User talk:Wikicohen

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/HipHossip.com.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Snowysusan 02:02, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi!

I see you're still working on that article, don't forget to add:

 {{subst:submit}}

to the article when you'd like it to be reviewed again. Cheers, --j⚛e decker ^talk 19:40, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Almost ready. Still a lot of info to post as I am searching for inclusions and not make it a resume for that site.Wikicohen (talk) 10:59, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Im confused and cannot see the last part of the article Music Foundation and even the Refs and External links. I press submit and nothing has ben done 4 days. How should I proceed? Wikicohen (talk) 08:21, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/HipHossip.com concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/HipHossip.com, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I sent it to be approved and nobody touched it. HipHossip has since been rebranded to HNNAfrica and I am merging content. How do you submit and get it looked at?

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/HipHossip.com

Hello Wikicohen. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "HipHossip.com".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/HipHossip.com}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:59, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/HNN Africa concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/HNN Africa, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/HNN Africa

Hello Wikicohen. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "HNN Africa".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/HNN Africa}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 11:32, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Wikicohen/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wia /talk 12:29, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Wikicohen, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! /wia /talk 12:29, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kemi Omololu-Olunloyo (July 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms, that are designed to promote or show-off the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kemi Omololu-Olunloyo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 21:28, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Wikicohen, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 21:28, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kemi Omololu-Olunloyo has been accepted

Kemi Omololu-Olunloyo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:50, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:56, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please indent your edits on talk page by adding colon signs before the text, see Wikipedia:Indentation. You might have noticed that I added them for you on the talk page. Sjö (talk) 05:24, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Kemi Omololu-Olunloyo. Like this edit [1] with unsourced allegations of neglected abuse. Do make sure that your edits are supported by reliable sources. Sjö (talk) 05:27, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but I saw these in a website about her children's abuse. Why was the line removed about her charges dropped? There is no reference for that as it included children and it was not made public. The Toronto Star Article leaves people thinking she's still a fugitive. Also PLS explain why you keep removing her job as a medical correspondent for Nigerian Television Authority. I even sourced her EBOLA articles among others. I also need to tell you I have no conflict of interest with ms OmololuOlunloyo. Never met her, spoke to her, or know anyone who knows her, just studied her online after her deportation and all her activities as a Nigerian. Pls remove that major contributor stuff as it is indirectly referring to me. Pls respond to my questions. Her deportation has official reasons and unofficial reasons and I'm ok with what the Toronto sun reported. Wikicohen (talk) 10:06, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Kemi Omololu-Olunloyo. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Your capitalization, editing style and knowledge of non-public information shows that you are Ms. Omololu-Olunloyo. Please observe the conflict of interest rules in the future. Especially, stop adding unsourced information and puffery to the article. Sjö (talk) 05:10, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I repeat I am NOT Ms Kemi Omololu-Olunloyo. What are the new unsourced information you have? Non public information is posted all over on this woman's Facebook pages. Is a Facebook page not sourcable? In will read up on puffery Wikicohen (talk) 06:46, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kemi you do realize all of your edits and everything you discuss with people is posted publicly for the world to see right? we can see you all over the place with ms kemi, then she,than her, then "I'm" it's indicative of someone authoring their own biography on wikipedia, can't you see the COI Shawn aka 70.26.73.164 (talk) 12:35, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Inaccurate Edits

Why do these edits keep changing with wrong information? Ms Omololu-Olunloyo attended high school in Oxford England and Nigeria but mostly in England. Elementary in Nigeria nd senior high in England. I have researched this woman extensively and I am not related to her. She is an award winning Pharmacist and it is in several inclusions online as well as the boards of Pharmacies. Pharmacy is her first degree and journalism is her 3rd and what she practices now. She is a notable pharmacist with inclusions not online. Pls stop removing this neutral correct information. This is getting ridiculous. Also why are previous talk removed from this page. i will re-add these Wikicohen (talk) 22:00, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry kemi but I hope you didn't think you could lie all over wikipedia and get away with it did you? please post correct and factual sources in your wiki page or I will have to remove them, thank you - Shawn 70.26.73.164 (talk) 16:26, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

John Momoh

yes you can edit this. You can disclose your COI on your user page, say if you are paid to edit Wikipedia. But a remote connection, just because you know someone is not a problem. Sticking to information that is already published is the way to avoid problems with sources. Do not put in information that you know personally if it has no reliable source. What is the problem is if you are editing Wikipedia to further their interest, eg removing negative sourced writings. Be aware you may attract attention from wikistalkers. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:46, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:43, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ~ Rob^Talk 14:58, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creating user pages for other editors

Hi. Please note that it is generally not appropriate to create user pages for other editors. Editors are not required to have user pages, and it is generally expected that you not edit or create pages in another editor's userspace without permission as per WP:NOBAN. Thanks. ~ Rob^Talk 12:22, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fine Rob, but the page said if you want to create a page type in Wikishawnio and that is why I did that. His red linked name says page does not exist. Shouldnt it exist? Wikicohen (talk) 12:25, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is no requirement for it to exist. The page is for WikiShawnio to create (or not) at his discretion. ~ Rob^Talk 12:30, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. One more question, how do I get a collage of photos to Kemi Omololu-Olunloyo. I have found some free images. Wikicohen (talk) 12:34, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If they're offered under a free license compatible with Wikipedia, meaning that at most the requirements of the license are attribution and share-alike, then you can upload them to the Commons. See Wikipedia:Uploading images. ~ Rob^Talk 13:03, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you are doing wikicohen but I suggest you think about your actions, the moderators are watching your contributions, take care. WikiShawnio (talk) 15:02, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Your recent editing history at Kemi Omololu-Olunloyo shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~ Rob^Talk 22:55, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wikicohen, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

~ Rob^Talk 00:08, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have only one account on Wikipedia and have no time for sockpuppeting. It may be of interest to see a comment left by someone on Kemi Omololu-Olunloyo's Gun violence blog which I read daily. You should be investigating her confirmed stalker Wikishawnio and this comment. [redacted per WP:OUTING] Pls don't accuse me of false and unwarranted investigations. I appreciate it. I repeat, I do NOT have multiple accounts and have no time for that. The comment written is typical of comments written by Wikishawnio on Kemi's blogs [redacted per WP:OUTING] The Writer feels they are talking to Kemi and feel she felt for their "ploy" Unfortunately, I'm not Kemi. I created her page and once again I know the history of Kemi and Shawn McQuaid as told to me by Toronto PoliceNever met or spoke to them both but their history is all over the internet. INVESTIGATE Wikishawnio properly. Wikicohen (talk) 10:13, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is imperative that you do not write material anywhere on the Wikipedia site — including talk pages — including even your own user talk page — which establishes or suggests a link between a Wikipedia editor and their real-world identity or activities outside Wikipedia. This is a violation of the "outing" policy, and it is strictly prohibited and can result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Whether the material in question is true or not does not matter. And although one editor should normally not mess with comments made by another editor on a talk page (see WP:USERTALK), this is permitted (and, indeed, is required) when necessary to expunge "outing". I have also removed similar material which you wrote on your currently open sockpuppetry investigation page. Again, this sort of material is prohibited by Wikipedia policy, regardless of whether or not it is true, and you risk being blocked from editing — possibly indefinitely — if you continue to do it now that you've been explicitly warned. 02:58, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Kemi Omololu-Olunloyo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kemi Omololu-Olunloyo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kemi Omololu-Olunloyo (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MSJapan (talk) 21:36, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 13:02, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For any reviewing admins, please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wikicohen to view the legal threat...it is not possible to produce a diff for this as it has been oversighted.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 13:05, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Wikicohen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Last month I was falsey accused of sockpuppetry by a Wikipedia editor. After being unfairly accused, I got a message directed to me by another person Wikishawnio who is now blocked because of edit warring. He actually said he "set me up" for that sockpuppet investigation and I fell for it. How could 4 different IP's edit Kemi Omololu-Olunloyo from Nigeria at different times and it was me. Nigeria does not even have unique IP's on any computer. The IP's used are unique to the internet carrier. I explained it carefully even though that investigation was closed, I did threaten legal action and advise when it was active because I felt I was falsely accused of doing something illegal. That caused Rob to scream loud that I was threatening to sue him. I am no longer seeking any legal action or threats because the case was resolved, the page I built was semi protected as I requested and the edit warrior was blocked. The message Wikishawnio sent me saying he set me up for sockpuppetry investigation was overlooked which was even more insulting to me accusing me of false acts. Pls unblock me. User talk :Berean Hunter Also I had no knowledge that making a legal threat was against Wikipedia policies. I have now ead and reviewed every single Wikipedia policy to avoid such blocks again. Wikicohen (talk) 7:59 am, Today (UTC+1)

Accept reason:

As you have stated you no longer seek any legal action, I'm ~~unblocking you.~~ reducing your block to approximately one week after again reviewing the sock puppet investigation. The evidence is pretty convincing. I would have reduced it to 72 hours if you had admitted it. I presume that you understand that if you make any suggestion of legal action again, or suggest that anyone else take legal action, you will be blocked again and I doubt that anyone would unblock you a second time. The same goes for using other accounts. Doug Weller (talk) 09:52, 25 September 2015 (UTC) revised 17:39, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Doug Weller There is no reason for me to admit something I was not involved. I do not have sockpuppet accounts. I have only one account on Wikipedia. After 7 days I will resume editing articles.Wikicohen (talk) 08:54, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again

Since you have shown that you still have no editorial interests except to continue your WP:COI agenda of self-aggrandization at Kemi Omololu-Olunloyo, and since your edits there have continued to be a net negative to the article, I have reinstated an indefinite block on this account. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:08, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly what disruptive COI editing did I do by Capitalizing the word deportation to Deportation and also Social Activism. I also added she was a Public Relations Specialist as seen on her Facebook page. That does not warrant a blockage. Fut.Perf. Pls explain and reconsider unblocking me. Maybe I don't know how to edit or punctuate an article. I'm about to build a new article on something else and edit others. Thanks Wikicohen (talk) 14:07, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikicohen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

See above Sjö (talk) 06:35, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were given a clear reason in the edit summary why sections don't need to be capitalized, and you returned and did it again. This in itself is not a grievous offense, but in the larger context, you done more to waste others' time than to contribute anything useful to the project. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:00, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've added the unblock template only as a housekeeping measure to make sure that your request is processed. To the reviewing administrator: please note that there is also a sockpuppet case to consider, which in my opinion is enough for a permanent block. Sjö (talk) 06:35, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

^Talk I was not given any reason in the edit summary. or maybe I don't know how to read one. Pls review it again. I built the project and think more people have wasted my time on the projectWikicohen (talk) 21:04, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kemi Omololu-Olunloyo

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Kemi Omololu-Olunloyo. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Brain7days (talk) 00:40, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]