asia Cup

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 2016 Asia Cup requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Jinkinson talk to me 23:41, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you recently removed some content from California textbook controversy over Hindu history without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kautilya3 (talk) 22:07, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Language parameter

Hi there, re: this, the |language= parameter of the {{Infobox film}} template is to be used for the languages a film was produced in, not for dubs. In this case, the correct parameters are Telugu and Tamil, as Baahubali was filmed in both languages. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:29, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nota film poster.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:17, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

C/o Kancharapalem moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, C/o Kancharapalem, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 17:57, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:C-o Kancharapalem poster.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:15, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:C-o Kancharapalem poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:C-o Kancharapalem poster.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:18, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: o Kancharapalem (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SshibumXZ was:

Whilst this film seems—even if borderline—notable, this draft, in its current state, does not meet either Wikipedia's general notability guidelines or Wikipedia's subject-specific notability guideline for movies. More specifically, only the Times of India reference meets Wikipedia's guideline on reliable sources, the other two references viz. the IMDB one and the Mirchi9 probably don't meet WP:RS, especially the IMDB one, see:WP:RS/IMDB or WP:Citing IMDB. So, all in all, one more reliable, independent reference from a good source may just do the trick. All the best!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:C/o Kancharapalem and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:C/o Kancharapalem, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 06:17, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SpArC! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 06:17, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, SpArC. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome!
Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 06:22, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks SshibumXZ. It's tough. The wikipedia rules can be daunting to a new user. So daunting that it can scare them away. SpArC (talk) 06:39, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SpArC I know, I have heard about the steep learning curve on Wikipedia, what I'd advise you is to first edit some relatively uncontroversial stuff and then proced to edit more controversial things, that is somewhat akin to what I did, I don't still edit highly contentious topics such as caste, politicians et al, though. Nonetheless, I think my way doing it is better than just head-in getting into Wikipedia.
Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 06:50, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Nota film poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Nota film poster.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:16, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:C-o Kancharapalem poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:C-o Kancharapalem poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nota film poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nota film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nota film poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nota film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:39, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nota film poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nota film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, SpArC. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nota (upcoming film) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nota (upcoming film). Since you had some involvement with the Nota (upcoming film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 16:40, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]