User talk:Tazzmanovik

Tazzmanovik, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Tazzmanovik! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Hajatvrc (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:18, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Mikemor92. I noticed that you recently removed some content from United States men's national soccer team without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! – Michael (talk) 00:10, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Kaká, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 01:25, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Southampton F.C., without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. JMHamo (talk) 01:17, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Southampton F.C., you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. JMHamo (talk) 01:31, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm MrScorch6200. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Kosovo national football team, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. MrScorch6200 (talk) 03:29, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. JNW (talk) 03:31, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Saber Khelifa. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Giant Snowman 11:53, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Domenico Berardi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Giant Snowman 17:34, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Simone Zaza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forward. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Liverpool F.C., you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. QED237 (talk) 15:04, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Liverpool F.C.. DVdm (talk) 15:09, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Genoa C.F.C. may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

player | no= 27 | nat= ITA | pos= MF | name= [[Antonino Ragusa]] }} | other= at [[Vicenza Calcio]] }}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:23, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Newcastle United F.C.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you.

You may have written it in another language, but this edit you made clearly shows disruptive editing. LRD 09:12, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Newcastle United F.C., you may be blocked from editing. LRD 09:13, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Newcastle United F.C., you may be blocked from editing without further notice. LRD 09:16, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges, as you did at Newcastle United F.C.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:34, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Hello, I'm SLBedit. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to S.L. Benfica because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! SLBedit (talk) 19:11, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at S.L. Benfica, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Yet another case of including insults on the article page when an editor finds issue with your edit, as you did here. Do not think you can evade blocks by abusing and playing the warning escalation system. LRD 23:21, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mfield (Oi!) 01:19, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]