User talk:Stevey7788/Archive9

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Friends of Puerto Rico[edit]

Hello, would you please take a look at the page? The organization had national involement in the Hurricane Maria collections of supplies.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Friends_of_Puerto_Rico

Thank you!--68.33.74.126 (talk) 21:57, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please Suggest[edit]

Hi Stevey, I have edited my draft : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:OptraScan basis your review. Please do let me know if any more changes are required.Dranaghapathologist (talk)

Hi Stevey ! Thanks for reviewing my draft : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:OptraScan since it was rejected I need your help to understand if the below references would work to qualify for a wikipedia article: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30640753; https://www.financialexpress.com/industry/technology/healthcare-tech-improving-cancer-treatment-outcomes-with-digital-tech/1506333/; http://tissuepathology.com/2019/01/23/optrascan-announces-expansion-of-medical-advisory-board/#axzz5jH0XXpEm; https://journals.lww.com/appliedimmunohist/Abstract/publishahead/A_Multi_Institutional_Study_to_Evaluate_Automated.98753.aspx; http://tissuepathology.com/2018/12/17/a-premier-hospital-in-india-adopts-digital-pathology-from-optrascan-with-a-focus-on-ai-ml-based-image-analysis-solution/#axzz5jH0XXpEm; Dranaghapathologist (talk) 16.33, 26 March, 2019 (IST) —Preceding undated comment added 11:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sinhala[edit]

Hi Stevey! Thanks for your comment on the move review. I've written an essay at User:Danielklein/Name of majority language spoken in Sri Lanka concluding that "Sinhala" is the name we should be using now based solely on facts, not opinion. That may or may not be the right approach. When the time is right, I'd appreciate your assistance getting Sinhala language and Sinhala script back to their rightful titles. It may even be necessary to have a policy specifically for Sinhala that future editors can point to. I've found Special:Contributions/112.134.1.166 where someone has anonymously and unilaterally decided to change "Sinhala" to "Sinhalese" in many pages and even templates. This may be the same user Sphilbrick on their mobile who unilaterally moved Sinhala alphabet to Sinhalese alphabet a few days before those anonymous changes. Danielklein (talk) 12:59, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Danielklein: These changes can take a lot of effort to get done on Wikipedia. Have you tried contacting the people at Ethnologue and Glottolog to get expert opinions? If not, I can do so and try to get expert opinions. — Stevey7788 (talk) 13:39, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No, I haven't tried contacting anyone outside Wikipedia. If you could do so that would be great! As far as I'm concerned the factual evidence speaks for itself and "Sinhala" is obviously the common modern name. However, I've been very surprised at the strength of opposition to using the WP:COMMONNAME. I'm an amateur linguist of European descent with an interest in Indic languages (among others). I know a lot but I wouldn't go so far as to call myself an expert. I'd appreciate any support, such as from Ethnologue and Glottolog, however, their conclusion would need to be that "Sinhala" is the common name, not just the correct name. In any case, there isn't just one correct name, "Sinhalese" is equally correct, just not equally common. I.e. "Sinhala" and "Sinhalese" are both correct, but only one of them can be the most common. Did you read my essay? Do you agree with its arguments, impartiality, and conclusion? Do you think it's helpful or harmful in settling this issue? Danielklein (talk) 23:50, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I skimmed over it and saw some good points. Let me talk to the language cataloging experts and see what they think. Best to contact Indic languages experts as well, who should have the final authority on this issue. — Stevey7788 (talk) 20:18, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The problem with relying on expert opinion is that it can be attacked as not representative of how English is commonly used. This is why I've researched technology companies who offer their services in other languages, because they need to be aware of what their market expects, and reputable news organisations, because they need to use good contemporary English. I think it's very helpful to mention that all languages organisations (that I've seen so far anyway) are unanimous that the language is primarily called "Sinhala" in English, but that fact shouldn't be relied on to sway enough people to get consensus. Any argument for using "Sinhalese" has to demonstrate why so many reputable organisations would choose to be wrong. Danielklein (talk) 23:39, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted[edit]

Hi Stevey7788. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Minor user rights can now be accorded on a time limited or probationary period, so do check back at WP:PERM/NPR in case this concerns your application. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encylopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

  • Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance. so that they are aware.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
  • If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:30, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Salvio giuliano: Thanks Salvio! I've been carefully reading Wikipedia policies and participating in community curation activities such as AfD, so I'll be sure to use these tools as well as I can. — Stevey7788 (talk) 16:56, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted[edit]

Hi Stevey7788. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:37, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Salvio giuliano: Thanks Salvio! I've been carefully reading Wikipedia policies and participating in community curation activities such as AfD, so I'll be sure to use these tools as well as I can. — Stevey7788 (talk) 16:56, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.17[edit]

Hello Stevey7788,

News
Discussions of interest
  • Two elements of CSD G6 have been split into their own criteria: R4 for redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons (Discussion), and G14 for disambiguation pages which disambiguate zero pages, or have "(disambiguation)" in the title but disambiguate a single page (Discussion).
  • {{db-blankdraft}} was merged into G13 (Discussion)
  • A discussion recently closed with no consensus on whether to create a subject-specific notability guideline for theatrical plays.
  • There is an ongoing discussion on a proposal to create subject-specific notability guidelines for chemicals and organism taxa.
Reminders
  • NPR is not a binary keep / delete process. In many cases a redirect may be appropriate. The deletion policy and its associated guideline clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted. Redirects are not contentious. See a classic example of the templates to use. More templates are listed at the R template index. Reviewers who are not aware, do please take this into consideration before PROD, CSD, and especially AfD because not even all admins are aware of such policies, and many NAC do not have a full knowledge of them.
NPP Tools Report
  • Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages) and more without navigating away from the article itself.
  • copyvio-check – automatically checks the copyvio percentage of new pages in the background and displays this info with a link to the report in the 'info' panel of the Page curation toolbar.
  • The NPP flowchart now has clickable hyperlinks.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828
Looking for inspiration? There are approximately 1000 female biographies to review.
Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Simón Bolívar University[edit]

Thank you Stevey7788, I try my best to promote information in various languages.

Sendtel + (talk) 23:23, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rayan (singer)[edit]

There was a problem with the formatting of the AfD for Rayan (singer); a new AfD should have been created rather than adding the new nomination to the prior AfD page. However, as it turns out, Rayan (singer) has been speedily deleted already. I would have fixed the formatting of the AfD for you, but it's no longer needed at this point. Please let me know if you have any objection. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:51, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Metropolitan90: Thanks for helping to fix this. I just realized that there was a former AfD, and that this is the 2nd one. — Stevey7788 (talk) 13:28, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Johnson (businessman)[edit]

Thank you Stevey7788 for your explanation on why you deleted the draft. I will add the references accordingly. I just wanted to know what part of the content of my article needs these secondary, independent sources? If it is posible for you to specify (Sentence). Also, how long do I have to edit the text? (ATAVLATIN (talk) 11:40, 20 March 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Greg Herman / Fashion Designer[edit]

Hi Stevey,


I hope this email finds you well. I'm writing to you to discuss regarding the Greg Herman: Fashion Designer article I wrote. Thank you for your review. I read your comment that noted 'not yet notable enough'. Can you please elaborate? Not notable to whom? It's extremely vague, and if you are not in the world of fashion how is that determination made? Greg has been around forever as a handbag designer. They even teach case studies on him at FIDM and he has inspired many people like myself in the fashion industry. Wikipedia has articles on designers much less important. Much of what he accomplished- his biggest contributions noted in the press predate the internet, so there's not as much to be found as other current designers. But like Judith Leiber and other pioneering designers, he has helped to carve out and curate collections that have inspired others and helped them to take up careers in the industry.

I think I wrote a well-represented and executed article on him which is very relevant to the history of fashion and specifically accessories/ handbags. Please advise on how you would change it, and what is needed for it to be added to the Wiki world or articles. I think his story is important and inspring and should be added in. Thank you for all your help and time.

Lorraine

173.197.72.131 (talk) 19:02, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


HI Stevey,

Hope all is well with you. Were you able to review this? Please advise on best way to proceed. Thank you.

Best,

Lorraine

173.197.72.131 (talk) 18:19, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


HI Stevey,

Hope all is well with you-- reaching out to you again. Were you able to review this? Please advise on best way to proceed and getting it published. Thank you.

Best,

Lorraine

173.197.72.131 (talk) 18:38, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 23:49:27, 20 March 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Deborah Swan[edit]


So I'm very confused. Almost everything I have in article has a citation to a reliable source. And Leon Hefflin is not a musician. He was an African-American man during Jim Crow, racist Los Angeles that was able to not only create a Manufacturing Co., financially back a "Colored" musical, but produce the largest outdoor jazz concerts renting out baseball fields!! I have over 50 pages of newspapers articles, photos, reviews, Ads, and books to verify all of this. It is highly notable.

So obviously I need help to know which citations to use. I am self learning. I will appreciate all of your attention to this matter.

Sincerely Deborah Swan (talk) 23:49, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deborah Swan (talk) 23:49, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review of Mariah Duran[edit]

Hi Stevey7788, Thank you for reviewing Mariah Duran. Would you mind taking a look at these other skateboarders I've written wikis for: Jennifer Soto
Bryce Wettstein
Jordyn Barratt They are all teammates on the U.S.A Skateboarding National Team.

Thank you, --Wil540 art (talk) 00:28, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Wil540 art: Checked each of them to make sure they're notable and do not contain promotional content. Review done. — Stevey7788 (talk) 00:30, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Stevey7788: Thank you. --Wil540 art (talk) 00:32, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment on Draft:Antouin_Sehnaoui[edit]

Hey Stevey, thank you so much for taking the time to look at, and write a comment on, the draft. This is my first time so thank you for being gentle :) Can you give me an example of where you mean I shoudl tone down the language as I looked at it again and found no peacock terms (thank you as I was able to learn about those).

I also have a question about the photo I used as other Wikipedia users keep flagging it as a copyrights violation but I used the one on the official website and it has a CC BY-4.0 license posted next to it so I don't understand how I am violating copyrights ...

Thank you,

WikiLeb19 (talk) 01:26, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you for your review of Draft: Chelsea Cutler[edit]

Like the user above me, this is my first time creating a Wiki page. If I were to remove the tweets as references and add in a few more articles, would that be sufficient to get the article published? What more does the article lack and how can I get it dialed in?

Thank you,

2605:A601:A020:9CE:8453:418F:2BCF:413C (talk) 05:54, 21 March 2019 (UTC) Alex[reply]

@2605:A601:A020:9CE:8453:418F:2BCF:413C: It's not about the presence or lack of references. See Wikipedia:No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability. The article subject is unfortunately not notable because not all new artists can qualify for Wikipedia articles. See WP:SIGCOV, WP:TOOSOON, WP:MUSICBIO, WP:GARAGEBAND. The article subject needs to gain notability first through reliable independent sources. — Stevey7788 (talk) 11:41, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Review of The Homeless Foundation page[edit]

Hello Stevey

Thanks for taking the time to review the page. I am aware you have picked out issues. I am at a loss on what to do with this to get it published, both in tmers of style (the opening is too long?) and the sources. I can remove sources - but unsure if that will work. So, how do this move forward? Thanks Lee Leemac71 (talk) 07:57, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Leemac71: Your article subject may be notable, but you need to cite better sources and not just the subject's self-published work, because Wikipedia articles need independent, reliable sources. Other Wikipedia articles should also not be cited. A Google News search reveals that there are some good articles from the BBC, CNN, and other acceptable articles from major, well-known media outlets. Significant press coverage and notability need to be demonstrated this way. After rewriting and resubmitting, your article may be able to go through. Good luck! — Stevey7788 (talk) 11:55, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your initial review of Draft: Sapiir[edit]

Hi Stevey. Thanks for your comments, unfortunately I'm not sure what copyediting entails, please direct me to any guidance you might have. If this is just a review of the wording from a grammar perspective I'll have a friend of mine look it over and resubmit?

Thanks Sgrlawrence (talk) 08:47, 21 March 2019 (UTC) sgrlawrence Sgrlawrence (talk) 08:47, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Sgrlawrence: Copyediting means fixing lines like this: (f) Alcohol free. The term "alcohol free" may be used only on malt beverages containing no alcohol.|Electronic Code of Federal Regulations|PART 7—LABELING AND ADVERTISING OF MALT BEVERAGES, Subpart H §7.71 Alcoholic content.
The main problem is that article does not have enough citations or press mentions verifying that the beverage is notable. Wikipedia has this policy so that people can't just make stuff up or write about their pet projects that shouldn't actually be on encyclopedias. Sapiir.com is the only source that is cited, along with a US government code page. This looks like a non-notable pet project developed by a non-significant business in New Brunswick. — Stevey7788 (talk) 11:47, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Question[edit]

Hi Steve, I wanted to ask if an interview done by radio (with a web link to the interview) counts as a secondary source? Thank you. Alexandra.(ATAVLATIN (talk) 12:26, 21 March 2019 (UTC))[reply]

@ATAVLATIN: They don't count as reliable sources but can be supplemental references. See WP:RS. — Stevey7788 (talk) 12:27, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New article- Romanian singer Bibi/ Thank you![edit]

Hi. I was created a new article about Romanian singer and vlogger Bibi, the article has sources of good faith. THANK YOU VERY MUCH cause you help me with italics. It will be an honour for me, if you can read the article and submitted it to be publish on Wikipedia. You can do this is these days? Thank you very much. All the best! VladMihai1 (User Draft:VladMihai1 • contribs) 11:54, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@VladMihai1: You're welcome. I can fix wrong italics, but I don't think I can get it approved due to lack of notability. See WP:NOTYET. — Stevey7788 (talk) 14:02, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please look at Claudia Pavel article or others stubs about Romanian artist, I have search for properly sources, very reliable and Bibi is as Nicole Cherry or others teen stars from Romania, and notable as well. Thanks a lot. VladMihai1 contribs) —Preceding undated comment added 11:09, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Review: Batbayar Chogsom[edit]

Thanks for the review. Jonawi (talk) 14:18, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 15:49:08, 21 March 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by PatGallacher[edit]



PatGallacher (talk) 15:49, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that Argentine provincial deputies are inherently notable, see WP:POLITICIAN. PatGallacher (talk) 15:49, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@PatGallacher: Thanks. I know that governors and ministers are notable; I wasn't exactly sure about deputies. The article needs some more work and it might be acceptable. — Stevey7788 (talk) 15:52, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You say that you are not exactly sure about deputies. I think if you read WP:POLITICIAN properly you will see that they are notable. I am trying to improve the article, but one problem is that a lot of Argentine govt. websites seem to be kaput at the moment. PatGallacher (talk) 16:37, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@PatGallacher: Try resubmitting the draft using the blue submit button. These officials are sort of in the gray zone for notability. But if you start up good articles on a lot of provincial deputies in Argentina, then I don't see why not. Notability guidelines aren't set rules on Wikipedia, and they're often really meant to filter out self-promotional content and "listcruft" rather than stuff like this. — Stevey7788 (talk) 16:43, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See also Wikipedia:Inherent notability. PatGallacher (talk) 16:46, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@PatGallacher: You're an autoconfirmed user, so you can just go ahead and post this as a new article. The topic looks good to me. Let me know if you need any help. — Stevey7788 (talk) 16:48, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Hi, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, 1984–85 Four-Nations Cup, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

CASSIOPEIA(talk) 16:33, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback![edit]

Hey, I'm A Rainbow, thank you for reviewing my page and giving me suggestions. I figured that page would be best individually, but you probably know more than me. Anyways, I will definitely see if I can improve my page or if worst comes to worst, I may just request deletion. Thanks, A Rainbow (talk) 14:31, 22 March 2019 (UTC) A Rainbow[reply]

@A Rainbow: Try putting it in the aneuploidy article. Let me know if you need any help. — Stevey7788 (talk) 16:37, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2017 UST Growling Tigers men's basketball team has been accepted[edit]

2017 UST Growling Tigers men's basketball team, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Stevey7788 (talk) 18:53, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Plymouth Rock Assurance[edit]

What you accepted was the second version of the draft. The previous version was more blatantly promotional, and I went ahead and tagged it for G11. The author then asked me to tell what language in the draft was promotional so that they could delete that language and be compliant. That inquiry was made in the first person plural. I didn't give a specific answer, but the second version was better, as you saw. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:45, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert McClenon: Thanks for the heads up. Blatantly promotional spam does not deserve a place on Wikipedia, but I think this article should be fine if we clean it up and make sure the contributor follows all Wikipedia policies. — Stevey7788 (talk) 17:38, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stevey,

Could you please help me understand whats the problem with my COI article? The previous reviewer said I needed to move it from draft space to article space. Could you help me understand what he meant? Thanks. Nwalavalkar786 (talk) 13:20, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stevey,

I have made the change for the COI article. I have also notified Robert McClenon for the same. He insists he doesn't want to help a COI editor like me. Request you to guide me through this.

Thanks.Nwalavalkar786 (talk) 14:45, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Admin's Barnstar
very nice work Shaharyar jadoon (talk) 18:09, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the barnstar @Shaharyar jadoon:! Sufi history is a topic that really intrigues me. We definitely need more quality articles on Sufism on Wikipedia. It can be hard to find good sources on Sufism, so you've done a good job writing up the article. — Stevey7788 (talk) 18:17, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome Mr @Stevey7788:!

HEAAN[edit]

Hi steve, my submission HEAAN was recently accepted by you. However, I found some problems on the page which may yield some conflicts, so I would like to ask whether it is possible to roll back the page to the draft version to rearrange and fix the contents. I would be very happy to get any reply on this message. Du1204 (talk) 00:56, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Du1204: Just go to the article history at [1], click on the date, and then view the old draft. — Stevey7788 (talk) 13:26, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Stevey7788: I mean I want to close the current HEAAN page, and disclose it after rewrite the contents. Can I just remove the contents of HEAAN in edit source? Du1204 (talk) 07:08, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Du1204: Yes, just remove most of the contents except for the first paragraph, and give it a stub tag. — Stevey7788 (talk) 16:21, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Stevey7788/Archive9&oldid=896413830"