User talk:Y45ed

Welcome!

Hello, Y45ed, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Dan56 (talk) 14:44, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to ¡Tré!, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 14:44, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Focus X

Hi, I'm Josh1024. Y45ed, thanks for creating Focus X!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hi, just reviewed your article on Focus X, would suggest adding citations and addressing other issues. Apart from that good article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. —Preceding undated comment added 21:50, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Rubber Soul, without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 00:48, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Websites that mirror content from Wikipedia are not reliable sources and should be avoided (Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks). The website you cited in this edit clearly shows a previous revision of Wikipedia's infobox for Rubber Soul. Dan56 (talk) 19:41, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, never use sites that mirror Wikipedia content. Genres in particular are subjective views, which should only be given weight if from scholarly critiques and experts in music journalism/criticism (WP:SUBJECTIVE). None of these credits indicates such expertise. BTW, any tech-savvy Internet user can design their own website or blog and claim to be an expert (WP:Self-published sources). The site you used specifically says in their terms and conditions as a disclaimer on behalf of the site's publisher: "Apple Corps Ltd does not make any representation or warranty in respect of the accuracy and / or reliability of any of the information, content, software or advertisements..." Dan56 (talk) 20:33, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Hello, I'm Technopat. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added, because it seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Technopat (talk) 19:34, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Terry Draper (musician).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Terry Draper (musician).jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:39, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at The Beatles (album), you may be blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 16:46, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

I Saw Her Standing There (album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Swanee River, Ya-Ya, John Blackwell and Tomorrow Never Knows (album)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:06, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Tucky Buzzard (album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Heavy metal

A Hard Road (Black Sabbath song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bill Ward

Tucky Buzzard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Heavy metal

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:37, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 12:39, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Tucky Buzzard - Allright on the Night.png

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

File:Tucky Buzzard - Allright on the Night.png

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 21:01, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Last Living Souls (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at Plastic Beach, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dan56 (talk) 12:44, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Her Majesty

Wikipedia guidelines typically require you to do two things in regards to genre changes and additions, particularly when your edits meet with disagreement; you must source the edits, and you must discuss them in an attempt to reach consensus. I would recommend you initiate a discussion here in regards to the "folk music" genre addition you're trying to add to Her Majesty. Edit warring will only get your editing privileges suspended. ChakaKong^{Let's talk about it} 14:19, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Creating articles for non-notable subjects

Please stop creating new pages for subjects that do not meet the notability requirements to justify the article's creation, as you've done recently at "Last Living Souls (song)" and "A Hard Road (Black Sabbath song)". Please familiarize yourself with the notability requirements and ensure that any subject meets these requirements before creating the article. ChakaKong^{Let's talk about it} 14:58, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Tomorrow Never Knows (The Beatles album), without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. ChakaKong^{Let's talk about it} 14:40, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Christmas Time (Is Here Again), you may be blocked from editing. ChakaKong^{Let's talk about it} 12:00, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ChakaKong^{Let's talk about it} 14:01, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I have blocked your account for 48 hours for repeatedly changing genres after warnings. If you feel this is unfair you should post {{unblock|your reason here ~~~~}} but you should read WP:GAB first. Otherwise, you should use your time out to ponder on why this kind of edit is considered so disruptive here. WP:NOR, WP:V and WP:TE will all be good places to start. Good luck, --John (talk) 14:53, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ChakaKong^{Let's talk about it} 21:53, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

re: Symptom Of The Universe

First of all, you are misrepresenting Iommi's quote from the book. He did not categorically state that he "agree(d) with that claim" that the song is progressive metal. What he said was, and I quote directly from book, "I won't disagree with that". That is not an endorsement or confirmation by any means, and it simply isn't enough to justify the genre addition. Remember to keep your opinion out of your editing. Additionally, Iommi's opinion is non-neutral, and opinionated sources can quite often be questionable. If you want to push the matter, start a discussion and look for consensus on the subject. ChakaKong^{Let's talk about it} 20:59, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Symptom of the Universe (song), without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ChakaKong^{Let's talk about it} 21:04, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Hocus Pocus - The Best Of Focus album artwork.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Hocus Pocus - The Best Of Focus album artwork.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 00:55, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited On Air – Live at the BBC Volume 2, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Misery (song) and P. S. I Love You (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Genre warring

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at A Hard Day's Night (album), you may be blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 02:20, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at Silly Boys, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ChakaKong^{Let's talk about it} 01:17, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from adding sources which do not actually confirm the material you are attempting to add, as you did at Hope (Klaatu album) and others. All future instances will be regarded as vandalism and will be dealt with as such. ChakaKong^{Let's talk about it} 01:29, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

re : Klattu

First of all, it was you who initiated this by adding a new genre without source or consensus. I saw nothing to confirm this aside from your opinion, so I changed it to the genre assigned to the album the track comes from, which was progressive rock. Seemed logical, no? To be honest, the song fails to meet the notability guidelines anyhow, so problem solved. ChakaKong^{Let's talk about it} 20:07, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Sir Army Suit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. PantherLeapord|My talk page|My CSD log 00:35, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, please explain to me how this is vandalism. I was not attempting to "compromise the integrity of Wikipedia". I was not "adding irrelevant obscenities and crude humor to a page, illegitimately blanking pages, and inserting obvious nonsense into a page". My edit to Sir Army Suit was sourced, the Allmusic review clearly says it is is a Pop album. Y45ed (talk) 16:29, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit warring is just as disruptive as blatant vandalism. PantherLeapord|My talk page|My CSD log 21:20, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to List of psychedelic rock artists, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ChakaKong^{Let's talk about it} 15:12, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tom Robinson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Wave (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:43, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Y45ed. You have new messages at Dan56's talk page.
Message added 03:26, 24 September 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

re: Symptom of the Universe

As of September 28, 2013, you are still genre warring/edit warring on Symptom of the Universe (song), and possibly elsewhere. I have long ago grown tired of dealing with your failure to accept without opposition Wikipedia's guidelines in regards to this behaviour, but I will offer you this one last friendly reminder that your enduring edit warring while still the subject of an open ANI is quite unwise. ChakaKong^{Let's talk about it} 14:47, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:The Feeling - Boy Cried Wolf.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:The Feeling - Boy Cried Wolf.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Blurred Lines 20:46, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please do delete that one, since it is an accidental duplicate.Y45ed (talk) 20:49, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Genre warring again

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band, you may be blocked from editing. Please consider editing articles beyond spending at least 95 percent of your Wikipedia time altering the genre field of music infoboxes or the genre categories. Dan56 (talk) 23:12, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly it amazes me how you can blatantly lie when the truth is here for everyone to see. I added the genre with a reliable source. It was you who then got fussy and decided that you wanted the genres in a different order. In other words, you started the "edit war".

I didn't include a link to WP:EDITWAR, but to WP:GWAR. And the genre warring warning template reads "without discussion or..." Perhaps reading WP:GWAR would welcome you to a rude awakening. What's unfortunately amazing is this, which may be over 95 percent. Dan56 (talk) 23:08, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Helter Skelter (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:16, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited California Jam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Genre warring on Heritage (Opeth album)

Please stop removing sourced information from Heritage (Opeth album). "Progressive metal" is sourced, and has been accepted by consensus on that article. If you disagree, start a discussion on Talk:Heritage (Opeth album). Do not continue to removed sourced material. Thank you. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 17:26, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The source cited does not say the album is progressive metal, it only describes one song from the album being this genre, therefore not enough to go on to call the whole 12-song album progressive metal.Y45ed (talk) 17:32, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Several other editors on that article have already accepted it. As I said, if you disagree, discuss it, do not continue to remove it. If you continue to edit war, I can bring this to WP:ANI and ask that they block you (as I see you have a history of genre warring). MrMoustacheMM (talk) 17:35, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please link me to this apparent consensus, as all I can see on the article's talk page is one discussion with only two messages in it, one of them being you, which does not count as consensus. Y45ed (talk) 17:38, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

From WP:CONSENSUS: "Consensus is a normal and usually implicit and invisible process across Wikipedia. Any edit that is not disputed or reverted by another editor can be assumed to have consensus." Additionally, the hidden note in the editing text of the genre field: "Please discuss on talk page or use reliable sources if you have an issue with this genre line-up. Please try not to edit this area to adhere to your point of view. Thank you." That the article has accepted these genres (and the hidden note) for as long as it has shows that consensus has been reached to include them. It is true that consensus can change; perhaps this is one of those times. However, this will have to be done through discussion, not your edit warring, per WP:BRD. If you really think it should be removed, start a discussion, and wait until more editors have had their say (generally a week is considered a reasonable amount of time). In the meantime, stop your genre warring. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 17:43, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Y45ed is apparently still incapable of distinguishing between a collaborative project and a personal blog. ChakaKong^{Let's talk about it} 22:30, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please inform me, since I am quite confused, why I am in the wrong. The source cited was a link to the Allmusic review, in which the reviewer states, and i quote, "The Devil's Orchard ... melds progressive metal with prog rock". One song being labelled prog-metal is simply not enough to support the claim for the whole album. Why I am suddenly a war criminal for removing it with reason, practicing something that YOU preach? The genre did not have a reliable source, therefore I removed it. I am not treating this as a personal blog, as I would be more than happy to keep the genre if a reliable source was provided but, after not finding anything on the internet that supported the claim, I removed it. Y45ed (talk) 23:16, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are in the wrong because you are making an edit against the accepted consensus on the article without any discussion first (which in and of itself could be considered being bold, although the hidden note asking for discussion is quite visible when you edit that area of the article), and then when your edit is reverted, you continue to make the edit instead of discussing it on the article's talk page. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 23:32, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please note how I have not edited the page since you informed me of this on your second message of this section. You decided not to tell me earlier, therefore how was i supposed to know? Put yourself in my position. I saw something that didn't have a reliable source, so I removed it. If you had told me this before, I would have stopped upon your first rv, but instead you decided to let the edit war happen. Y45ed (talk) 23:39, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have noted that, which is why I have continued to reply here. When editing, please try to pay closer attention to any hidden notes in the immediate vicinity of where you are editing; that may have stopped this before it even began. Be aware that any edits to the genre field of an infobox may be questioned or undone by editors on Wikipedia (as shown by your talk page above); it is often a better plan to just start the discussion before making an edit, or upon the first revert. I look forward to discussing this specific sourcing issue on the article's talk page. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 23:49, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Mrwallace05 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:26, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Beatles - Live at the BBC Remaster.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Beatles - Live at the BBC Remaster.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:22, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of I Saw Her Standing There (album)

The article I Saw Her Standing There (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a particularly notable bootleg. References are not about this particular bootleg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bedivere (talk) 01:33, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Beatles - I Saw Her Standing There.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Beatles - I Saw Her Standing There.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]