User talk:Venkatasubramaniyaiyer

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 21:59, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Ayothiapattinam

added a link pointing to Lakshmanan

Thottiyam

added a link pointing to Bhumi

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Your edit to Thottiyam has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Nobody (talk) 06:32, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Ramayana, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:11, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Chronikhiles ^(talk) 05:53, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Chronikhiles. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Chronikhiles ^(talk) 06:18, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Speedy deletion nomination of Kothandaramaswamy Temple, Patteeswaram

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kothandaramaswamy Temple, Patteeswaram requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://prtraveller.blogspot.com/2012/11/patteeswaram-kothandarama-temple.html and https://www.thehindu.com/features/friday-review/history-and-culture/temple-linked-to-legends/article4122835.ece. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 09:16, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pancha Narayana Kshethrams moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Pancha Narayana Kshethrams. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and the sources used are unreliable (blogs). Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 14:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sri Lakshmi-Narayana temple moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sri Lakshmi-Narayana temple. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 15:21, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sri Lakshmi-Narayana temple (July 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Mostly unsourced, and entirely unsuitable in tone.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sri Lakshmi-Narayana temple and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 09:52, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Venkatasubramaniyaiyer! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 09:52, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Perumal

I suspect you've copy-pasted substantial content from Tamil mythology to Perumal without adding the copying from Wikipedia template and have added some uncited content as well. I understand and encourage your attempts to contribute to Hinduism-related articles, but please also keep in mind Wikipedia guidelines so that your contributions are not removed. Thank you. Chronikhiles ^(talk) 04:03, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Cilappatikaram into Perumal (deity). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:49, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Venkatasubramaniyaiyer. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. UtherSRG (talk) 14:51, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Venkatasubramaniyaiyer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello Sir or Madam I would request you to unblock my account. I created several article and have several more ideas to create and improve Wikipedia. I understood my mistake and i will not repeat it again please forgive me. I will adhere to the policies of Wikipedia and contribute more to Wikipedia by adhering to its rules and policies. Sorry and Thank you Venkatasubramaniyaiyer (talk) 05:46, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please describe the rules you violated and tell us what you will do differently, in order to demonstrate understanding. 331dot (talk) 07:36, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello Sir/Madam, it's unfortunate that I got blocked. I have read through the findings of the investigation and I now understand the reason why I was blocked. The reason why I was blocked is I was creating multiple accounts and i regret performing such actions, i promise i will not create more accounts and will avoid doing anything that could link me to abuses. I appeal to be unblocked as I have understood the platform better and have prepared articles on notable subjects I would like to work on. I created articles like Sundararaja Perumal Temple, Salem, Adi Srinivasa perumal temple, Pancha Kshethram, Vaishnavism in Ancient Tamilakam and many more contributions to Wikipedia. I have to add citations to the article Vaishnavism in Ancient Tamilakam and several more articles to create on main topics like Hindu temples, Vedic Literature and Tamil Literature. All the information I added to the articles were so useful even for historians and all the information and articles are not deleted. Vedic Literature and Tamil literature are one of the oldest literatures in the world and many important informations were not mentioned in these articles, my main goal to create this account was to add more informations. I added several citations and created many articles. I understand what I did was wrong but please forgive me and I will not repeat this mistake, i am so sorry. I still have plans to create several more articles on Vedic religion, Tamil literature, Hindu temples and add many other references to many articles, so Please do consider my request and please unblock my user, This is a request from my side. Sorry and Thank you Venkatasubramaniyaiyer (talk) 08:40, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You need to make a new unblock request for someone else to review. 331dot (talk) 08:55, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for guiding me Sir/Ma'am. Venkatasubramaniyaiyer (talk) 09:00, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Venkatasubramaniyaiyer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello Sir/Madam, it's unfortunate that I got blocked. I have read through the findings of the investigation and I now understand the reason why I was blocked. The reason why I was blocked is I was creating multiple accounts and i regret performing such actions, i promise i will not create more accounts and will avoid doing anything that could link me to abuses. I appeal to be unblocked as I have understood the platform better and have prepared articles on notable subjects I would like to work on. I created articles like Sundararaja Perumal Temple, Salem, Adi Srinivasa perumal temple, Pancha Kshethram, Vaishnavism in Ancient Tamilakam and many more contributions to Wikipedia. I have to add citations to the article Vaishnavism in Ancient Tamilakam and several more articles to create on main topics like Hindu temples, Vedic Literature and Tamil Literature. All the information I added to the articles were so useful even for historians and all the information and articles are not deleted. Vedic Literature and Tamil literature are one of the oldest literatures in the world and many important informations were not mentioned in these articles, my main goal to create this account was to add more informations. I added several citations and created many articles. I understand what I did was wrong but please forgive me and I will not repeat this mistake, i am so sorry. I still have plans to create several more articles on Vedic religion, Tamil literature, Hindu temples and add many other references to many articles, so Please do consider my request and please unblock my user, This is a request from my side. Sorry and Thank you Venkatasubramaniyaiyer (talk) 08:40, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Obviously planning to continue violating WP:SOCK as you simultaneously requested an unblock request over at User talk:Narayanan Iyengar. Yamla (talk) 11:38, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Venkatasubramaniyaiyer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello Sir/Madam, it's unfortunate that I got blocked. I have read through the findings of the investigation and I now understand the reason why I was blocked. The reason why I was blocked is I was creating multiple accounts and i regret performing such actions, i promise i will not create more accounts and will avoid doing anything that could link me to abuses. I appeal to be unblocked as I have understood the platform better and have prepared articles on notable subjects I would like to work on. I created articles like Sundararaja Perumal Temple, Salem, Adi Srinivasa perumal temple, Pancha Kshethram, Vaishnavism in Ancient Tamilakam and many more contributions to Wikipedia. I promise that i will mot use any other user than Venkatasubramaniyaiyer if I do so you can prevent me from editing each and every page (including this page). Please do consider my request and forgive me. I need to add several references to the page and i would love to contribute much more information to many articles. I regret creating multiple accounts and i will not use those accounts which were created by me except this account. I still have plans to create several more articles on Vedic religion, Tamil literature, Hindu temples and add many other references to many articles, so Please do consider my request and please unblock my user, This is a request from my side. Sorry and Thank you.Venkatasubramaniyaiyer (talk) 15:11, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. A copy&paste unblock request deserves only a templated decline. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:30, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

We're going in circles. TPA revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:16, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Concern regarding Draft:Pancha Narayana Kshethrams

Hello, Venkatasubramaniyaiyer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pancha Narayana Kshethrams, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sri Lakshmi-Narayana temple

Hello, Venkatasubramaniyaiyer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sri Lakshmi-Narayana temple, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:05, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]