User talk:Virajmishra

Virajmishra, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Virajmishra! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:04, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Virajmishra (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand Wikipedia polcies now and I have read these policies . I will not create any self promotional page from now on. I am looking forward to be a valuable contributer to wikipedia Virajmishra (talk) 10:45, 20 July 2017 (UTC} Virajmishra (talk) 10:45, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; identical request open below. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 10:40, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of Naman mishra

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Naman mishra, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Razer(talk) 08:06, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Virajmishra

A tag has been placed on User:Virajmishra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Razer(talk) 08:07, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Naman mishra

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Naman mishra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --George AKA Caliburn · (Talk · Contribs · CentralAuth · Log) 08:42, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, you may be blocked from editing. Cahk (talk) 09:05, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Naman mishra

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Naman mishra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SamHolt6 (talk) 15:12, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Naman mishra

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Naman mishra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Razer(talk) 17:03, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Virajmishra

A tag has been placed on User:Virajmishra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Razer(talk) 17:05, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:15, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Virajmishra (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand Wikipedia polcies now and I have read these policies . I will not create any self promotional page from now on. I am looking forward to be a valuable contributer to wikipedia Virajmishra (talk) 11:31, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline because the blocked user has opened another request with the exact same rationale below. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:05, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Can you tell us what sorts of contributions you will make if unblocked? GAB^gab 18:33, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Virajmishra (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand Wikipedia polcies now and I have read these policies . I will not create any self promotional page from now on. I am looking forward to be a valuable contributer to wikipedia Virajmishra (talk) 04:21, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have expressed a desire to have your account deleted below. We cannot do that. THere's no reason to unblock if you don't desire to edit anymore based on that statement.

Also, there is no reason to unblock your IP.  only (talk) 18:19, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I will never create a page. Sir, unblock my account. Nor will I ever get wrong edit.. Virajmishra (talk) 07:28, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Plz unblock my account sir immediately plz sir Virajmishra (talk) 19:33, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sir Sir, I did wrong editing, had blocked for this.No Ab nahi kahNow do not unblock my account now...plz sir Virajmishra (talk) 13:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry sir for the typing...now unblock my account immediately plz sir Virajmishra (talk) 13:23, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sir now what happened plz unblock from editing please Virajmishra (talk) 13:39, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear sir please unblock my ip address Virajmishra (talk) 13:50, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear ..plz unblock my ip address nd delete my account from Wikipedia...i hate Wikipedia page and articles..plz unblock my IP address Virajmishra (talk) 18:01, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What do you want Reason, I've never been wrong editing anywhere so plz my ip address unblock and unblock from editing..plz Virajmishra (talk) 18:27, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, when you are unblock My IP address.. Virajmishra (talk) 14:12, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

only (talk) 10:22, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

his user has engaged in block evasion as of October, 2017. --Yamla (talk) 11:04, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just blocked Nm52663 as a proven sock. —SpacemanSpiff 14:23, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Virajmishra (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please unblock my this account I will no longer create an account, I did not know Wikipedia's rule before but now know , Now I will not do any wrong thing editing.my all account are you close but my this account please unblock. 2405:204:E187:5295:9A76:EE00:A8A1:5615 (talk) 16:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Start by cutting out the block evasion. Alex Shih ^Talk 17:26, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Virajmishra (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i have readed so I came after 3 month. And i don't have any other account neither i have created any editing. Please remove blocking of my account. In future i will never ever try to make any account. Please unlock my this account virajmishra account as soon as possible. Please forgive my first mistakes. Now I will not make any mistake in life.Please unlock my account. And SpacemanSpiff sorry im very very sorry.Thank you so much. 2405:204:E20B:3749:3DEC:7023:701F:425C (talk) 17:51, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Technical decline - you must log in to your account to request unblock. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:07, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

More block evasion

[1][2] --Guy Macon (talk) 14:59, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And still more.[3] Would semiprotection of this user page and talk page be in order? --Guy Macon (talk) 00:06, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]