Jump to content

Vickers 6-ton

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by A1d391kIw6E8Cu8T3G (talk | contribs) at 12:31, 29 November 2015 (Added portals). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Vickers 6-Ton Tank
Polish Vickers E
Polish Type A (twin-turrets) Vickers E
TypeLight tank
Place of originUnited Kingdom
Service history
In service1932–1939 (Poland)
1938–1959 (Finland)
WarsChaco War
Second Sino-Japanese War
World War II
Winter War
Franco-Thai War
Production history
DesignerJohn Valentine Carden
Vivian Loyd
Designed1928
ManufacturerVickers
Specifications
Mass7.3 tonnes
Length4.88 m (16 ft 0 in)
Width2.41 m (7 ft 11 in)
Height2.16 m (7 ft 1 in)
Crew3

Armour13 mm
Main
armament
47 mm gun (Type B only)
50 rounds
Secondary
armament
1 or 2 machine guns
EngineArmstrong Siddeley Puma[citation needed] petrol
80–98 hp (60–70 kW)
Power/weight11–13 hp/tonne
Suspensionleaf spring bogie
Operational
range
160 km (99 mi)
Maximum speed 35 km/h (22 mph)

The Vickers 6-Ton Tank or Vickers Mark E was a British light tank designed as a private project at Vickers. It was not purchased by the British Army, but was picked up by a large number of foreign armed forces and was licensed with few improvements by the Soviets as the T-26. It was also the direct predecessor of the Polish 7TP tank.

History

The first Mark E was built in 1928 by a design team that included the famed tank designers John Valentine Carden and Vivian Loyd. The hull was made of riveted steel plates, 1 inch (25 mm) thick at the front and over most of the turrets, and about 3/4 inch (19 mm) thick on the rear of the hull. The power was provided by an Armstrong Siddeley Puma engine of 80–95 horsepower (60–70 kW) (depending on the version), which gave it a top speed of 22 mph (35 km/h) on roads.

The suspension used two axles, each of which carried a two-wheel bogie to which a second set of bogies was connected with a leaf spring. Upward movement of either set of bogies would force the other down through the spring. This was considered to be a fairly good system and offered better than normal cross-country performance[citation needed] although it could not compare with the contemporary Christie suspension. High strength steel tracks gave over 3000 miles (5000 km) of life which was considerably better than most designs of the era.[citation needed]

The tank was built in two versions:

  • Type A with two turrets, each mounting a Vickers machine gun.
  • Type B with a single two-man turret mounting a single machine gun and a short-barreled 47 mm cannon OQF 3-pdr Gun.

The Type B proved to be a real innovation: it was found that the two-man turret dramatically increased the rate of fire of either weapon, while still allowing both to be fired at the same time. This design, which they referred to as a duplex mounting, became common on almost all tanks designed after the Mark E.[citation needed]

The British Army evaluated the Mark E, but rejected it, apparently due to questions about the reliability of the suspension.[citation needed] Vickers then started advertising the design to all buyers, and soon received a trickle of orders eventually including USSR, Greece, Poland, Bolivia, Siam, Finland, Portugal, China and Bulgaria. A Thai order was placed, but taken over by the British when the war started.[citation needed] Vickers built a total of 153 (the most common figure) Mark Es.

Experience with the Polish machines showed that the engine tended to overheat due to poor airflow over the air-cooled Puma engine. This was addressed by the addition of large air vents on either side of the hull. For a new Belgian order the design was modified to use the Rolls-Royce Phantom II water-cooled engine instead. This engine would not fit in the rear, and had to be mounted along the left side of the tank, requiring the turret to be moved to the right and rearward. One example of the resulting Mark F was tested by Belgium, but rejected. Nevertheless, the new hull was used, with the older engine, in the sales to Finland and Siam.

The Mark E was also developed as a cargo vehicle, and purchased by the British Army in small numbers as artillery tractors to haul their large 60 pounder (127 mm) artillery guns. Twelve were ordered by the Army as the Dragon, Medium Mark IV, while China purchased 23 and India 18.

Poland purchased 50 and licensed it for the local production, but only put together 38 out of 50, using the unassembled 12 for spare parts. The Poles modified it with larger air intakes, their own machine gun, 360-degree Gundlach periscope.[1] and 5 or more with two—way radios and decided to make their own tank that would address the shortcomings of the very Vickers: in the case of a 7TP, in fact nearly 10 tons heavy, the Poles also, besides the before—mentioned telescope, added liquid—cooled Diesel engine as well as better armor protection, better ventilation, two—way radios, 37 mm Polish version of Bofors anti—tank gun, and a bigger crew compartment. Out of 38 original two-turreted tanks, 22 were later converted to single turret version with a modified turret and the 47 mm main gun (Type B standard). The tanks were in bad shape by 1939 because they were used in the training units over a period of five years. However, they did perform well and better than the Renault R35, amongst others as part of the Polish 10. Cavalry Brigade during the Invasion of Poland in 1939.

Polish Vickers E in 1938

The Soviets were also happy with the design and licensed it for production. However, in their case local production started as the T-26, and eventually over 12,000 were built in various versions.[citation needed] The Soviet early twin-turret T-26s had 7.62 mm DT machine guns in each turret, or a mix of one machine gun turret and one 37 mm gun turret. Later, more common versions mounted a 45 mm gun and two DT machine guns. The final versions of the T-26 had welded construction and, eventually, sloped armor on the hull and turret. Because the T-26 was in such wide use and was a reliable platform, a variety of engineer vehicles were built on the chassis, including flamethrowers and bridgelayers. A novel radio-controlled demolition tank was built on the T-26 chassis also.

During the Spanish Civil War the Soviet Union sent the T-26 to the Republican Army. The Italians, after suffering losses from Republican's T-26 during the battle of Guadalajara (1937), captured some of these tanks which served as a model for their M11/39 and M13/40 light/medium tanks.

In 1939, during the Soviet-Finnish Winter War, the Finnish armoured forces consisted of around thirty-two obsolete Renault FT-17 tanks, some Vickers-Carden-Lloyd Mk. IVs and Model 33s, which were equipped with machine guns, and 26 Vickers Armstrongs 6-ton tanks. The latter had been re-equipped with 37 mm Bofors AT-guns after the outbreak of the war. Only 13 of these tanks managed to get to the front in time to participate in the battles.[2]

At the Battle of Honkaniemi on February 26, 1940, the Finns employed their Vickers tanks for the first – and only – time against Soviet armour during the Winter War. The results were disastrous. Of the thirteen available Finnish Vickers 6-ton tanks only six were in fighting condition and able to participate in the first assault on the Soviet lines – to make matters worse, one of the tanks was forced to stop, unable to cross a wide trench. The remaining five continued onwards a few hundred meters but ran into dozens of Soviet tanks in the village of Honkaniemi. The Finnish tanks managed to knock out three Soviet tanks but were soon themselves knocked-out.[3] In the skirmishes that followed, the Finns lost two more Vickers tanks.[4]

In 1941, the Finns rearmed their Vickers 6-Ton tanks with the Soviet 45 mm gun and re-designated them as T-26E. These tanks were used by the Finnish Army during the Continuation War. 19 rebuilt Vickers tanks, along with 75 T-26s continued in Finnish service after the end of the Second World War.[5] Some of these tanks were kept as training tanks until 1959, when they were finally phased out and replaced by newer British and Soviet tanks.[6]

Operators

  •  Bolivia – used one twin-turret tank Type A and two single-turret tanks Type B. The Bolivian Vickers tanks were the first to see combat service, also the first tanks to see combat in the Americas—in 1933 they were used in the Chaco War against Paraguay. All of them were destroyed or captured by Paraguayan forces. See Tank warfare in the Chaco War.
  •  Bulgaria – bought 8 single-turret Mk.E Type B tanks, used for training only.
  •  Canada – beginning in 1938, 12 of the Vickers 6B were used Canadian Armoured Fighting Vehicle School in a training role. No actual armoured unit was equipped with them although the Princess Patricia's Canadian Light Infantry and Royal Canadian Regiment evaluated them.
  • Republic of China (1912–1949) Republic of China – used 20 single-turret tanks Vickers Mk.E Type B. They were used in combat against the Japanese in Shanghai in 1937.[7]
  •  Finland – used 33 tanks since 1938 (including an evaluation tank). They were bought unarmed, without optics and radios. Some were armed with a short-barreled 37 mm Puteaux gun and later equipped with a 37 mm Bofors anti-tank gun as their main gun with a coaxial turret MG and a "tank SMG" in bow plate. They were used in the Winter War with the USSR. After this war, the Finns rearmed Mark E tanks with captured Soviet long 45 mm guns and DT MGs as used in the T-26. The Finns designated the rebuilt Vickers tanks logically as: T-26E. They were used in combat from 1941–44 and remained in service as training tanks until 1959.
  •  Kingdom of Greece – 1 type A and 1 type B for tests, acquired in 1931. Along with 2 Carden-Loyd Tankettes formed the first armoured battalion of the Greek Army, but were mostly used for training.
  •  Paraguay – One double-turret Vickers Mk.E Type A tank captured to Bolivia, later used as monument, returned to Bolivia in 1994.
  • Poland Second Polish Republic – used 38 tanks since 1932: 22 Type B and 16 Type A tanks. Polish tanks had large air intakes behind the crew compartment as a significant feature. Poland also bought a license and developed an own improved model 7TP. Vickers Mk.E (Vickers E) tanks fought in the Invasion of Poland.
Finnish Vickers
  •  Portugal – 2 tanks for tests
  •  Soviet Union – the first buyer of Vickers Mk.E tanks. In 1931 bought 15 twin-turret tanks Mk.E Type A, and a license. The Soviets next started building and developing own improved tanks T-26 (about 12 000 made).
  •  Spain – one ex-Bolivian single-turret Vickers Mk.E Type B tank bought from Paraguay, and a number of Soviet-made T-26.
  •  Thailand (formerly Siam) – used 30 Vickers Mk.E Type B, which saw combat during the French-Thai War in French Indochina.
  •  Turkey – used 16 Type A tanks since 1940.
  •  United Kingdom – used only 4 tanks for training.
  •  Japan – The Japanese army imported 1 Type A tank to research in 1930. The Japanese army referred to it and developed Type 95 Ha-Go.
  •  Germany – captured from Poland, some converted to self-propelled guns.
  •  Italy –The Italians, after suffering losses from Republican T-26s during the Battle of Guadalajara, captured some of these tanks which served as a model for their M11/39 and M13/40 light/medium tanks.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ 7TP vol.II,Janusz Magnuski, Militaria 317,Warszawa 2009.
  2. ^ Kantakoski, p. 257
  3. ^ Kantakoski, p. 267
  4. ^ Muikku, p. 18
  5. ^ Muikku, Suomalaiset Panssarivaunut 1918–1997, p. 191
  6. ^ Muikku, p. 191
  7. ^ Takizawa, Akira (1999–2000). "Chinese Nationalist Armour in World War II". Forgotten Campaign: The Dutch East Indies Campaign 1941–1942.

References

  • Kantakoski, Pekka (1998). Punaiset panssarit – Puna-armeijan panssarijoukot 1918–1945 (Red tanks – the Red Army's armoured forces 1918–1945) (in Finnish). Hämeenlinna,: Ilves-Paino Oy. p. 512. ISBN 951-98057-0-2.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link)
  • Muikku, Esa; Jukka Purhonen (1998). Suomalaiset Panssarivaunut 1918–1997 (The Finnish Armoured Vehicles 1918–1997) (in Finnish and English). Jyväskylä: Apali. p. 208. ISBN 952-5026-09-4.