User talk:TRLIJC19/Archive 15
This is an archive of past discussions about User:TRLIJC19. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 |
GGG
Hi! Why haven't you used an image in the infobox for Going, Going, Gone (Grey's Anatomy) ? (By the way, the article looks great!) Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 11:30, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks! I worked hard on it. :-) The reason there's no non-free image, is because none have a strong enough rationale for inclusion. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 18:32, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 23:03, 1 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
TBrandley 23:03, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 23:16, 1 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
TBrandley 23:16, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Once Upon a Time
I noticed you watch OUAT. I don't watch that stuff, I watch The Simpsons and Bob's Burgers when that's on, because I love animation. Just a note, this is completely random lol. Cheers! TBrandley 01:00, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- OUAT scored a higher demo than the Animation Domination last night! :-) I used to watch The Simpsons, but I feel like it's gotten so bad over the years. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 01:02, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- Lol. Yeah, it is nowhere near as good as it used to be. TBrandley 01:09, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- I tend to view season 9 as the last more-good-than-bad season. 10 had its moments but it isn't worth dredging them up through the crap ones; from then on in the changes in tone and characterisation killed my interest in it. The joke quality has gone to the dogs entirely and hasn't been able to raise a real belly laugh for over a decade, though I'll still be on the actual floor at the earlier episodes. I shudder when I look back and realise I actually spent a childhood summer waiting to find out who shot Mr. Burns. GRAPPLE X 01:40, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- Lol yeah, I think I stopped watching regularly around my senior year of HS, so about 2006. Which season was that? TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 01:48, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- Season 17 or 18. TBrandley 01:51, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- I think it was season 17. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 01:53, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- Season 17 or 18. TBrandley 01:51, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- Lol yeah, I think I stopped watching regularly around my senior year of HS, so about 2006. Which season was that? TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 01:48, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- I tend to view season 9 as the last more-good-than-bad season. 10 had its moments but it isn't worth dredging them up through the crap ones; from then on in the changes in tone and characterisation killed my interest in it. The joke quality has gone to the dogs entirely and hasn't been able to raise a real belly laugh for over a decade, though I'll still be on the actual floor at the earlier episodes. I shudder when I look back and realise I actually spent a childhood summer waiting to find out who shot Mr. Burns. GRAPPLE X 01:40, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- Lol. Yeah, it is nowhere near as good as it used to be. TBrandley 01:09, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Going, Going, Gone (Grey's Anatomy)
On 2 October 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Going, Going, Gone (Grey's Anatomy), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that prior to the broadcast of Grey's Anatomy's season nine premiere, ABC asked Patrick Dempsey to remove a spoiler photo from his Twitter? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Going, Going, Gone (Grey's Anatomy). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:05, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 01 October 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Founder: Jimmy Wales
- News and notes: Independent review of UK chapter governance; editor files motion against Wikitravel owners
- Featured content: Mooned
- Technology report: WMF and the German chapter face up to Toolserver uncertainty
- WikiProject report: The Name's Bond... WikiProject James Bond
Talkback
Message added 02:08, 3 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
TBrandley 02:08, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
A Change Is Gonna Come (Grey's Anatomy)
Hi! I have just nominated that article for both GA and DYK. I would really appreciate if you could review both nominations! Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 15:01, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
- I would also be tremendously thankful if you could upload an image for the article's infobox, with a strong Fair Use Rationale. Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 16:01, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
- I noticed that you replied to User:TBrandley on his talk page today, but you didn't on mine. Have I done anything wrong? Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 15:11, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
- Of course not! I just forgot to respond. Sorry, but I don't really have the time right now. I'm sure it will be picked up for review quickly. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 18:48, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
- However, could you review it for DYK when/if you have the time. Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 14:16, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
- Of course not! I just forgot to respond. Sorry, but I don't really have the time right now. I'm sure it will be picked up for review quickly. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 18:48, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
- I noticed that you replied to User:TBrandley on his talk page today, but you didn't on mine. Have I done anything wrong? Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 15:11, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
WP:Grey's participants
Hey Joey, how are you doing? I new your opinion on the status of 2 users.
- If you remember, on September 4 I sent M.Mario a message for a month of inactivity and his status became semi-active. Since then, he has made 2 edits: one on September 30 on Arizona's page and then yesterday on A Change Is Gonna Come but to become active again he had to make 5 edits over the course of 2 weeks. Despite his 2 edits, he did not make the 5 required and the two he made didn't happen in the 2 weeks following the notification, only recently. My question is: am I right to have sent him a new message to notify him his inactivity of 2 months? Or did I have to wait one more week to see if he would have done 3 more edits? Does the user that becomes semi-active have to make the required edits in the 2 weeks following the notification or do we count starting the moment he makes a new edit? Do you understand my questions lol? If I should have waited then I'll erase my message...
- No, you're right. He is now inactive. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 18:50, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
- Also, I forgot to send Mattom 123 an semi-active user notification on September 28. I could send him now a message but the problem is that he edited the ninth season today and on October 1 so if I send him a message it would be weird because now he has made edits. Is it ok if I don't send him anything? --Sofffie7 (talk) 14:23, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's fine. He can be considered active. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 18:50, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
- Ok thank you :) Have a nice evening! Sofffie7 (talk) 21:46, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Remember the Time
I've just finished watching the episode; I assume you've watched the episode last night so here are my thoughts ;) This episode was actually better than last week's! It was more emotional and this time I really cried starting early in the episode because we got to see Mark alive and well (which was unexpected), knowing he would die later and how Arizona lost her leg was also very sad. I think Shonda should have made Mark slip into coma after seeing Sofia =/ I know, I'm always criticizing Shonda but I really would have liked to see him holding his baby girl and talking to her etc; it would have been cute yet hearbtreaking. It was 'good' to see him breaking up with Julia and staying true to his feelings for Lexie :) Arizona's attitude is already annoying me lol. I totally understand it's hard to lose a leg and that she's blaming everyone but I didn't like how she treated Alex though. I find it horrible that Alex was the one who had to cut off the leg. It's maybe a better choice than Callie but still! It was nice to see Owen taking care of Cristina :) I don't understand why April didn't wait for Jackson at Joe's. He really was busy and had no time to talk in the hallway to possibly tell how he feels about her. What are YOUR thoughts? What did you (dis)like? --Sofffie7 (talk) 19:35, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- Yup, I watched it while studying (hooray!). Lol, I think they should have reversed the two episodes as it seems more logical. They probably set it up like this to maintain the 4.4 rating, but the attempt failed miserably. Speaking of ratings, I hope its adjusted up a few tenths when the final ratings are posted; after all, it did run 2-3 minutes over. I'm a bit puzzled as to what medical issue actually caused Sloan's death. I also feel he should have had time to say goodbye to Sofia. Arizona was such a b!@#h to Alex; that really pissed me off! Yeah, that was a dumb move on April's part. Ugh, did you hear there's not going to be an episode next week?! I hate when they do that. So, my main disappointment is the rating. Also, unfortunately, as the week goes by, I feel more compelled to retire. If I do retire, I don't know if I would simply retire and leave a goodbye message, or vanish completely. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 19:45, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah they should have reversed them. It was a bit difficult for me to follow at the beginning when they picked up after the accident focusing on one character and letting us see what happened then going back to focus on someone else but after some time it was ok. Ouch the ratings! 16% down, that's a lot! No I didn't know that no episode would be airing =S Next week The CW's shows will premiere so I still have something to look forward to. What I hate is the big winter break when all the series stop airing new episodes...
- Oh I thought your mind was changing because of the message you sent to Tate saying "you won't end up quitting"... Why don't you take a wikibreak and see if the desire to edit comes back after a while? If it doesn't, then just come back to let us know your decision, which would be your very last edits :( I truly hope you won't retire! --Sofffie7 (talk) 20:15, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- A wikibreak sounds like a good idea. I'll start out with a short one; say 10 days. Would you mind serving as interim coordinator in my absence? Since we often collaborate on member/project issues, I feel like you'd be the best at it, because you see how I do it. If you agree, I'll write you up a little "what needs to be done" memo. I'd really appreciate it, TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 20:24, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- Hmm depends on what I have to do lol. More seriously, I'm not always sure when an IP makes a wrong edit... I've got a great example here: the time frame on the series is now hard to determine exactly. The doctors were 4 days stuck in Boise then they had to recover, which presumably took a week at least if not more and then starting the moment Mark slipped into coma, 30 days passed. So when we say "GGG" picked up 30 days after the accident it isn't true; it's more! An IP has tried to change that in GGG's page but Tate keeps erasing it... --Sofffie7 (talk) 20:31, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- Talk to Tate about that; anyways, that's not my (the coordinator's job), it's the monitor's. I mean, yes, you should be involved in all aspects but that should mainly be dealt with by Tate. Can you remain online for 20-30 minutes for me to type you up a "job description"? TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 20:34, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah sure, no problem ;) But don't you have an opinion on the matter? --Sofffie7 (talk) 20:36, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- Talk to Tate about that; anyways, that's not my (the coordinator's job), it's the monitor's. I mean, yes, you should be involved in all aspects but that should mainly be dealt with by Tate. Can you remain online for 20-30 minutes for me to type you up a "job description"? TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 20:34, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) (talk page stalker) I don't have school today (or Monday also in fact), so I figured I comment here while I'm at home. Yeah, we always need a Wikibreak sometimes to get refreshed, or other stuff, and if that doesn't work, then I guess, quit. That would be sad, but your choice. I agree with Sophie that "I hate is the big winter break when all the series stop airing new episodes", but I don't look forward too (or even watch any CW shows) The CW shows, and I do hate them. I enjoy programs on most other channels, however. Also, yeah I hate it when episode's don't air the next week. That seems to happen all the time with Animation Domination. I truly agree with Sophie's comments above. Cheers! And while I'm here, please correct me if I made a mistake at "GGG", as said above. TBrandley 20:40, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- I'll reply to your page Tate; not sure Joey cares ;) Sofffie7 (talk) 21:02, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- As interim coordinator, one must:
- (1) – Look over other board members' work. The coordinator must—
- (a) – Ensure other board members are completing their jobs efficiently, and
- (b) – Answer any questions a board member may have.
- (2) – Respond to any concerns or queries on the—
- (a) Project talk page, or
- (b) Administrative board talk page, or
- (c) Portal talk page.
- (3) – Ensure there is no major conflict between two or more project members. If there is, the coordinator should—
- (a) Try to resolve the dispute through discussion. If this does not work, they should—
- (b) Open up a case at Wikipedia's dispute resolution center.
- (4) – Monitor articles for obvious wrongdoings.
- (5) – Maintain, manage, and control the project's A-Class review.
- (1) – Look over other board members' work. The coordinator must—
- As interim coordinator, one must:
- I'll reply to your page Tate; not sure Joey cares ;) Sofffie7 (talk) 21:02, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- Hmm depends on what I have to do lol. More seriously, I'm not always sure when an IP makes a wrong edit... I've got a great example here: the time frame on the series is now hard to determine exactly. The doctors were 4 days stuck in Boise then they had to recover, which presumably took a week at least if not more and then starting the moment Mark slipped into coma, 30 days passed. So when we say "GGG" picked up 30 days after the accident it isn't true; it's more! An IP has tried to change that in GGG's page but Tate keeps erasing it... --Sofffie7 (talk) 20:31, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- A wikibreak sounds like a good idea. I'll start out with a short one; say 10 days. Would you mind serving as interim coordinator in my absence? Since we often collaborate on member/project issues, I feel like you'd be the best at it, because you see how I do it. If you agree, I'll write you up a little "what needs to be done" memo. I'd really appreciate it, TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 20:24, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- So, it's not that much work. Odds are, you won't have a major dispute between project members in the 10 days that I'm gone. Also, I highly doubt there will be an A-Class nomination in the time frame, and if there is, Tate can handle it, as he knows the process well. If it gets really bad, you can always email me for advice. I really hope you can do this for me, Sophie. Also, if you respond, please await another response from me. :-) TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 20:55, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- OK, I'll do my best to replace you. If you have another message detailing the tasks, please post it on my talk so that I can quickly go back to it if need be during the 10 days. --Sofffie7 (talk) 21:02, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- So, it's not that much work. Odds are, you won't have a major dispute between project members in the 10 days that I'm gone. Also, I highly doubt there will be an A-Class nomination in the time frame, and if there is, Tate can handle it, as he knows the process well. If it gets really bad, you can always email me for advice. I really hope you can do this for me, Sophie. Also, if you respond, please await another response from me. :-) TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 20:55, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
File:Izzie Crying on Denny.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Izzie Crying on Denny.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. TBrandley 17:25, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Watch these
Episodes from seasons one and two of The X-Files you should check out; anything I haven't listed, you can still watch but they're generally poor or best avoided. I cut out a lot of the middle-of-the-road stuff too, to be honest, episodes like "Fire" are still decent but if you want to spend a weekend getting to grips with the series it's not a standard episode, for example. GRAPPLE X 21:02, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
- "Pilot"
- "Deep Throat"
- "Squeeze"
- "Conduit"
- "Ice"
- "Fallen Angel"
- "Beyond the Sea"
- "E.B.E."
- "Darkness Falls"
- "Tooms"
- "The Erlenmeyer Flask"
- "Little Green Men"
- "The Host"
- "Sleepless"
- "Duane Barry"
- "Ascension"
- "3"
- "One Breath"
- " Irresistible"
- "Colony"
- "End Game"
- "Humbug"
- "F. Emasculata"
- "Our Town"
- "Anasazi"
- Thanks, I'll check these out when I get a chance. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 21:05, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Grey's Anatomy's medical jargon
Hey Joey! I found this interview of James Pickens, Jr where he talks about the show's medical jargon and how they approach it before filming an episode, and what they use for scenes in an OR. It could be interesting to add that to the main article, but since you're the top contributor I thought I'd give you the link and let you do it (if you think it's good). Regards, Sofffie7 (talk) 21:27, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for that; very helpful! I'll add it into #Filming locations and technique, when I find the time, or you could add it in if you want. :-) TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 21:28, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 08 October 2012
- News and notes: Education Program faces community resistance
- WikiProject report: Ten years and one million articles: WikiProject Biography
- Featured content: A dash of Arsenikk
- Discussion report: Closing RfAs: Stewards or Bureaucrats?; Redesign of Help:Contents
Linking
A problem? Is that how you call it? Whether I should like or not some terms is a matter of perspective, with the exception of the obvious ones, which I apologize for, due to not having been aware of the guideline. "Voice-over" should actually be linked! Why? Because you did so in all the episode articles you created/expanded. I was really hurt by your comments. Speaking about me in third person, instead of to me, is something I had not been expecting from you. Hopefully, our collaboration will not have to suffer because of this reason of yours that I am not aware of. Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 15:42, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
- You totally misunderstood what I was saying. First of all, I apologize if you think I was trying to sound rude. I know that internet communication doesn't translate well, so I should have been more careful in my phrasing. When I say a "problem", I do not mean it in the way that you probably think. I have seen numerous editors say on my GAN or something that "TRLIJC19 has problems with a certain guideline"; it is meant in a way to teach the user. It means that you do not fully grasp that guideline yet; not an insult at all, we all struggle with certain aspects of the MOS. I obviously knew that you would see the GAN, so I wasn't going to write a direct message at the GAN or your talk page. In addition to this, I have discussed linking with you at your talk page, so it's not new. However, linking is not perspective, and there is a set guideline for this. As for "voice-over", Baffle gab1978, a very experienced user and excellent copyeditor told me that the word should be unlinked here. Please stop comparing everything to the first few season six episode articles; as I've told you, I was not fully aware of the MOS at that point. "Voice-over" is on the bubble, in my opinion, so I have no problem with you keeping it linked. There was no need for you to assume bad faith, and "shout" at me about linking. Again, sorry if you took the comment the wrong way. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 20:19, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Episode wikilinks
Your comment in the GA review for A Change Is Gonna Come (Grey's Anatomy) says: " 'Viewed by a total of 20.93 million viewers, the episode is the series' second most-watched season premiere, just behind the third season opener, which had been watched live by 25.41 million American viewers.' -- Link the season three premiere to 'third season opener' ". However, when we were working at Losing My Religion (Grey's Anatomy), you told me that "third season opener" should not be linked to Time Has Come Today (Grey's Anatomy) because it is not the title of the episode. Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 15:02, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
- I admit I was wrong on the "Losing My Religion" review; sorry. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 18:57, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 23:58, 15 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
The Signpost: 15 October 2012
- In the media: Wikipedia's language nerds hit the front page
- Featured content: Second star to the left
- News and notes: Chapters ask for big bucks
- Technology report: Wikidata is a go: well, almost
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Chemicals
http://stats.grok.se/en/latest/Going,_Going,_Gone_(Grey%27s_Anatomy)
You've recovered the stats of this article in Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics. However, it was featured as part of DYK on October 2. Instead of 5,879, number of views should be 4,655 + 3,106 - (3,702 + 2,029)/2 = 4,896 under rules. In other words, it did not pass 5,000. --George Ho (talk) 02:55, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Double episodes
Hello! I know we've had this conversation once before, and I really am not trying to judge your point of view, but please read what I have to say. There is no double episode on Wikipedia to be split into two articles (like you told me to do for The Other Side of This Life (Part 1) and The Other Side of This Life (Part 2)). It is right that episodes like "Good Mourning" and "Goodbye (Grey's Anatomy)" are split, since they are nothing but two distinct episodes, that just "happened" to air in the same night. However, The Other Side of This Life does not consist of two episodes: it is just one episode, with double-length, unlike "Good Mourning" and "Goodbye". Please see Wikipedia:Good articles/Theatre, film and drama, in order for you to see that there are no articles that do what you say "mine" should. You will hopefully understand that the article should actually stay "The Other Side of This Life", not "The Other Side of This Life (Part 1)" and "The Other Side of This Life (Part 2)". Please don't get this the wrong way, but I'm just trying to do the right thing. Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 11:51, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
- I'm fine with you merging them, but be sure to keep the season list saying 1&2 because they were actually filmed as two episodes and not a double length feature. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 00:25, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
- Obviously, lol! Thanks for understanding! I will also do so with "Six Days", "Crash Into Me", "Freedom", and "Dream a Little of Me". Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 07:01, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
ACR
Hey! I wanted to let you know that I have nominated A Change Is Gonna Come (Grey's Anatomy) for A-Class Quality. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Grey's Anatomy A-Class review/A Change Is Gonna Come (Grey's Anatomy)/archive1 – your opinion will be very much appreciated. Thanks! Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 11:37, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
- Sure; I'll take a look soon. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 19:12, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
Grey's Anatomy Cast Photos
Since Grey's Anatomy got new cast photos this year, do you think that we should change the photos of the characters that are the main cast members for this season. Since most of the cast photos are from either 6 or 7, do you think we should make it the most current photos? Tvlover96 (talk) 17:47, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
- Yes I'll update them shortly. Also, would you be able to do a ratings chart for S8 of GA? Thanks, TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 19:13, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
- Yep, I started working on the table a little bit ago today, and am about halfway done. So when the ratings table is complete, I will put it on season 8's page. Tvlover96 (talk) 19:15, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
- Great :-) TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 19:16, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
- Yep, I started working on the table a little bit ago today, and am about halfway done. So when the ratings table is complete, I will put it on season 8's page. Tvlover96 (talk) 19:15, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
Did you hear? Series creator Shonda Rhimes canceled her own series Private Practice, and called it a "heartbreaking" decision, I fear this will soon hurt the Private Practice task force, are your upset? Ah well, at least it's not Grey's Anatomy. ;) TBrandley 01:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
- I just heard. Sigh. Based on SR's post, I'm almost positive it was the network's call – probably due to low ratings. It's her own fault. PP was doing fine in its post-Grey's time-slot, because the two shows are similar. Then she created Scandal and moved PP to a random slot. And Scandal isn't even doing well; it hit a 1.9 last night. As for GA, it scored a 3.4 last night so I think it's safe. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 02:14, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) Would it be a good idea to merge the Private Practice task force into the Grey's Anatomy? Then you could rename it the Shonda Rimes task force? Maybe? Just thinking, otherwise the PP task force will be another defunct task force. — M.Mario (T/C) 18:55, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
- The Private Practice task force is a task force of the larger WikiProject Grey's Anatomy. There is no need to alter this. Also, TBrandley, I don't know why you think one-season Awake can have its own WikiProject, but six-season PP cannot have its own task force. There are 100+ episodes and several characters to be created for PP, which makes the scope huge. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 19:13, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
- Apologies for my mistake. There's an Awake task force? Jeez. — M.Mario (T/C) 19:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
- There's an Awake wikiproject, lol. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 19:31, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
- Apologies for my mistake. There's an Awake task force? Jeez. — M.Mario (T/C) 19:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
- The Private Practice task force is a task force of the larger WikiProject Grey's Anatomy. There is no need to alter this. Also, TBrandley, I don't know why you think one-season Awake can have its own WikiProject, but six-season PP cannot have its own task force. There are 100+ episodes and several characters to be created for PP, which makes the scope huge. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 19:13, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) Would it be a good idea to merge the Private Practice task force into the Grey's Anatomy? Then you could rename it the Shonda Rimes task force? Maybe? Just thinking, otherwise the PP task force will be another defunct task force. — M.Mario (T/C) 18:55, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Episode Summaries
Question, How long do you think episode summaries should be? I'm only asking because this user keeps making the episode summaries for Season 2 of OUAT a one sentence summary.. Tvlover96 (talk) 18:06, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
- 4-5 lines is the normalcy for the season articles' episode summaries. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 18:08, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
CGC ACR
Hey! I am going to start developing new articles, so I won't be checking the ACR for A Change Is Gonna Come (Grey's Anatomy) daily. I would be truly grateful if you could let me know on my talk page when you post something on the ACR. Thanks! Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 08:59, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
- I'm the director/coordinator of WP:SGH/ACR, so I only leave final comments to be addressed after the article has garnered enough support for promotion. If you want to know when someone reviewed, watchlist the ACR. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 13:31, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
Hey! I noticed you updated the character articles with the new promo pics (btw, they look great!). However, Derek's article still has that picture (I don't know why the season 7 promo pic for him was replaced in the first place). Are you going to update the season 9 pic? Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 15:42, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
- The current Derek picture is a PNG format, and the S9 picture is a JPG. That said, I have to upload a new image, instead of simply replacing it. I'll do it when I can. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 18:26, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
TFA
Coming soon, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:23, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 00:27, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 19:39, 22 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
TBrandley 19:39, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 22 October 2012
- Special report: Examining adminship from the German perspective
- Arbitration report: Malleus Fatuorum accused of circumventing topic ban; motion to change "net four votes" rule
- Technology report: Wikivoyage migration: technical strategy announced
- Discussion report: Good articles on the main page?; reforming dispute resolution
- News and notes: Wikimedians get serious about women in science
- WikiProject report: Where in the world is Wikipedia?
- Featured content: Is RfA Kafkaesque?
April Kepner
I am new to the show, just started watching and for some reason, I really like her character as annoying as she is. As you may have noticed, I tried expanding the article, which proved to be a difficult task considering the character is still not getting much of a focus on the show or by critics...I tried molding it according to the pages of other characters from the show. I hope you take some time to copy edit it and maybe add your own inputs. Thanks.--Meryam90 (talk) 05:23, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
- Great job with the article! I'll clean it up/expand and then maybe we can push it to GA. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 21:20, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
GA Review
Hi Joey! I was wondering, if you had the time, if you could review the article Sharon Newman for GA. One user in particular, Arre 9, has put a tremendous amount of work into it and it would be great for WP:SOAPS to get it to GA. I understand that you're busy, so let me know. Creativity97 14:35, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
- Sure, I signed up – I'll get to it shortly. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 21:24, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
- Great! Thanks so much. Creativity97 22:44, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Random thoughts
Hey Joey! I've several things to say :)
- First, congrats on GPAC being featured on the main page; that's great!
- Then, do you agree with me on the remark I made concerning April Kepner? If you haven't noticed; go check my talk page ;-)
- Also, I've watched the latest GA episode. As of now, I think the first 2 episodes are the best in spite of Mark's fate. I hated to see in "Love the One You're With" that Alex was back as a "manwhore" and it's pretty obvious he'll start a relationship with Jo the intern. April and Jackson's relationship is boring and so is Richard and Catherine's. I loved Cristina bonding with the old man but I was pissed she slept with the boss. I hope she comes back soon. Callie and Arizona's shower scene in "Love the One You're With" was moving. And I'm happy that Arizona didn't reject Alex in "I Saw Her Standing Here".
- Oh and did you find the time to watch the first episode of Emily Owens M.D. ? It was available on Youtube a few weeks ago but now it has maybe been removed...
- And finally, from Wednesday to Saturday I'll be away, (and tomorrow I'm packing my stuff) so I won't be editing at all but don't worry =)
Hmm, I think that's all I wanted to tell you. Have a nice week! --Sofffie7 (talk) 20:21, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, it's so exciting! The only downside is that it's getting so much vandalism. Yes, I do agree with you on April's article. I thought S9E4 was "eh" – it suffered in the ratings, hitting a season low 3.0. The 3.0 means that it's not the week's top drama like it has been for the past 3 weeks. I hope it bumps up a little and stabilizes, because it's been dropping week by week (4.4, 3.8, 3.4, 3.0). In fact, it only registered as Thursday's top drama by a tenth of a ratings point (Person of Interest had a 2.9). I watched EOMD, and I liked it, but unfortunately it scored a 0.3 last week (ouch). Additionally, Ace is being really difficult at April's talk page, saying that if April isn't a general surgeon, then neither is Meredith. Perhaps you can reply to his most recent post. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 20:36, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Soon
I will get to your stuff soon. I only have phone Internet right now, but when I soon have computer internet, I will get to all things needed then, hence could you keep my ACR open also? Thanks, TBrandley 00:45, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- Of course. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 01:42, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 October 2012
- News and notes: First chickens come home to roost for FDC funding applicants; WMF board discusses governance issues and scope of programs
- WikiProject report: In recognition of... WikiProject Military History
- Technology report: Improved video support imminent and Wikidata.org live
- Featured content: On the road again